No Tsunami was explained here before..it had a flap problem while returning from the races.
MA II had apparent structural failure…which may have resulted due to prop governor failure AFAIK.
Pond Racer was destroyed due to engine fire and dangerously installed valve.
Super Corsair had fire too but pilot parachuted safely.
Those are very rare incidents…unfortunately most of them fatal especially happened to scratch built racers.
At present only Precious Metal…if I am not mistaken also Miss Ashley II had contra unit and Lear Jet wings and elevator.
Dont look to much differant to the Miss Ashley
Gary Lewitz’s naca scooped Miss Ashley has some similarities.
The main difference in all my designs vs. WW II byrds is that my kites are much much smaller. Ts II was different than the one on top.
And here I think you have your answer. Tsunami was sadly lost in a fatal accident not exactly related to it´s design (IIRC) but it failed miserably to live up to it´s designers hopes on the race course. The above is from memory since I was heavily interested in Reno racers in 1990-1998, so I might have something wrong.
When RareBear got the 528 MPH world record, I remember reading at the time, that this was just as fast as any piston engined aircraft was likely to go due to propeller efficency at high speed. Now, I´m not an expert on these things, but I think your first stop would be to design a propeller that can cope with such high speeds, have it installed on RareBear and have a go at the 528 MPH record. If she betters it with your propeller, then design a new aircraft behind the prop and smash the record in a big time.
At the end of the day, all such record attemts need to have a supurb engine running great. As has been seen with RareBear, that is not always the case. Getting the right combination of engine, airframe and propeller is going to empty your wallet really, really fast. And when you think you have got it just right for the big day, one of the three is going to let you down big time!
If you have the time, energy and a bottomless pit of money, go for it. Be prepare for a big disappointment though. Messing around with an unknown airframe, unknown engine and unknown propeller is going to be expensive!
I also think this has a change, but like I stated above…far beyond my purse’s cubature !
I recall Tsunami did one pass at 541 mph in Reno while trying for the 3 km record.
Tailplane blanking by the main wing at certain AoA looks like a real possibility
Are you mixing up the TS II and “Roadrunner” ? I added an older R3-A…the original design and a new 2-seater version ( just in case a customer needs a jet pilot to teach how to fly the vehicle ).
Dick Dale…Nitro !
Dick Dale…Nitro !
the wing looks too far forward to me…
Wing is highly swept ( less than in a Roadrunner )…but you may be right..I don’t have BoM based calculations of it.
Can see a potential for less than favourable AoA characteristics on Tigershark II
Do you mean the visibility at high AoA approach ?
Fascinating! Can we have a pic of the Roadrunner in plan?
Reminds me a little of the Bugatti racer –
I am flattered.
No I drew the new sketch last nite…but we could in the future.
For TS II I made model few years ago.
i would certainly like to see more on your aircraft 🙂
is the tigershark loosely based on a mustang?
It is a Mustang concept with all ammo and guns away…like Tsunami was.
Here is something new too.
Pusher is a taildagger. TS II is a Tsunami like speedster.
I redrew the R3-A5 ( one of my older designs from 2002 ) and here are the results:
Wots wit the stab ?
John Fricker did a great article in the old Air Enthuiast magazine during the BD-5 sales/hype period of the 70s questioning its performance goals…and most of what he said came to pass. I don’t think the factory ever got its powertrain system working as promised…even after selling thousands of kits.
It is very interesting to see that both Micro-Imp and BD-5 were supposed to fly with 38-40 hp ( Citroen and Hirth ) engines and both failed in this respect.
This leaves me wondering was there a wrong engine choise or was the engine not cooled properly.
Here is also something rather new…the orbital engine or the axial vector engine: http://www.strangenewproducts.com/2005/08/axial-vector-engine.html
When traditional aviation engine produce 1 hp/kilo AVE can do 4 hp/kilo ( or could do ).
Hirsch-M.Aé.R.C. H-100 research plane from France
Cool looking two seater…I wonder if with spinners it could have gone 400 km/h instead of 330 km/h ?
These pushers are appearing every now and then.
Here is new french 2-seater LH-10 ( 4,5 m2 wingarea ) the main wheel stays down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpmvstZuolA&feature=related
Piloted by a combat pilot with 3 000 hours with 15 different types of planes.
Lotsa aspect ratio.
😎
———-
LF 2100 was too far ahead of this time.
This here shows how well it was studied.
http://www.protonet.org/doc/LearFan_gearbox_4_A4.pdf
———-
Molton Taylor Mini-Imp Cutaway shows some general arrangements.
http://www.mini-imp.com/cutaway.htm
Gear is very interesting. It retracts into the wing.
http://www.mini-imp.com/images/Flightpic.jpg
Specs for 60 and 100 hp engines:
http://www.mini-imp.com/news.htm
The 0-200 recommended for Imp is 230 lbs wih all:
http://www.weebeastie.com/hatzcb1/motorO200.html
That is about the same weight than my whole ac almost.
No wonder also Micro-Imp was undeway.
That Zombies was superb.
You really got me now; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvyDWGF290M&feature=related
How about the original Batman tune;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qPckHLmq-g&NR=1
…..” Where does he get all those wondelful toys ? “: by Joker ( Jack Nicholson ) 🙂
That Zombies was superb.
You really got me now; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvyDWGF290M&feature=related
How about the original Batman tune;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qPckHLmq-g&NR=1
…..” Where does he get all those wondelful toys ? “: by Joker ( Jack Nicholson ) 🙂
..nice..CGI ?