dark light

topspeed

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 2,657 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Electric fighter aeroplane ? #2154301
    topspeed
    Participant

    Then we can comfortably agree that Sopwith Triplane was a drone ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIdtRZK3YO4

    in reply to: Electric fighter aeroplane ? #2154309
    topspeed
    Participant

    Kurt Tank high altitude interceptor is just an example what high flying does to the speed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTUha-wVsq0

    in reply to: Electric fighter aeroplane ? #2154313
    topspeed
    Participant

    Spudman WP…you are missing the point…no aircraft with GE F414-400 can cruise at 30 km where Helios flew….with ancient solar panels etc.

    in reply to: Electric fighter aeroplane ? #2154321
    topspeed
    Participant

    Top speed of the SI II is 140 km/h…but as it cruises just 1/4 of the max engine power it goes 50 mph. It cannot even even utilize the whole solar power it gets from the panels as its engines are rated so low….let alone add any from the batteries in addition to the solar current.

    in reply to: Electric fighter aeroplane ? #2154329
    topspeed
    Participant

    Yes Spudman…I have done the research and that is why I am confident to pronounce such a bald statement.

    This was 50+ km/h faster than P-51D; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-Wulf_Ta_152

    It flew only at 15 km altitude.

    Helios from NASA flew 7 x faster at 30 km than in sea level.

    Furthermore the Solar Impulse II is able to fly 2 x faster than Solar Impulse I….with ridiculously low power carrying 600 kg batteries for night flying.

    in reply to: Electric fighter aeroplane ? #2154359
    topspeed
    Participant

    No Finny !

    I quite agree with the aforecommented persons with the low energy density of the electric propulsion. OTOH there is a way to drop down the wingloading and thus reach quite high speeds at high using solar energy with battery power…very high that is ( and I don’t mean “high” induced by drugs ).

    Such aerodynes are merely observation platforms of some kind or perhaps just airborne drones or satellite substituting links…..and so forth…in near future…perhaps even passenger airliners of some sort.

    in reply to: General Discussion #237132
    topspeed
    Participant

    My condolences for the families of these innocent victims.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239453
    topspeed
    Participant

    Here is the actual space ship. Braking system idea.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239653
    topspeed
    Participant

    Then grinding again….elevator moved back and nose shortened.

    Who wants to see the side view ?

    in reply to: General Discussion #239796
    topspeed
    Participant

    Sharpening the concept a bit.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239813
    topspeed
    Participant

    Igniting…in english…if you insist.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239818
    topspeed
    Participant

    This enables 35 km ( 110 000 ft ) drop altitude. Thus M2 before inginting the engines.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239856
    topspeed
    Participant

    Here is the engine that it needs 18 pieces.

    Siemens 260 kW.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceplane

    in reply to: General Discussion #239986
    topspeed
    Participant

    Stars are closing us fast with DS¤G; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-Stage_4-Grid

    ISP is 21 500 s !!!!

    Using DS4G + the solar panels on my system and the new smaller rocket inside the Solar Eagle the delta -v can be even 206 -250 depending how much Xenon you can afford…heck even1000 km/s ( if as much volume as normal rocket fuel takes as liquid xenon is 16,4 x more dense).

    Yes yes yes ! We are to chasing the ” impossible “. ( Proxima Centaur system )

    in reply to: General Discussion #240018
    topspeed
    Participant

    To make that design soar with less energy it was tweaked like this.

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 2,657 total)