More of my space oddities can be found here; http://spacefellowship.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=12813&sid=46d244f099e65d4fd6243863487c9d8e
Few percent size increase to get a man on the mars surface on back to Earth.
This brings feasability to the ” 3XD” Project.
Ludicrous speed explained; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygE01sOhzz0
Mars flying and space travelling cannot become any cheaper than this.
System may cost three fold compared to jet fighter, but that is still pretty cheap as one launch of the space shuttle cost 450 000 000 US dollars.
An another comparison share light about its economical aspects that come with the “small” size.
This has a landing gear it needs.
I’ll explain a bit more.
This is not able to land on Mars as it is.
But packing everything tightly with solar panels and all.
This has gotta be the way of the future for space travel for years to come ( MPDT ).
This is a good intro too; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HESOat2iPzU
I got a kick outa this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJppeRWSD94
Only the second stage booster is not reusable…all others are. Or would be.
This is very lite and small but all numbers add up nicely.
This can speed up into 11.1 km/s speed with chemical rockets and then an additional 219 km/s with Xenon ( 500 kg ).
I watched a 3-wheeler review in YouTube they praised the Morgan…but it is 80 000 usd. Pretty pricey.
As a somewhat desperate attempt to market my ecological 3-wheeler I designed a interstellar space ship with capability to orbit the Mars. It could be driven on MARS as it has a windmill to recharge the batteries.
The ambition and inventions of this doctor actually also laid ground to the rocketry that both Russia and USA uses today ( and all space exploring nations ).
who makes better aircraft drawings
Topspeed
or
Paralay?
I make space craft concepts. 1000 km/s reaching. Paralay can draw a nice PAKFA.
Tsiolkowski, Goddard and von Braun did also contribute in space exploration.