dark light

ppp

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 1,656 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386328
    ppp
    Participant

    Think you might be confusing it with the Shadow… Sentinel is the final outcome of experiments that started with the CASTOR Islander in the 80’s…

    Zeb

    Exactly, Shadow is a small UAV, Sentinel R1 is this beast…

    http://media.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_ASTOR_Sentinel_R1_lg.jpg

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386340
    ppp
    Participant

    As far as amphibious forces…

    2 Carriers/LHA scrapped
    1 Bay Class LPD(A) scrapped
    1 Albion LPD put into reserve

    this leaves…

    2 Carriers/LHA
    1 Albion LPD
    3 Bay Class LPD(A)
    8 Point Class LST

    in reply to: Ark Royal and Invincible #2024069
    ppp
    Participant

    nah – they probably already have more than us.

    Suffice to say, India won’t be getting a free carrier, so don’t worry your little head about it.

    Also, why are you flying a naval flag when you are clearly favouring India over the UK, you filthy traitor you 😀

    in reply to: Ark Royal and Invincible #2024075
    ppp
    Participant

    The knowledge that at least some one is using them.

    LMFAO! Priceless!

    Want to give them a few hundred nukes too?

    in reply to: Ark Royal and Invincible #2024080
    ppp
    Participant

    So what does the UK get out the deal?

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386476
    ppp
    Participant

    Your right not to trust the Irish! They are just itching to launch an attack!

    Though in all seriousness, Northern Ireland has zero fighter cover of its own and the British mainland provides cover for the South too. A base in Wales could provide that cover, and supplement cover for the South West. Oh but no, Scotland needs its full 5 squdrons!

    in reply to: UK to ditch F-35B for F-35C? #2386489
    ppp
    Participant

    Re Dogfight: that’s what people thought before Vietnam, and why have these extraordinarily maneovreable fighters if not for dogfighting and why a gun/infra-red sights on Typhoon/Flanker and all those short range AAMs if not for dogfighting?

    The Tornado will work at 25kft but the common view is that it’s a bit of a brick up there which is what you’d expect for an aeroplane that was designed for 0ft.

    The other part of my post concerning Harrier has been vindicated. Always a novelty, but useful in a limited way, now it will go. I am surprised about the retention of the Tornado as I am about the carriers without aeroplanes to put on them.

    Regards

    Indeed, retainment of Tornado at least gives some home for a UCAV programme. Harriers replacement is secure, even if its not a STOVL aircraft and only in similar numbers to Sea Harrier.

    Also, hopefully there is some news on the SSNs, nobody seems to be mentioning them, despite them being critical to our projection and defence.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386500
    ppp
    Participant

    That’s not actually true.

    Scotland is much more sparsely populated than England, with less congested airspace and much more open space available for training.

    Yet wales has no front line fighter or strike squadrons… and RAF Leuchars is about 7 miles from Dundee, and 16 from Glenrothes.

    You’re trolling.

    You don’t need more aircraft to defend a space because there are more people in it.

    You’ve not addressed the several other reasons (e.g. proximity to airspace for training) already put to you.

    Ahh yes, so when I don’t come around to your opinion, I’m a troll. Don’t worry, I’m used to that line of argument! In fact, Marc Sampaix has reminded me for about 6 years that I am a pathetic troll, I should go play orange and lemon with Jon Jake because we both are failures like the Eurofighter, that my mother is this that and the other. Really, you’re wasting your time trying to insult me into accepting your opinion over my own, you’ll just drive yourself insane trying, just like he did 🙂

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386538
    ppp
    Participant

    Scotland that “tiny part of the UK” makes up almost one third of the UK landmass, and last time I checked covered the entire North of the UK.

    So lets look at your argument again.
    1/3 of UK = 5 Squadron
    2/3 of UK = 10 or 11 Squadrons

    Looks perfectly in proportion to me, and that’s not a political view, it would be my laymans interpretation of strategic spreading out assets

    They can have the Typhoon squadron for defence for sure, but there is no advantage in putting 4 strike squadrons in Scotland other than jobs. Besides, defence is there to defend the population, so if you want to play that game, the rest of the UK is 11 times more deserving of fighter/striker defences than Scotland, and so should have 11 times more 🙂

    While I love the concept of Taranis, I’m not totally sold on it’s application as a deep strike platform in the next 15 years at least. That’s assuming the programme survives today, it might not, and if it does it might simply be temrinated or drip fed puny funds once it’s int he air in 2011. Also, in order to get ‘son of Taranis’ to some form of operational use, won’t we have to overhaul huge amounts of our communications infrastructure, form ground stations to satellites? In this brave new world, I can see that getting an **** kicking.

    As for B vs C, since B is already a huge improvement on the Harrier, does the longer legs of the C matter so much? What of the contract we signed for the 3 B test craft?

    No, even the US uses commercial sats. Besides, the only thing that takes large data connections is video recon, the actual commands can be made to go down connections with negligable speeds.

    in reply to: Ark Royal and Invincible #2024125
    ppp
    Participant

    Maybe we could give them the Ark and some Harriers in return for a swing towards Typhoon in MRCA?

    I assume there is no chance of shifting a few of the Tornadoes to anyone though.

    Oh boy, so you want to give 4 free Type 23 to Brazil and 1 carrier and the Harrier fleet to India. Wow, generous man. I guess you’d like international aid doubled or tripled too?

    yes give them Ark Royal.

    India is going to be the biggest arms buyer over the next 10 years and we need to sweeten them up.

    If they hadn’t developed their own MBT or were so desperate to have one matcht he west I would say offer them the Chall 2’s we dont need. We give them Ark they buy 100 Challs.

    Not really, it will just make us look weak, and make getting a good price for anything near impossible (assuming we have anything left to sell after Grim gives it all away for free).

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386625
    ppp
    Participant

    Considering we spend less than 1% on science in the UK its bloody massive.

    Is that a fair comparison though? Is that 1% consisting of research and development, or does it include education too? And government procurements of products from scientific industries too? Because the MoD budget includes research and development and procurement!

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386629
    ppp
    Participant

    Better, that’s correct, but not good at all. I still don’t believe that it would be made into a 66kt, 3 Billion pound, LPH.

    Except that it was planned, from the start, to be used as either an LPH or a CVA.

    Cameron is going to announce the cuts at 15:30.

    If the Nimrods really are to go it’s the final gem in the crown of insanity that sits on the MOD’s head, but then again I can’t say much would surprise me any more.

    I feel just about fired up to start some kind of public campaign about this, if anything they should be INCREASING the defense spend.

    Well the general thing seems to be a few departments get vast amounts of money from Labour, then under the Conservatives all the departments get cut to pay for it. In fact, health, which got many billions in increases under the last parliament is getting ANOTHER rise. That would be all well and good, but the service is not really reflecting the money, much of it went on wages, and the NHS is still management heavy and clinical staff short. Paying existing doctors more does not more doctors make, in fact it reduces the number of doctor hours available as they take more time off!!! 😡

    But you would, presumably, accept that there have been several years of grossly inept financial control within the MoD and service chiefs have been allowed to fund irresponsibly.

    So now those days are over and the country has to live within its means. I totally disagree with how the cuts are being reportedly planned but am holding my powder dry until we actually have the full defence picture today and the spending review tomorrow and then finally the speculation and leaks are over and we can debate the facts.

    The bureaucrats are still likely to worm their way out of the cuts. I sincerely I hope they cut at least 30% of every bureaucrat division in each department.

    Not so insane.

    Since you are here, and I do hate to go slightly off topic here, but do you have any estimates for the the RCS of Taranis? I’ve seen your RADAR and RCS tables (which you were bashed for on F16.net), so was curious as to your view.

    No, it’s to do with geographical area, cost of land, availability of uncluttered airspace for training, proximity to the routes which intruding aircraft take, etc.

    Scotland has 9% of the population of the UK, but almost 33% of the land area, & that land is more spread out than the rest, because of the outlying islands.

    Just like the proximity of the carrier workshare to Gordon Brown’s constituency has no relation, right? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2024190
    ppp
    Participant

    I thought the whole reason they weren’t going to get catapults in the first place was to keep costs down? Now there’s no money and cats are being installed?

    Defence review: HMS Ark Royal to be scrapped

    Well the fact that there’s around 80 planes less than planned should free up the cash.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386725
    ppp
    Participant

    The first CVF as an LPH? That’s insanity!

    But better than scrapping it or selling it. Plus that way if we ever want a second carrier, we can just refit the QE.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386738
    ppp
    Participant

    WTF they can’t seriously consider using QE soley as an LPH it’s a £2-3bn super carrier not an LPH. A new LPH could be bought to replace ocean in 2020 for probably around £500m this government seems to be an even bigger waster of the defence budget than the last one and thats saying something.

    Much better than selling a £2-£3 billion supercarrier to India for £1 billion!

    My guess is that the Daily Telegraph has taken a bit of pointless down the pub speculation on selling off QE as true, as the reality is that when PoW needs a refit and is out service for months that they will rotate QE back into service just as they planned.

    What is more worrying is what are they going do with 2 squadrons of FAA fast jet pilots (Current 800 NAS and the 12 pilots training in the US to stand up 801 NAS)?

    Oh very possible, the papers are useless for fact, some are still talking about the 250 Eurofighters. What is possible is that QE will enter service as a STOVL carrier without Harriers, PoW will then enter service as a CATOBAR carrier. QE will then either enter refit for CATOBAR, or may just have its ramp removed (assuming they still fit one now).

    Pilots will just be reassigned to other aircraft.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 1,656 total)