There are three houses on my very short street with them 😀
Is it a nuclear EMP missile? 😎
I don’t read papers. I usually just go on BBC news website, it’s very biased towards the left, but then I’m only I’m only looking up simple news facts so it doesn’t make much difference to me.
I don’t read papers. I usually just go on BBC news website, it’s very biased towards the left, but then I’m only I’m only looking up simple news facts so it doesn’t make much difference to me.
@Lincoln 7
Generally the only people I hear complaining about the Daily Mail are Labour and Lib Dem supporters. Always strikes me as a lazy way out, kind of like calling someone a “racist”, attempting to win an argument without actually providing any credible counter-argument.
@Lincoln 7
Generally the only people I hear complaining about the Daily Mail are Labour and Lib Dem supporters. Always strikes me as a lazy way out, kind of like calling someone a “racist”, attempting to win an argument without actually providing any credible counter-argument.
Good to see you told him to sling his hook! My advice would be to provoke them by putting up a bigger flag, much bigger, and perhaps send a letter saying you refuse to take the flag down. Lots of people near me have flags up, many have them all year round, so I doubt the council would get very far!
The rules on what you can do on your own property need to be changed significantly. They should effectively be whatever you want unless it can be proven that it will cause significant negative effects for others.
@J Boyle
Target
Good to see you told him to sling his hook! My advice would be to provoke them by putting up a bigger flag, much bigger, and perhaps send a letter saying you refuse to take the flag down. Lots of people near me have flags up, many have them all year round, so I doubt the council would get very far!
The rules on what you can do on your own property need to be changed significantly. They should effectively be whatever you want unless it can be proven that it will cause significant negative effects for others.
@J Boyle
Target
lol 😀
lol 😀
We know what you think John, no need to keep repeating yourself.
:diablo: to be able to completly immune to EMP the electronic equipment must be isolated from the environment for example Vacuum tube :p modern semiconductor devices are very easy to be destroyed by the electromagnetic pulse :diablo: so i think most modern AESA , PESA radar will be disabled by EMP
That isn’t talking about EMP hardened semiconductors. Also most semiconductors are isolated from the environment using resin compounds, instead of glass, so by your own admission they must also be EMP hardened 😉
@Jonesy
Completely agree. Also there seems to be a worrying trend of people forecasting “there won’t be anymore big wars” usually followed shortly by a massive war. Resources could be a big factor as you say, if they could take them by force then they could be tempted to do so.
@Frosty
I would point out that John gave no source for the 8 missiles figure he quoted. I’ve else seen 10 and 14 quoted in previous debates on this issue, so there is no reason to suspect his figure is any more correct! We should have enough missiles left to fill 2 subs completely, and probably a 3rd, not that deployment rotation would permit unless one was armed in dock. On warheads, the stockpile has gone down, but production capacity has gone up.
But John, the government also identified the SSBNs as the preferred option and explicitly ruled out your own proposal. You can’t pick and choose, govt is either right or wrong, but you can’t just pick the bits that suit you, else the source offers no support to your position at all 😎
@John K
If you’re going to go with such a large number of TLAM then you’d be able to afford the Trident instead. A couple tens of TLAM could certainly be defended against with air defences without ridiculous expenditure.