dark light

ppp

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,656 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fly the Flag! #1846760
    ppp
    Participant

    There are three houses on my very short street with them 😀

    in reply to: infrared anti ship missile effectiveness #1792668
    ppp
    Participant

    Is it a nuclear EMP missile? 😎

    in reply to: General Discussion #256890
    ppp
    Participant

    I don’t read papers. I usually just go on BBC news website, it’s very biased towards the left, but then I’m only I’m only looking up simple news facts so it doesn’t make much difference to me.

    in reply to: What do YOU…….. #1846816
    ppp
    Participant

    I don’t read papers. I usually just go on BBC news website, it’s very biased towards the left, but then I’m only I’m only looking up simple news facts so it doesn’t make much difference to me.

    in reply to: General Discussion #257232
    ppp
    Participant

    @Lincoln 7

    Generally the only people I hear complaining about the Daily Mail are Labour and Lib Dem supporters. Always strikes me as a lazy way out, kind of like calling someone a “racist”, attempting to win an argument without actually providing any credible counter-argument.

    in reply to: Red tape gone stupid #1847052
    ppp
    Participant

    @Lincoln 7

    Generally the only people I hear complaining about the Daily Mail are Labour and Lib Dem supporters. Always strikes me as a lazy way out, kind of like calling someone a “racist”, attempting to win an argument without actually providing any credible counter-argument.

    in reply to: General Discussion #257296
    ppp
    Participant

    Good to see you told him to sling his hook! My advice would be to provoke them by putting up a bigger flag, much bigger, and perhaps send a letter saying you refuse to take the flag down. Lots of people near me have flags up, many have them all year round, so I doubt the council would get very far!

    The rules on what you can do on your own property need to be changed significantly. They should effectively be whatever you want unless it can be proven that it will cause significant negative effects for others.

    @J Boyle

    Target

    in reply to: Red tape gone stupid #1847120
    ppp
    Participant

    Good to see you told him to sling his hook! My advice would be to provoke them by putting up a bigger flag, much bigger, and perhaps send a letter saying you refuse to take the flag down. Lots of people near me have flags up, many have them all year round, so I doubt the council would get very far!

    The rules on what you can do on your own property need to be changed significantly. They should effectively be whatever you want unless it can be proven that it will cause significant negative effects for others.

    @J Boyle

    Target

    in reply to: General Discussion #257334
    ppp
    Participant

    lol 😀

    in reply to: Queen's Jubilee #1847144
    ppp
    Participant

    lol 😀

    in reply to: Trident Replacement thread #2017288
    ppp
    Participant

    We know what you think John, no need to keep repeating yourself.

    in reply to: F-35 nuclear ability #2299784
    ppp
    Participant

    :diablo: to be able to completly immune to EMP the electronic equipment must be isolated from the environment for example Vacuum tube :p modern semiconductor devices are very easy to be destroyed by the electromagnetic pulse :diablo: so i think most modern AESA , PESA radar will be disabled by EMP

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon_yield

    That isn’t talking about EMP hardened semiconductors. Also most semiconductors are isolated from the environment using resin compounds, instead of glass, so by your own admission they must also be EMP hardened 😉

    in reply to: Trident Replacement thread #2017357
    ppp
    Participant

    @Jonesy
    Completely agree. Also there seems to be a worrying trend of people forecasting “there won’t be anymore big wars” usually followed shortly by a massive war. Resources could be a big factor as you say, if they could take them by force then they could be tempted to do so.

    @Frosty
    I would point out that John gave no source for the 8 missiles figure he quoted. I’ve else seen 10 and 14 quoted in previous debates on this issue, so there is no reason to suspect his figure is any more correct! We should have enough missiles left to fill 2 subs completely, and probably a 3rd, not that deployment rotation would permit unless one was armed in dock. On warheads, the stockpile has gone down, but production capacity has gone up.

    in reply to: Trident Replacement thread #2017371
    ppp
    Participant

    But John, the government also identified the SSBNs as the preferred option and explicitly ruled out your own proposal. You can’t pick and choose, govt is either right or wrong, but you can’t just pick the bits that suit you, else the source offers no support to your position at all 😎

    in reply to: Trident Replacement thread #2017397
    ppp
    Participant

    @John K

    If you’re going to go with such a large number of TLAM then you’d be able to afford the Trident instead. A couple tens of TLAM could certainly be defended against with air defences without ridiculous expenditure.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,656 total)