dark light

Phixer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 281 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wheel ID help! #1296314
    Phixer
    Participant

    I have an aircraft wheel which I’m told is post war and British,but so far no one has any firm info on what type it is from.
    Garry.

    A picture may help.

    in reply to: Tiger Moth (?) at Duxford today, info please. #1296655
    Phixer
    Participant

    Are those ‘bone domes’ looking slightly out of place on a 1930’s classic?:D

    Maybe they do but they are a sensible precaution, I had to wear one see:

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=69172&page=2

    I am in the front.

    BTW Is that Charlie Brown (Hurricane and Spit’ pilot) in the front of N-6720.

    Smashing aircraft to fly in.

    in reply to: Swarm of bees forces aircraft to turn back. #527964
    Phixer
    Participant

    Never heard of this happening before. Glad they got down safe.

    FlyBe no doubt.:D

    Whatever airline it was, how irresponsible! Do they not appreciate that there is a current shortage of bees.;)

    in reply to: Aircraft crashed in UK waters #1297620
    Phixer
    Participant

    Quite a few Lightnings at “RAF” Doggerbank….

    You see, we always knew that the RAF should have let us have more carriers! 😀

    in reply to: Would you stand under this plane?! #528634
    Phixer
    Participant

    Guess this is the one you are thinking of, D-ABZY!:D

    http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1415398/

    Ouch!:eek:

    Shows how comparatively fragile civil jets are.

    in reply to: Aircraft crashed in UK waters #1298619
    Phixer
    Participant

    Hi

    does anyone have any info, whether real or anecdotal about any aircraft which have crashed in UK lakes or coastal areas.
    Thanks

    Hunter GA11 crashed into the Solent on 1st November 1972 but did not stay there so I guess that may not interest you.

    in reply to: Help With Upgrading To A DSLR #455064
    Phixer
    Participant

    Regrettably my 100-300 lens is unserviceable, so the camera is unusuitable for aviation photography any longer, and I don’t intend spending any more money on it. I have two smaller lenses, so the camera will be fine for portraits and such.

    Have you considered looking at second hand. I have noticed a number of Minolta zooms in the 75-300mm range recently. Indeed I picked up a very useful Sigma EX of that range with a proper Macro feature for under a ton recently. Yes I have read as far as your satement about finances and have genuine empathy by being in a similar boat. Lack of shooting oportunities by not being able to drive myself around anymore frustrate me.

    I also picked up a second hand Minolta f8 Reflex 500 which on the Sony Alpha or Dynax 7D is brilliant as I no longer have the physical strength to aim the monstrous 50-500mm zoom all over the sky.

    I have to save carefully to be able to take advantage of these second hand offerings and this is why I have not given in and moved to Canon or Nikon. It is a shame that Minolta are out of the picture as IMHO (with the exception of the size of range of lenses) they produced better kit.

    Incidentally, I started taking photographs in about 1974 – with a Zorki 4K- click. I doubt you’ll find anything from that period that requires as much attention to take pictures, as that does. The Minolta could never surpass the quality of photographs I took with that…

    That Zorki is one interesting looking camera. I started in 1967 with a cheap Halina 35mm with an unreliable built in light meter (I soon bought a Weston Master V which I still have) and fixed lens, there are two shots on my web site taken with this, Simons Sircus and Hunter T8s + Bucc’ and Harvard on the line at Heron Flight in 68.

    Then in 68 I purchased my first SRT101 – brilliant for its day, better than any Canon at that time and I still have one which works OK, also an X700.

    in reply to: Help With Upgrading To A DSLR #455167
    Phixer
    Participant

    Is there any preference with regards film/iso that I should try that works well…

    I would look at Fuji Provia 400F, this can be pushed by 1 or 2 stops, i.e. 800 and 1600 ISO(3 stops were advertised at one time but not recommended).

    I had one of those film tidy bags from Lowepro with three compartments and a pouch.

    I had saved some old Kodak film canisters and used these labelled with 800 or 1600 to take the exposed cassets to prevent processing mistakes.

    A good processing company? Can I specify RAW or will I only get jpegs?

    I would have thought TIFF would be best but then I only ever had my film returned uncut (this after sloppy work at one processor when frames were cut short and on a slant at that) and cut and scan my own.

    I wouldn’t mind betting that you could obtain a good second hand film scanner at a reasonable price. If you do look for one with ICE, ROC and GEM facilities of which I find the first two useful at times, but then I do have some 40 year old images.

    Glad to hear of somebody still willing to give film a go. I often think that at some point in the not to distant future there will be a shortage of pictures of this period when most digital images taken have been lost through corruption, media failure or lack of hardware as standards move on.

    in reply to: Would you stand under this plane?! #529093
    Phixer
    Participant

    Whether an aircraft weighs 100 tons or 40 tons it makes little difference when it falls on your head.

    Consider the situation at sea on a carrier where jacking heavy jets is a matter of routine, and yes the undercarriage does make a racket when it houses.

    More worrying than jacking an F4K at sea was carrying out the nose-undercarriage leg emergency shrink test, where pneumatics were used in place of the normal hydraulic method.

    For this most lashings had to be removed because of the amount of rotation and the violance of the movement as the leg shrank. The guy in the cockpit, to operate the selector, was instructed to close the canopies – to prevent the mechanism sheering and him being ejected from the cockpit. The leg shrank so rapidly that the nose of the A/C appeared suspended in the air for a moment. Then gravity took charge and the nose would come down contacting the deck with force enough to lift the main wheels off the deck, sometimes over the chocks.

    At sea, in a cramped hangar this was always ‘fun’.:D

    in reply to: Which Aircraft would you most like to fly in ? #1299953
    Phixer
    Participant

    Having done:

    T22 glider
    Sea Prince
    Sea Venom
    Sea Vixen
    Meteor T7
    Hunter T8
    Sea King
    Sea Devon
    Sea Heron
    Tiger Moth

    I would like another fling in a Hunter but I think my heart condition rules me out, even if I could stump up the cash, so I would plump for a Sopwith 1½ Strutter.

    As I don’t think there is a Strutter flying I’ll settle for a ‘Brisfit’ or another few trips in a Tiger Moth. It is amazing what a different feel an open cockpit gives to the experience and a ‘plane light enough to feel the turbulance even on fairly calm day. More like steering a boat with a tiller, except one can see what the water is doing ahead – do not over-control otherwise PIO sets in.

    in reply to: Hunter "Miss Demeanour" #1300344
    Phixer
    Participant

    I visited Lee-on-Solent for the first time yesterday and thought of that very incident. I didn’t come across any traffic lights though 😉

    It often comes to my mind for it was the aircraft that I alluded to in that earlier post. I had strapped the pilot in and signalled start (first cartridge :)) then waved him out with the customary salute.

    I had a grilling at the Board of Enquiry but after a few months with nagging worries, although I had nothing that I knew I should have worried about, at least the canopy cleared I having caried out the jettison checks that very morning, but one always wonders on these occasions.

    All ‘the Board’ asked me about was the take off and my views as to how it compared with others I had watched and at what points, by line of sight, rotation first took place and then where the aircraft was when I heard the engine wind down and the nosewheel drop to the runway.

    in reply to: Hunter "Miss Demeanour" #1300791
    Phixer
    Participant

    I remember visiting the fire section at RAF Chivenor, duirng summer camp as a cadet in (about) 1968/9.

    A Hunter was taking off, when it’s engine spluttered died and within about 2 seconds started again.

    Probably an engine surge where blow-off valves were not optimally set. Could have been FOD but I doubt that the Hunter would have continued the climb-out and returned safely.

    Is this a regular occurence with Hunters,…

    Not by that date.

    …and what would the pilot have done to get it going again so quickly?

    Prayed.

    No seriously, not much. He may have pulled the throttle back a tad, waited for engine stability before advancing the throttle again. However, myself not being a fly-boy he may have taken other actions.

    If the engine had not picked up his only option would have been an abort, particularly if his wheels were still on the deck in which case he would not have been able to rely on banging out as the seats were only cleared (well this applied to the GAs and T8s I knew) to 90 knots and above at ground level.

    This is why ‘Toffee’ Sharp was lucky to escape serious injury when he ejected out of GA11 WV381 on 1 November 1972 at Lee-on-Solent.

    in reply to: Hunter "Miss Demeanour" #1301179
    Phixer
    Participant

    Just off the top of my head…

    …GA.11 XE685

    I put the Harley light in the nose of that back in the 1970s also her near sister XE689.

    Hunter much preferred for working to either the Sea Vixen or Phantom which could be brutes at times.

    Although the Hunter could have its interesting moments like the one I fixed a Harley light to and looked after and readied for its return flight to Yeovilton but the pilot aborted the take off and it splashed into the Solent.

    Then there was the time when a CPO on Heron Flight had fun on an engine start. I was working mostly on the Hunters on the flight at the time and this particular T8 had returned from a sortie and been snagged for engine vibration (there had been an ‘interesting’ situation developing with the engine’s turbine at that time).

    The aircraft had just been refuelled so the cut down forty-gallon drum on a small wheeled trolley used to collect overflows was still under the aircraft. I was walking out of the hanger towards the aircraft with a brace of CO2 extinguishers in my hands when, having watched the CPO’s head bobbing about as he did a cockpit check, I was horrified to see, and hear, the cartridge starter in action as the start button was operated by Chieffie in cockpit.

    The cartridge exhaust dumped straight into the fuel bin vapourising the fuel and with the engine winding up a cloud of fuel vapour was drawn quickly forward straight down the intakes. By this time I was frantically signalling a cut but Chieffie was clearly too occupied by his astonishment at the JPT gauge suddenly registering a higher than normal value at that point in the start cycle.

    Fortunately the quantity of fuel in the bin had absorbed all the heat in the starter exhaust and there was no fire.

    Just one of many tales of fun and games.

    in reply to: Red Bull Sea Vixen. No more sponsorship. #1302005
    Phixer
    Participant

    Ask any member of the public to name ten aircraft and you might get Harrier,Tornado,Vulcan,Cessna,Jumbo Jet etc – I somewhat doubt that
    anyone could even name the Sea Vixen in the first twenty !
    That’s why money doesnt flock to it.

    Maybe, but my experience is that more people than one may think have heard of the Sea Vixen. Besides some of us aim to change that and it has been a popular attraction at air displays over the last few years.

    Why be so negative?

    in reply to: F22 and one method of exiting cockpit #2526507
    Phixer
    Participant

    I typed in “Raptor canopy” and the thread came right up.

    Well lucky you. Amongst other combo’s I used F22 and cockpit and got up a list of threads, started working through and didn’t find anything then had an incoming ‘phone call necessitating a scan session and email send diversion and after decided to post it.

    Pleased to see that someone else was not aware of it previously, not that much of a surprise.

    So instead of jumping on somebody why not just politely supply a link, after all most of us live a life outside of this forum and/or haven’t been around here for ever.

    Never mind, takes all sorts I guess. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 281 total)