dark light

Phixer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 281 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: XH558 Urgent need for cash #1310138
    Phixer
    Participant

    😀 😀 😀 Er… who are these ‘most’ of whom you speak?

    Moggy

    He means Bjorn Lomborg, at a guess who’s book ‘The Skeptical Environmentalist’ I see is back on the book stores’ shelves, where it should be left IMHO.

    Lomborg has a very myopic take on the issues IMO and his message is looking increasingly out of kilter with scientific findings and real experience.

    in reply to: XH558 Urgent need for cash #1310142
    Phixer
    Participant

    I remember growing up when the Vulcan was in it’s prime circa early seventies ! Was Britain really that ‘Great’ ? I remember the winter blackouts-

    Your history is a little skewed. By the early seventies the Vulcans were past their prime having been relegated from the first division of nuclear deterrence by missile armed sub’s.

    I too recall the winter blackouts, and also the prospects of my near future deployment with the ‘green godesses’ as the reserve, dangerous, fire engines were called (luckily my involvment with some priority trials installations on naval aircraft kept me out of that as it turned out).

    Also the Great part of Great Britain came about considerably before that 1970s period.

    Now as for getting this Vulcan into the air I consider this a most worthy project that should be supported by the organisation that has gained so much from past achievments in the aviation industry.

    Yes, considering the amount of taxpayers money BAe Systems, and defence procurement in general through many privatisation scams (which could open a whole can of worms but see my reference at [1]) I should think they have a bonded duty to support the Vulcan venture, and the Vixen one too, if only by covering operating costs other than spares.

    [1] What I am referring to here is the woefull story of self interest that runs through this business like mycelium through mouldy cheese ranted about by Lewis Page in his ‘Lions Donkeys and Dinosaurs: Waste and Blundering in the Military’ which is a must read for any interested in defence matters.

    Darn it. I have been logged out again, yet again, whilst composing a reply. Why is this?

    in reply to: Kemble Petition #435517
    Phixer
    Participant

    I signed the petition earlier whilst involved with exchanging points of view with exmpa. I would like to thank that gentleman for adding urgency to my action there.:D

    Phixer
    Participant

    Actually Phixer, that is a landing shot and I have no idea why it’s open.

    Brian

    In that case perhaps it had been practicing AAR and the mechanism had jammed open.

    Phixer
    Participant

    That will be the aar refuelling receptacle. I wonder why it’s open on take off…

    I wondered if it was the AAR socket (the F4s I worked on had probes – frightened the life out of a greenie in the cockpit once when testing the emergency retract on this in spite of the said greenie being warned:D ) but it being open on take off puzzled me also.

    in reply to: German Phantoms Burn Coal. RAF Lossiemouth 2/3 May 07 #2533230
    Phixer
    Participant

    What is that trap open on the spine that is visible in the 5th, TO, shot, some form of aux-air door?

    in reply to: German Phantoms Burn Coal. RAF Lossiemouth 2/3 May 07 #2533233
    Phixer
    Participant

    Beaut pics mates!!
    Phantom11 is going to love them!
    My mission in life is to go to Europe before the Germans retire the Spook and see and hear this amazing beautiful planes in the flesh,cheers for posting those pics

    Hearing them had a somewhat different perspective when ones head is just a few feet below the after-burner prior to a cat’ shot. I once was on the top bunk in a mess on 2 deck of Ark with my bunk dead inline with the track at the head of the waist cat. I could reach up and touch the cat’ tracks exterior without any straining whatsoever.

    Buddys in the mess described how I would do a 380 degree roll without waking up each time there was a launch when I was in my pit.

    The most annoying noise though was the strop retriever going down to the front, collecting the strop and then trundling back. That or the sound of chain lashings being dragged around or paint chipping hammers at work.

    The sounds and smells of a working aircraft carrier are only faintly represented by the FAA Museum’s ‘Carrier Experience’, none of that smell of AVCAT being burned by the gallon or the feel of grit being blown into the face. Still worth a visit to those who have never experienced the real thing though.

    But I would go back and do it all again (perhaps a bit differently in places :diablo: ).

    More memories are of the F4Ks (FG1s to the pickers of nitts) doing A/B runs on the de-tuners, like banshees wailing through the night.

    Cannot honestly understand what Kemble nimbys are all about, obviously haven’t lived.

    Nice to see those pic’s, what the hell are they using for fuel though – City Diesel?:D

    in reply to: Which Digital Prof SLR To Buy ? #455593
    Phixer
    Participant

    I have a Sony Alpha 100 and very good it is proving to.

    Following up to that here are two pic’s taken at the weekend by others using my cameras as I was in the front cockpit.

    The close up was on a Dynax7D with a Minolta Reflex 500 f8 and the other on a Sony Alpha with Minolta 75-300mm zoom.

    Neither pic’s were taken by folk familiar with the controls (one not that familiar with cameras in general) I just set them up and described the focusing indications.

    in reply to: Which Digital Prof SLR To Buy ? #455614
    Phixer
    Participant

    Hi all have been folowing this thread for a while and am starting to look (save up) for a DSLR. Now I was thinking of going for the Canon EOS 400D, but then I saw the Sony A100 which is around the same price but you can get it with a 18-70 and a 75-300mm lenses.

    Does any one have some experiance of this or should I just aim for the Canon?

    I have a Sony Alpha 100 and very good it is proving to.

    Being a long time Minolta user, starting with SRT-101s (best available SLR in 1968 IMHO – excellent metering and high quality Rokkor lenses with a no fiddling bayonet mount) in the late 1960s and followed by the X-700, Dynax 7 and then going digital with Dynax 7D and having collected useful Minolta AF mount fitted glass the Alpha was a natural progression.

    My only reservations with this was that it did not have the dedicated exposure comp’, flash comp and frame shooting mode dials and no second thumbwheel for shutter speed adjust (almost essential if driving fully manual exposure) and thus requires a little mental adjusting after the Dynax 7 and 7D (although these are still very much in use). Having said that, and with my limited experience of Canon/Nikon many of their camera models are not as well served controllability wise as the Alpha, IMHO the fewer visits down obscure menus or button presses the better. I get a feeling I am going to be pounced on here.

    One other thing is the non-availability of a vertical grip. This latter is of little concern to the aviation photographer but is if you shoot lots of other stuff – my arthritic hands are assisted much by a vertical grip here. Also being able to pack two batteries at a time into a grip, as with the D7D is very useful.

    There are some good pieces of Minolta AF mount glass available second-hand at the moment. I have tried a Minolta Reflex (mirror) 500mm f8 with some success on the Alpha.

    IMO well worth a serious look.

    in reply to: SPIT aluminum #1314805
    Phixer
    Participant

    I’ve got bloody thousands of the “purple riverts” in my garage, must be close to 150lb of them, all sizes 🙂

    All packed in loverley sticky grease in brown paper packets no doubt? 🙂

    in reply to: SPIT aluminum #1315769
    Phixer
    Participant

    Avdels, by the way, come grouped with their own P/N and not with any kind of solid No.

    They are usually ‘snipped’ and then milled down to 0.001″ clearance to finish.
    As I am sure you’re aware 😉
    Flipflopman

    Indeed I was aware 🙂 and many a mess have I seen of that milling job.:(

    in reply to: SPIT aluminum #1316593
    Phixer
    Participant

    Hi Rivet freaks!

    Hey! I am no freak only a chap trained in aircraft metal working, and a whole lot more, who happens to have used these things, in anger so to speak.;)

    Quite common to find both the green mag-alloy and purple rivets alongside each other in bits of structure i.e wing ribs etc. Never quite figured this out, can but presume that Supermarines had boxes of mixed-variety rivets on the shop floor!Cheers, Chumpy.

    Hyduminium rivets were useful for repair, or other, work where salt bath, or other, heat treatment facilities were unavailable.

    THey came in standard solid varieties, snap-head or countersunk, or as an Avdel type (a fancy looking pop-type rivet but which left a portion of snapped off mandrel which required trimming down with a special, often pnuematic driven, rotary multi-edged cutter.:)

    in reply to: Bristol Brabazon #1316598
    Phixer
    Participant

    I am aware that this is a very sad question, but does anyone out there have any photographs of the Bristol Brabazon being broken up? It’s probably a long shot but I would be extremely interested to know, and to see photographs of the thing in it’s death throes would be very interesting indeed.

    Don’t know about that but if you are interested DD Home Entertainment have a Brabazon DVD available.

    in reply to: SPIT aluminum #1318475
    Phixer
    Participant

    Purple ones?

    :diablo:

    Flipflopman

    If my memory serves those would be hyduminium (note; not hyduminum 😀 ), mag’ alloy rivets would have been green coated.

    in reply to: ROYAL NAVY VIDEOS #2062567
    Phixer
    Participant

    That link was for the old RN website which was much better than the current design in my opinion. Here’s the link for the new multimedia centre http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/nav.3611

    Thanks for that and I agree that the old site was better laid out.

    Late with this ’cause I lose track of NEW Posts by being frequently logged out whilst browsing the forum. This happens nearly ever session, is there some kinda time-out if one has a page up and takes awhile composing a reply?

    Sorry If this is OT but I had started a thread on this increasingly irritating behaviour with as yet no replies.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 281 total)