dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2622198
    Indian1973
    Participant

    India has a secret force of F-16s too πŸ˜‰ – the RSAF F-16s are going to be a regular visitor to Kalaikunda.

    in reply to: F-16 Block 50/52 Vs Mirage 2000-5mk2 #2622309
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I think the comparison was between F-16 Block52 not the Block60.

    In A2A mode , the F-16 could fly without the CFTs I suppose which would give it a
    similar loiter time as the Mirage. Both can be supported by refuelers (for those nations than have refuelers). if it comes to a CFT equipped F-16 coming across a drop-tanked Mirage , the Mirage will drop its tanks and gain an advantage.

    AIM9X can be countered with Python5
    AIM120D can be countered by Meteor.

    as I said, the low wing loading of Mirage and superior top speed gives it advantages
    the higher and faster it goes. It can launch BVR aams at high energy and escape the
    countershots at top speed if its used wisely.

    how does the Block52’s radar & ECM stack up against the RDY2 and ICMSmk3 ?

    also whats the T:W ratio of a F-16 Block52 (no CFT) but full internal fuel and a M2K-9
    with full internal fuel ?

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2622399
    Indian1973
    Participant

    with Ukraine in the western fold, I am sure a few of their Flankers are already inside a shed at Lockheed being analyzed carefully. Mig29 they purchased a whole lot from Moldova.

    in reply to: F-16 Block 50/52 Vs Mirage 2000-5mk2 #2622417
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Mirages have the advantage the higher and faster the combat is due to delta wing and no big fixed CFTs. does the Block52 always have its CFT installed or it may be removed for A2A work ?

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News and Discussion #2055398
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I dont think VL Mica compares favourably with Shtil on any parameter. typically AAMs have a short burn time to reach max speed and then inertia while the bigger Shtil probably has more of a active burn time to chase down hard manouvering targets.
    VL Mica can at best compete with Barak. IN is reported to be interested in a Barak-2 with capability to defeat supersonic missiles.

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2622937
    Indian1973
    Participant

    clash of swords again πŸ™‚ Kalaikunda is a Mig27 base in west bengal now being upgraded with additonal housing etc. to host multi-national exercises.

    http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=290645

    Indo-US joint fighter exercise in November
    NEW DELHI, APR 6 (PTI)

    Indian Air Forces frontline Sukhoi, Mirage 2000 and upgraded Mig Bisons would cross swords with the United States Air Force F-16 fighting falcons in the second series of joint fighter exercises in November this year.

    The pilots of the two air forces would match their skills in close range as well as beyond visual range combats over Kalikunda airbase in West Bengal. In their first test of wits, the Indian pilots had got the better of their American counterparts in Gwalior last year.

    But the contest that time had been between the US F-15’s and the Indian SU-30’s and Bisons. And the US air force this time are bringing in their Fighting Falcons that too of Batch 50-52’s, the latest upgrades series.

    According to top IAF officials, 8 to 12 American F-16’s would be taking part in the exercise ‘Cope Thunder Three’ and India, besides the Su-30MKI and SU-30K, would field the Mig-27s, Mirage 2000 and Mig Bisons.

    The US officials have been very keen to have a closer look at India’s just acquired SU-30MKI. In the past, New Delhi has spurned invitations for the frontline fighters to visit America for taking part in multi-nation air exercises.

    in reply to: Pakistan inaugurates JF-17 factory #2623043
    Indian1973
    Participant

    is the air intake redesign going to help
    (a) RCS reduction
    (b) more/less air into the engine
    (c) some aerodynamic issue resolution ?

    in reply to: Israel wins AAM upgrade in India #2623422
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I think someone published all the details and photos after last years Defexpo in delhi.
    will try to locate….

    from BR:
    Note: The Indian Army has decided to upgrade it’s ZSU-23-4 air defence systems. Defence News reported that Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) were awarded a contract, worth US $104 million, to upgrade 48 Indian Army ZSU-23-4 air defence systems. The Chairman of BEL, Y Gopala Rao, stated that the trials are being conducted on two upgraded prototypes and the remaining 46 systems will be upgraded by 2005. IAI is expected to assist BEL with the system integration. Defence News reported that the upgraded systems will feature a solid-state radar and computers, electro-optical fire control systems, a new engine and overhauling of all subsystems. The upgraded systems must be able to operate despite enemy jamming, must be able to pick up targets more than 15 km away, and must function in temperatures between 35ΒΊ Celsius and minus 40ΒΊ Celsius. The gun must be able to shoot down targets flying up to 450 miles per hour up to 1500 meters and out to 2500 meters. The purpose of the upgrade would be to extend the life of the air defence system by 15 years.

    ps. the bofors L-70 and ZSU-23-2 are also being upgraded. some stuff like
    thernal imager and LRF could be sourced from Israel again.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/events/images/IB-BELGunUpgrades.jpg

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2623906
    Indian1973
    Participant

    India must respect Pakistans defence needs whatever they may be. Nobody can tell Pakistan what they should or should not buy with their own money.

    But the USA must stop giving out free arms to narco-terrorist regimes worldwide. Its much more destabilizing than commercial sales that people like Russia or France do, because prices put a natural brake on quantity. The US on the other hand walks around with a blank chequebook and a gigantic arsenal of arms both used and new that it uses as a stick to ‘contain’ future rivals and ‘balance’ regions.

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2625095
    Indian1973
    Participant

    seen on TV last night. one Mig21 FL(?) sqdn will be decommed this year. how many FL
    sqdns are in active service ? how many -U trainers still in service ?

    the Bison upg pgm will terminate middle of this year, they had reached around 90-100 done in Nov of 2004.

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2625578
    Indian1973
    Participant

    sealord, US has put sanctions on the civilian part of the indian nuclear industry (power generation) since mid-1970s which has severely hampered our efforts to evolve a viable nuclear power industry. They tried their best to scuttle the supply of 1000MW reactors from russia. They have also hidden sanctions in place against the space program since by definition anything can be dual-use if one is so inclined. a Ninja warrior can kill with a toothpick or a paper dart so they too can be termed weapons of mass destruction. Now the US is opposing strongly the Iran-India gas pipeline and wants india to sign up for turkmenistan pipeline instead.

    as to china it has supplied nukes and missiles to pak a nation that has repeatedly demonstrated a tendency to take huge risks in their ceaseless quest to ‘hurt’ india. Its a cheap and low-footprint way for causing trouble in india’s backyard. PRC will ‘fight’ India down to the last pakistani πŸ˜‰ they have already established 4 naval bases on Myanmar coast and are angling for another one in Gwader at mouth of persian gulf (though US seems to have nipped that in the bud).

    Sure they wont go into open war – too expensive, messy, could backfire badly…but the intent is to slow India’s progress up the ladder as much as feasible…so they can consolidate their own positions and grab free meat off the table.

    jmt.

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2625790
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Rip, Indias primary long and medium term strategic rival is PRC, and then the US. Pak is a sideshow of a puppet they both prop up to keep Indian minds ‘engaged’ and away from extra regional issues.

    however the tides have changed permanently and if you look at the division of the budget lately, the armys share is coming down the navy and AF are going up. India now has vital trade interests and sea lanes stretching to brazil and venezuela in the west and australia in the east…minerals, oil, agri produce, the stuff that keeps economies humming. arrangements will have to be made to protect all these linkages to the world economy.

    I am quite disappointed they are considering only light birds for MRCA. something like
    the SU34 armed with suitably advanced ground mapping and surveillance radar would
    be the best option to have more potent strike teeth wrt PRC. like the MKI, much of the avionics could be non-russian and the radar could perhaps be sourced from Israel.

    When the PRC Flanker threat is dealt with head-on, there will be more than enough
    combat power to *crush* anything smaller and a good base to start planning how to
    deal with future US adventures in the region…which will come as sure as night follows day.

    I dont see any signs yet that US is prepared to ‘accomodate’ India into various power broker bodies peacefully and without extracting heavy ‘concessions’, so the only mode of entry left is kicking the door down at some point.

    Power is never given for free, it is taken.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force (News/photos/discussions) #2625791
    Indian1973
    Participant

    it is pertinent to note before anyone goes off buying the farm that Pak doesnt have
    enough money to even run its formal education system, so they have just taken another $100 mil loan to improve matters in punjab province – always the hotbed of extremist madrassas and ‘teachers’

    http://www.hipakistan.com/en/detail.php?newsId=en77651&F_catID=&f_type=source

    πŸ˜€

    I guess the madrassas werent producing enough good F-16 pilots πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: BEST AND WORST MOVIE AVIATION SCENES #2635133
    Indian1973
    Participant

    a fun movie is “hot shots” which does a funny take on Top Gun. I like where
    they cook a sausage in the flames of the tailpipe. didnt they do one on Rambo
    also ?

    in reply to: PN News #2058110
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Press Trust of India: not very clear what exercises they were doing dockside, perhaps
    just transferring fuel.

    Six killed, 100 injured in fire aboard Pak navy’s oil tanker
    Mar 10, 2005 09:27:00 PM

    Islamabad, Mar 10 (PTI) Six people were killed and around 100 injured when a massive fire broke out aboard an oil tanker belonging to Pakistani navy in the southern port city of Karachi today.
    The fire on the oil tanker MB Morgan left six people dead and around hundred injured, the Navy spokesman said.

    He said the blaze in the tanker broke out after a gas leakage started during naval exercises, adding 55 of the injured had serious burns.

    The spokesperson said an inquiry has been ordered into the incident to determine the cause of the fire, adding preliminary reports suggest the fire was caused by accident and was not a sabotage.

    Earlier, the private Geo TV reported that some 35 injured were operated upon and several others were shifted to the Intensive Care Unit of the naval hospital where they had been admitted for treatment.

    Ambulances were rushed to the site and helicopters were also seen removing the injured, most of them sailors, to the naval hospital, the TV report said.

    The naval authorities blocked the road leading to the dockyard and journalists were not allowed to visit the area, it said.

    The spokesman said the situation was brought under control by naval authorities after a couple of hours. PTI

    Specs of the ship:
    DAWN

    PNS Moawin the Ex HMS Poolster Class from the Dutch Navy.

    Displacement
    16,800 tons full load

    Speed
    21 Kts

    Complement
    200 sailors and 15 Officers

    Cargo Capacity
    10,300 tons

    Guns
    Vulcan Phalanx CIWS

    Radars
    Navigational, Decca 2459, Decca 1229C

    Sonar
    CWE 10, Hull mounted, active search

    Helicopters
    Sea King

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 1,845 total)