nowadays F1 cars are nearly all composite except the engine. even the struts and load bearing rods in the suspension system. they showed a prog on TV about how Jordan pioneered the composite for F1 in 1982 and using a electronic weighing scale showed a
60% difference in a small L-shaped component between metal and composite.
Nothing. and its just one website where certain people participated. the sample sizes are
so small its laughable to draw conclusions about any country. infact I think its impossible to figure out what the is “average” level of a country in anything unless one covers all geographical areas and samples hundreds of thousands of people…just picking a few kids off a school in a city doesnt work.
small and rich countries like nordic states will always display a better average.
however their small population also restricts the amount of deployable quality people. and thats where large nations like US win the ‘war’
mebbe a vacuum cleaner used to sweep up any ground debris near the engine
intakes before the plane starts ? fire extinguisher ?
that gripen photo is digitally brightened to make it look good and those nice radar
displays arent the mode the LCA MFDs are in.
here’s a duller looking pic that may actually be that of a real gripen cockpit
http://www.canit.se/~griffon/aviation/img/saab/gripen/gall97/gripen-cockpit.jpg
imo LCA has done a good thing with the colour coded buttons. searching for the
right one among 20 black buttons in gripen under pressure doesnt look easy.
all the eurocanards have a a better HUD than LCA at present, but that can
be easily fixed if the IAF wants…sextant sells that wide-angle HUD.
PAF reminds me of a old-school AF – brave, courageous and good with the very limited
tools they have.
But they will fall like flies today if they go up against the much better equipped AFs which are very common all over asia. not a chance of WVR heroics prevailing – potential enemies have far superior planes, support tools, wvr and bvr weapons…and I am not even getting into PAFs lack of focus on helping the PA.
30-40 yrs ago PAF was technically good AF in asia because of generous US aid. stuff
like sidewinder missiles, sabrejet, ground based ADGES, Hawk SAM, F-16A were very
current weapons when supplied.
With a small economy Pak really cannot support a high quality AF of the
size it has presently. To increase quality, its probably necessary for them to
downsize to a 200 plane AF and get rid of the old stuff.
the Block60 has the aesa advantage, inbuilt navigation pod & irst, plus a newer cockpit
and ecm probably. its like comparing 2 a/c about a decade apart in tech level. the CFT
also gives it better range?
real comp should be with a block50-52…again the CFT frees up two inner pylons
for munitions.
does the F16-block50+ carry the AIM9X and HMCS these days ?
and whats the BVR matchup between RDY2 and APG-66-vlatest ?
suppose the data is encrypted using a 2048 bit long AES private key. Can current technology break it ? I was reading even breaking a 512 bit AES keyed message is not feasible right now.
information tapping in electrical form is much easier. there will be optical repeaters
at places below the ocean..every 100-200km…at the landing points they become electrical signals to be demultiplexed and sent to various directions after reconversion to optical. So if the idea to catch faxes to the chinese embassy, why not just simplify the problem by simply
tapping it in the washington telephone exchange or ISP data center rather than prowling around trying to tap a cable with terabits of data hundreds of meters below the ocean ?
and how do they collect the data – does the jimmy carter rig up another
undersea cable to a shore point, does it stay there for months just listening
or leave behind a “hard disk array and computer” for pickup later. signals
cannot be transmitted fast from deep in water as the elf/vlf bandwidth limits show.
two pix of two LGB on Jag. the seeker head looks different, one has little fins one has a
ring. which one is paveway2 and whats the other ?
this one has fins at the tip and the copper coloured part looks longer..overall
it looks longer.
http://www.protonriver.com/ae2005/batch4/img006.jpg
has a ring at tip and copper coloured part is shorter.
http://www.protonriver.com/ae2005/batch4/img004.jpg
Huge batch of new AI04 pix from PROTONRIVER.
http://www.protonriver.com/ae2005/batch4/
good sideview of MMR radar
http://www.protonriver.com/ae2005/batch3/Multi%20Mode%20Radar%20(LCA).Jā¦
š
cockpit of IJT#2
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/events/images/IJTCockpit.jpg
it looks like Unkil is also willing to co-opt japan into missile defence work to dampen the
threat from north korea. first international sales of PAC-3 to netherlands and japan. I
am sure JMSDF would like the TBMD version of SM2 on their Kongou ships as well…
http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/article_002101.shtml
I am a supporter of both South Korea and Japan going nuclear as it will take
the wind out of sails of north korea and ….. . Unkil is not a reliable protector
for long term, they have to look out for themselves in the end.
the ‘download’ link is slow but the pdf is worthwhile. pity it cannot be attached here.
and a much more powerful radar.
CAT – the second major product spinoff from LCA. Almost all the features mentioned
were first developed for the LCA, some were used in IJT which has done 125 test flights
and going well.
does the USN Hawkeyes have onboard air controllers ? one modification to reduce weight
could be offload all the controllers and their equipment into the ship and transmit the
radar imagery via satellite.
here are three photos posted by Shiv on BR about CAT, Akash and Brahmos. the 3D-CAR radar in the akash pic has been selected by navy for their new corvette program also…it is reported to detect small UAV at 200km during a desert deployment test.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/Temp/upload/ai05-catinfo1.jpg
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/Temp/upload/ai05-akashinfo.jpg
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/Temp/upload/ai05-brahmosinfo.jpg