not a big surprise. IAF came to same decision in early 1990s with same
two options. Mirage needs three external fuel tanks probably to match the
flanker in range yet still not in payload or manouver.
ofcourse operating costs are more. but u get what u pay for.
the TEL looks like one for Smerch.
is the canadian company radarsat subcontracted by raytheon to
supply the SAR module for this platform ?
tsk tsk Jonesy 🙂 its you “imperialists” trying to invade us, so that
means your SSNs need to come in close to support the invasion
fleet(s).
in the deep waters, convoys can be arranged to attract as bait
and better security.
no doubt our LRMP fleet is meager by japanese stds but its going
to grow and while japan faced potentially 50-60 ussr subs prowling around, we’d need to deal with barely 5-10 atmost 🙂
I am quite hopeful 🙂 though my scenario is obviously pure drug induced fiction !
other than the USN, none of the other western navies (even including their SSNs) are safe when operating within Flanker range of the india/china/russia shores.
The british & french carriers can be matched by shore based flanker, migs, aew so that advantage is neutralized. shore based LRMP a/c and ship based helos can make life rough for a SSN esp as torpedoes arent really long ranged weapons..
That leaves the surface ships to clean up, which as noted above
isnt very difficult…using stuff like subs armed with klubs.
The “West” looks strong onlee because of the vast USN presence. if due to a economic decline or political changes
the US CVN fleet were to drop down, the “West” will cease
to control the worlds oceans the way it does now. This will
signal the end of a particular phase in world history – expeditionary ops against powerful enemies far away.
Imo In around 2 decades, india & china will be strong enough
to beat back massed US CVN + SSN attacks even if the
US spending continues at its present super-high levels.
the ‘leading’ SSNs are said to have a ‘quiet speed’ of 20-25 knots.
and they can all dive plenty deep.
blazing sprints are seldom used methinks.
seems to have a Typhoon style divided air intake. did it reach
beyond wooden models ?
leaving aside the sundry details, I am referring to things on the
scale of this
http://www.flonnet.com/fl1811/18110990.htm
400 tanks, 75000 troops, 1,000 sorties deploying 120 aircraft, including 70 fighters. Two hundred pilots were critically evaluated during the exercises.Major-General I.A. Satur of 36 Armoured Division, who led the attacks on the “enemy”, told the media that his tanks, mechanised columns, heavy artillery and other force multipliers had moved 190 km in six days. In all 1,000 armoured vehicles participated in the assault.
Defence Journal has become a paid site now.
PAF_fan, indeed I am sleeping easy at night. However unless you can provide Pak media reports that the PA is undertaking atleast one-two big integrated exercises every year it would seem my ‘feelings’ have some substance. the success of Riposte also needs a great deal of support from the PAF, so I am interested to know of joint PAF-PA exercises also in the last few years.
I am aware that you are not an authority on the PAF, let alone the
PA. someone in the know wouldnt have needed Steve to tell them only 6-7 C-130 were operational from 20 delivered and would be well aware of the Bell helicopter issue he outlined.
My expectations have been suitably lowered.
could you educate us about these differences please?
PAF_fan, actually I am unable to find media reports of large exercises. I
note a couple of ‘leadership exercises’ in which top commanders huddle together in two teams and work the strategic aspects.
My feeling is that Riposte is now abandoned or kept on backburner due to lack of funding to match the indian buildup after 1999. Last 2-3 yrs
the Pak media / commentators / experts havent talked much or at all of riposte but more of going nuclear if even light losses in territory are faced.
lack of large protected sources of petroleum supply may also
have something to do with it.
CNN reports max speed 193mph possible and storm surge of > 3m.
I am wondering if the multi-million $$ mansions I saw on the boat tour
from The Pier are going to be damaged ? these lie just north of downtown Tampa along the shore and some have small earthern berms, most dont.
Please keep us updated and good luck Scooter.
is this PA orbat good for study ?
> The fact that as a ratio of APCs/IFVs/Choppers/Tanks to
>soldiers, the Pakistan Army is a more mobile and flexible force
you have been saying this for quite sometime now. Care to provide some numbers? I have already shown the ratio in choppers
available is the same if we discount paf attrition and better for
india if we take it into account. india has a very massive superiority in tactical airlift like AN32 . I feel I am talking past you on that.
> PLA
PLA your statement doesnt make sense. the cross country speed
of tanks is limited by their tracks and suspension to around 40-50kmph at most. and moreover the british and US armies with
65 ton tanks are a lot more mobile than india/pak/russian armies
who field lighter tanks. all their tanks have inferior TWR than
indian/pak tanks and they managed the iraq invasions
astonishing rate of advance just fine.
> riposte
yes I know of that. but multi-div combined arms exercises to
practise the strategy you laid out on the field seems to have been
lacking of late. I would be grateful if you could locate a list of
the PA exercises in last 5 years and what kind of units were involved. I am going to get together a list for IA by asking around.
btw what is a reliable source to study the PA Orbat composition?
anyone have a photo to share of the cancelled Mikoyan Mig33 light fighter project (the F16ski) ?