dark light

Chris G

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 314 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hollywood to film BoB story?!! #1795684
    Chris G
    Participant

    just to remind you of the benefits of such films:

    http://website.lineone.net/~airgage/movies/tues.rm

    sorry their is no sound it was created at a time when download times mattered…..

    in reply to: Hawker Hunter 'blue note'. What is it? #1795931
    Chris G
    Participant

    video-sound clip

    I have now found where I had originally stored a clip of the meteor doing it:

    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/chris.gage/meatbox.rm

    Chris

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Film – Analysis #1797221
    Chris G
    Participant

    To grab a still from DVD, use Power DVD in it’s latest form and their is a grab still frame function. I am sure other players have a similar function.

    If you want to get really techy you can convert the DVD footage back to an avi and look at the frames in a conventional video editing package. There are freeware programs to do this….actually you could then re-edit the whole film, rerender as a dvd and…..

    in reply to: How to colour a black and white photo #1797490
    Chris G
    Participant

    Mark, I hope you are happy to do the same with video at 25 fps………

    in reply to: Hawker Hunter 'blue note'. What is it? #1799937
    Chris G
    Participant

    I used to know exactly why it sounds as it does, after the required intake of red wine on a friday night the memory is dulled but I think it is to do with air intakes rather than gun ports….I did have some info from someone who “knows about these things”.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Film – Analysis #1799972
    Chris G
    Participant

    I think a big thank you is due to Tim for sharing his memory, log book and experience with us.

    Regrds and thank you

    Chris

    in reply to: Hawker Hunter 'blue note'. What is it? #1799973
    Chris G
    Participant

    Sounds better coming off a meteor , I have the sound on tape to prove it as well!

    in reply to: Duford Museum back in 1977 #1805066
    Chris G
    Participant

    If you drift back here: http://forum.airforces.info/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19428&perpage=30&highlight=airgage&pagenumber=4

    you will find pics of b24/cf100, sea fury etc….

    in reply to: Duford Museum back in 1977 #1805458
    Chris G
    Participant

    I have a report from the telegragh re: the He111 remains which were lifted from a Nowegian Lake. B24 was never intended for the UK except in peoples imaginations, it was transitting when it required engine work after making an initial landing at Mildenhall.

    Possibly the B24 was a significant stage in the change of DX from a static aircraft site to what it is today…….

    in reply to: Duford Museum back in 1977 #1805921
    Chris G
    Participant

    If you do a search for a thread entitled a few old pictures or similar you will find a number of pictures posted from the ’70s including the Sea Fury/B24/etc. as referred to, somewhere I have a picture of the Rothmans line up

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Film – Analysis #1806441
    Chris G
    Participant

    Think you’ll you’ll find that camera and mirror was installed in front seat.

    Most of the actual parchute drops using people that were required on the DX set were done from the “He111” a/c, the polish airman for instance then landed to the rear of the airfield at Barkers farm, you can see the corner of the rear of the chateau mockup to the right of the screen in the landing shot.

    I was 9 at the time and watched this from my bedroom window (in Duxford)!!

    Memories

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Film – Analysis #1806844
    Chris G
    Participant

    Think you will find that the two seater generally had a camera and “mirror arrangement” in the spare. The practicalities of ejecting a parachute from the second seat are pretty complex if you think about it.

    in reply to: Black out at RAF Museum? #1810802
    Chris G
    Participant

    I realise the photographers here won’t like it but here is a thought. Please read all the post and salient points before firing off!

    Perhaps darkness/low lighting is an attempt at atmosphere.

    It is difficult to show an aeroplane in a sterile museum hangar with any impact, hence why Old Warden/DX T2 hangars and DX restoration areas work.

    If you have machines designed to kill people, camauflaged and often operated at night then jusy maybe it is imaginitive to put them in a darker area so that younger generations can use their imagination.

    I haven’t been to Hendon recently so this is a supposition based on the comments here.

    We should remember that a museum is not a location to use as a photgraphic excercise but to display artefacts. All these aircraft are well documentedin photographic form. I know it is nice to take a self-generatetd pictorial souvenir home (I have plenty myself). Ask yourself why are the aircraft in that situation and displayed?

    This is a point of view , not a defence of Hendon, maybe it provokes thought on aircraft displays……..

    Finally you can bet the lighting policy will be the result of a committe decision and any change would all be as aresult of a committee decision, hence the lack of response from the museum ?

    in reply to: A New Interest #1811103
    Chris G
    Participant

    How long before we spy it over East Suffolk then?

    I quite liked playing spot the p.51 on Sunday afternoons.

    There are some other Stearmans down here that might like to play as well.

    in reply to: Avenger Plonky #1816642
    Chris G
    Participant

    Dave thanks for the pics, really appreciated, sort of thread we ought to have more often here.

    Chris

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 314 total)