Mi-28NM testing, looks like it got those updated wing pods:
…
And some good footage of it flying around.
Is this the modernized version with higher top speed?
:apologetic:
We can discuss in a far more constructive way, come on lets not start mudslinging.
Both of you guys have different opinions on this but interesting nonetheless. whether right or wrong.
Just a thought. For two guys who have a lot of passion for the subject matter.
it shows that both are compromised with regards to ‘stealth’
a true LO is a pancake
Fixed.
How does such an active cancellation works for fast modulated signals lets say in the >1GHz frequency with pseudo random modulation? I would supposed only the the original emitter would be privy to the modulating pattern. Is it broad band jamming of a new kind?
MTOW 240 t.
Twin-engine variants is interesting, but unlikely. 2 NK-32+ (2 * 15,000 kg) : 0.25 kg = 120000 kg
Ok, I visited your website for the PAK DA and checked out your perspective of the PAK DA. :eagerness:
Interesting, lets see how it turns out.
Thanks
Not really to have 4 in it. In general, for a bomber like that scale, T/W= ~0.25-0.3. 4* 15 t=60t, then the MTOW will be more than 200T.
As per some saying, the MTOW could be 100~150T, then 2 engines based on NK-32M core with more thrust by a bigger BPR. would do.
Thats similar MTOW of Tu-22M, right?
Whats the latest status of the Izd 30 and the PD14. Would the vanilla PD14 also equip military transport or some militarized version will be produced.
Are Klimov and Kutznetsov working on their own engine as well?
Are there other engine programmes to equip the PAKDA?
Any pics of that open side bay?
That is an awesome pic. And Tu 160s carries twelve of these?
Counts as 1 Launcher 🙂
Hehe, it is alright, dont worry. 😛 I am a bit sharky, but i just thought it would be very obvious to most, it apparently isnt tho.
For me too I thought it was new, it is not very apparent especially to people not visiting regularly.
For the short ranges needed to operate combat aircrafts in Syria, wont it be suitable to use long range artillery/MRLS etc instead with support from target acquisition from drones etc? Should be much cheaper. Like say bombing some IS positions in the vicinity of the Airbase etc…
Nice to see Flateric posting something again.
I hope we hear something new soon, it has been a while. Something real. Not the usual tripe from the resident stronkians 🙂
Anything new from here?
Since the Ukraine Crisis, no solid info anymore about the PAK FA. Is it flying regularly?
Never wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.