dark light

WinterStars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 349 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Space and Missiles thread #5 #1792880
    WinterStars
    Participant
    in reply to: Russo-Taiwanese jet fighter #2305582
    WinterStars
    Participant

    alleged Russian design in order to obtain expert assistance sent to Russia for at AIDC, have been specially prepared fifty thousand U.S. dollars in cash to buy advanced whiskey and vodka as a gift, but Russian experts, โ€œvery enthusiasticโ€ , a considerable investment guidance and help, and no intention to charge an additional precious gift.

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2305592
    WinterStars
    Participant

    It should be Chepkin’s mentioned type-30 engine or a modification of the current engines with “type-30” engine components untill its development ends! According the picture at least engine development going on its way :rolleyes:

    At least something is going on. Funny, coz it looks as if the engine was charred. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2305932
    WinterStars
    Participant

    You can do LPI any time of the year, no big deal with mixed signal designs ๐Ÿ˜€
    Question is, Will Fujitsu sell these things to Russia? Or is Russia already developing some of their own? The next round of radars should be interesting to see. AD, Fairchild, etc also have GaN tech from what I read.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2305937
    WinterStars
    Participant

    IIRC, 2nd generation AESA radar would use either Gallium Nitride or Silicon Carbide technology. The former because it can handle high voltage (to generate more power), and the latter operate at higher temperature. Either method can be use to generate stronger radar beams.

    GaN is quite proven among the promising semiconductor materials.

    http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2010/20101004-01.html
    Check out the data from Fujitsu, they did a lot of initial work on HEMT.

    The dies are not like typical microprocessor dies. These are clunky dies with low transistor density. Check out the ganging of two transistors for driving up power output :diablo:. That is over simplistic but much better ganging designs are known. Power to the radiating element is only limited by cooling.

    http://www.fujitsu.com/img/PR/2010/20101004-01el.jpg
    ยฉ Fujitsu.

    The new amplifier will offer transmission output equivalent to approximately 16 times that of existing amplifiers that use gallium-arsenide (GaAs), thereby enabling W-band transmission ranges to be extended by approximately six times.

    Although the 16x gain will be limited by attenuation and the inverse square law, the gain in range is impressive. 4x compared to current material GaAs.

    http://www.fujitsu.com/global/news/pr/archives/month/2011/20110606-02.html
    For X band the situation won’t be different, power output of 20 W is easy with good cooling.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306164
    WinterStars
    Participant

    give me a ring when Typhoon finally gets DSI air intakes ๐Ÿ˜€

    Would be interesting to see DSI intakes on a typhoon in vertical climb, a pair of half concealed bumps … ๐Ÿ˜€

    JF 17 might start shooting his (pay)load too soon.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306223
    WinterStars
    Participant

    China is a socialist country. Things don’t cost anything in China. ๐Ÿ˜€

    a la 1984 :p

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306226
    WinterStars
    Participant

    what does a Rolls Royce have to do with planes? :confused

    Ooops ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306233
    WinterStars
    Participant

    Typhoon’s technology is at best a match for that of Thunder Block 2 ๐Ÿ˜€

    Don’t forget it is free as well vs the โ‚ฌ100m Typhoon.

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2306270
    WinterStars
    Participant

    RIVET-JOINTski, most likely – to date there were only one or two pictures of its forward fuselage while under construction, but this is the first time it has been seen either in the air or in its entirety, so you’re in good company ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Which airframe is this, Tu 204?

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306274
    WinterStars
    Participant

    Yet still are “free”.

    I’ll stick with the much better Typhoon thank you very much.

    Noo.. Please take. We will also give you money to train your pilots and buy you fuel. Please accept our kind gesture.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2306513
    WinterStars
    Participant

    Even Ajay’s beloved F-35 won’t have a “World beating 360 degree AESA “:eek:
    …but let me point HAL (and Tikhomirov-NIIP) in the right direction (c/o DARPA):

    http://phys.org/news/2012-04-silicon-wafer-scale-ghz-phased-array.html
    http://phys.org/news165768262.html

    The only exceptional thing there is noise and interference elimination of having all components on chip and the reduced dimension, probably for space constrained applications. HFET/HEMT are known to scale well uptil 600 GHz in power and current gain, so there is so much headroom available and no need to get all BiCMOS with it complicated fabrication process.

    Since MMICs in general are mostly LSI, for maximum power output you are better off designing a big ugly die with maximum area for heat dissipation, robust signal paths and with maximum power that you can extract from your transistor design. The modulating signal can be synthesized elsewhere. High power HEMT transistor designs are commercially available for WiMAX base devices. So if you know what you want you can even order samples from Hitachi or Fairchild, AD etc… although in this case you will need a soldering iron. In case you need it for your radar :diablo:, you might have to tailor the frequency response of your design… HFETs can be ganged just like BJTs can be Darlington Paired to drive up the power output.

    I still have 2 DACs from AD which provided me with some samples years ago, I never used them cause they are gold plated!!

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306664
    WinterStars
    Participant

    By the time this thread finishes JSLLL4 would have had 10 accounts. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    — hides —

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2307232
    WinterStars
    Participant

    Meh, what new aircraft is the US procuring till 2020 in the THOUSANDS?

    The F-35 will be lucky to hit that by 2040 given tepid rate at which the US economy is moving along.

    We were talking about numbers in the inventory, so I think yeah 1000s, even USN has 1000+ ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    So then what is the VVS inventory like as … snip

    in reply to: Russian Space and Missiles thread #5 #1792935
    WinterStars
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 349 total)