About time the Angara family show itself.
Soyuz and Proton have had a long career. Their combined launch history is and will remain untouchable. Between them in excess of 2000 launches with a success rate > 96%. The Legacy of Soviet simplicity, ruggedness and reliability.
Angara should help ease on those payments to Kazakhstan and those obscene shipping fees. Plesetsk is ideal for Russia but Vostochny is quite far on the other side of the continent.
If someone has Angara news please share.
China shall be the world #1 because it has better freedom than most other countries and free speech and thought are protected by law in that country ๐
:diablo:
Indeed, Right on the money.:D
That Z-11 looks awfull familiar to something….
:D:D:D
It has the whiskers of the JF 17, :dev2:
Wouldn’t drive a Russian car either.
Or an American ๐ .
The F22s of the road are designed in Wolfsburg or on authorization from Wolfsburg. Why go for 4.5++ Gen.
Bitte schรถn:D
I propose a North Star AWAC-type sensor design, consisting of 8 sensors mounted in the shape of a 4-pointed star. Each point is triangular and has 2 straight outer sides, with the left outer side being an AESA and the right outer side being an IRST. Since RAM works by absorbing radar waves and convert them into heat, once RAM is shone with AESA they would turn hot making them easy to spot with large long-range IRST.
Proposal accepted if it has DSI.
well at least we know now you’re not Chinese. Every Chinese knows Manchus and Mongols not the same.
But he is Chinese, Like one of those Asians who likes to think he is black.:diablo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjDqiIBgEcQ
Reduction in dimension of Bulava is a function of generational leap in electronics , materials ,propulsion system so on and so forth ……for eg Bulava is a all composite missile and benefits greatly in fuel mass fraction when compared to using metals.
Throw up weight is the function of New warhead design and accuracy of missile ….if you can design a new warhead which is lighter and gives you same or more bang with smaller dimension then you dont need a large throw up weight. With higher accuracy you need lower yeald to do the same job.
Reportedly the RS-24 and Bulava carries the same type of warhead but other details on warhead yeald to weight ratio are classified we can just guess
Indeed, that is what should have happened, a decrease in mass and dimension. It did, but the same throw weight of the R29 later variants could not be kept. As a result of which the RSM 56 with its 1.2 mt throw weight would be limited to a max of 5 – 6 100 kg warheads (not really a city buster) including bus and pen aids, warhead shielding etc. Throw weight should be irrespective of warhead yield and size, because you can always down load the missile and add more pen aids making START happy at the same time have better chance of penetrating terminal defenses. The sub is bigger and the missile is smaller and the crew is smaller but the number of tubes is less:confused::confused:
The Ohio has 50% more tubes, with bigger missiles, with lesser displacement and 40% more crew.
The next “Big” ICBM won’t be R36 sized, more of a UR-100 replacement.
Still, plenty big enough.
Most likely because the US filled the R36 silos with concrete ๐
One thing I don’t understand is why are the Russians trying to reduce the dimension of the RSM 56, when the Boreis are much bigger than the Delta IVs. In fact it is much bigger than the Ohios as well. Reduced dimension came at a lesser throw weight. The Ohios have 24 tubes with a bigger missile and lesser displacement.
Is it because of the double hull design of the Boreis. What I understood is that the missile tubes are outside the pressure hulls.
Can someone in the know please comment…
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4421/32259118.52/0_af5b3_46f96963_orig.jโฆ
Beast.
This has to be the best Road Mobile ICBM in existence. Good off road Mobility, Good CEP, although the cost of Mobility is less throw weight.
Had the same Iskander thought.
Then again, you can’t get too creative when it comes to general missile shape.
Indeed, but what about Austin Power’s Rocket with two side boosters that are permanently strapped?:diablo:
Infographics (RIA Novosti)
RSM-54 Sineva submarine-launched ballistic missile
Topol-M ballistic missileGood footages of Soviet and Russian ballistic missile launches including rail-based launch. (RIA Novosti)
http://en.rian.ru/video/20111219/170368259.html
I think they stopped making RSM 54, and now transitioning to R29RMU2? Liner for the Delta IV and RSM 56 for the Boreis.
Also the Topol and Topol M are no longer manufactured. RS 24 entered service.
What is interesting is the supposed quasi ballistic trajectory of the RSM 56. How much of that is true is unknown. CEP should be improved though but with a throw weight of only 1.2 mt it is no replacement for the R29 variants.
Then there are talks about the super missile to replace the the formidable R36M2 Voevoda
Zelin is no longer the commander.
FYI, raptor’s time zone has always been different. GMT -3600 ๐ฎ
Yo grab your chips and beer folks!
BAe Test pilot John Farley flying and view on the Mig-29UB.
I found these pdf files on Flight Archive:
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%203116.html
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%203117.html
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%203118.html
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%203119.html
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%203120.html
Now is this readup awsome or awsome!?:D
Interesting bit about the flexible boundaries for the MiG 29 g limits. It would be interesting to know also about a similar test flight by the same pilot but for an FBW Su 27.
The pilot seems to have a favorable view of the Aircraft’s ruggedness and simplicity.
TsAGI is a top dog in aerodynamics ๐
certainly not prithvi… Something like the Indian equivalent of the BM 30.
Edit
Looks like the board says prahaar, which is a tactical Ballistic missile with active guidance not like dumb rockets from the Smerch.