Even ‘murica can’t touch Syria. China is over 1,000 times the power of Syria. War with China is impossible.
Syria has friends. And Syria invaded nobody.
More like Vietnam, Japan, Taiwan, Phillipines, with US and and its groupies while India and Russia make some noise but do nothing. China has no real ally … oh wait Pakistan.
India is ruled by the Aryan elite from Iran, and Iran is an ally of China. India therefore would ally with China.
:highly_amused:
Russia and India … I would expect both to provide material assistance to China in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
:very_drunk:
Until a local ARM becomes available (not impossible, see Mectron’s example)]
Didn’t Mectron just sold some ARMs for JF17?
I think they will get it no matter what, they might have to pay ….. more.
Probably subsidized, so it would mean some would be bought and some will be free :very_drunk:
Chinese pilots are much more potent than Arab pilots. :eagerness:
really … Arab pilots are Impotent
:stupid:
Exactly, which is why they bought more Su30MKI with lots of Israeli/French content.
I think your pic itself in the side view shows 0° AoA
What is the purpose of that piece of metal sticking to the sides of the intakes on the inside next to the weapon bays.
Thanks a lot, Now I remember Berkut/Twinblade post few pages ago. Didn’t strike me yet, Now I can correlate the names to the pics.
Now I am scratching my head, where would the fifth radar aperture be located, at least from lots of comments floating around in many forums, I understood five are planned.
1x Main Array, 2x Cheek Side Arrays, Rear sting array. Where is the fifth one?
What will become of the drag chute if the radar array goes in the rear sting, is the aerodynamic braking using all control surfaces (which I could see what it is doing from the video of the 52 on touchdown) sufficient not to warrant a drag chute?
They need to RAM IT DOWN. 😀
Great pics, Jo, mack8, Rii
The geometry of the inlet seems very incomprehensible to me. One angle it seems yeah it is like this, then from another angle no it cant be ..:confused:
Of course judging only by external appearances. Not privy to anything insider stuff.
Seems to me the EO aperture at the back and below the fuselage in these two pics
http://fotkidepo.ru/photo/401381/50624xkocpLedht/ygHbG8sHXQ/924441.jpg
http://fotkidepo.ru/photo/401381/50624xkocpLedht/ygHbG8sHXQ/924442.jpg
is this one
[ATTACH=CONFIG]220464[/ATTACH]
How many apertures are planned ??? In some airframes I see one behind the canopy, in some not.
Scroll to the end, great pics of the various EO stuffs
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/t-50_maks-2013/