dark light

Mpacha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 756 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hercules XV208 #1429331
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Rumours abound!

    “Today Ex WX Research C-130 XV-208 was delivered to Marshall’s
    Cambridge to become the Engine Test bed for the A-400M when they have
    fitted and Engine(s) to it “

    (From another source)

    in reply to: VC-10s visit Coltishall #1341651
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Thanks Dan,

    I did wonder when I saw the first one fly over Norwich. Nice day for it! 😀 (For a bloody change!)

    in reply to: Airbus A380 First Flight Announcement #690321
    Mpacha
    Participant

    In the meantime here is a picture of the first engine runs…….

    in reply to: Airbus A380 First Flight Announcement #733491
    Mpacha
    Participant

    In the meantime here is a picture of the first engine runs…….

    in reply to: Hunter Thread #2614959
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Interesting photo of the Hunter changed up to look like a MiG or Sukhoi.

    In any case does anyone have good photos of Hunters fitted with AIM-9 Sidewinders?

    What all nations used the Hunter with the AIM-9? Were they always fitted on the special inboard pylons that weren’t standard on the Hunter?

    Rhodesia had them fitted on the standard outboard pylon.

    in reply to: South Africa buys A400M #2615600
    Mpacha
    Participant

    “5 April 2005: SAAF Chief appears to pour cold water on military Airbus plans
    New SA Air Force chief Lieutenant-General Carlo Gagiano has seemingly poured cold water on South Africa’s plans to purchase Airbus Military’s A400M. Meeting the press during a visit by US Third Air Force commander Major-General Michael Gould, Gagiano said it was too early to comment on whether a new Airbus aircraft would replace the current C-130 fleet. He
    said C-130s were less costly to operate and he would be reluctant to fly the A400M where there were rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) or other hostile surface to air weapons. Gagiano, a Mirage fighter pilot with combat experience over Angola, added that no contact had been signed to purchase up to eight of the aicraft, merely an agreement to exercise that option in exchange for taking part in the aircraft’s manufacturing programme. He thought the aircraft could be better used for long-
    distance, strategic, airlift — and as a replacement for the SAAF’s antique Boeing 707 fleet.

    Gagiano, in passing, also confirmed DSD reports that only one B707 and two C130s were still operating. As was also reported, both are former US airframes. Indications are they will remain grounded for at least the rest of the year. There is no guarentee they will ever fly again. A Lockheed Martin specialist was only due to inspect the aircraft’s wing roots in six to eight month’s time, and after that there would be a further elapse of time before replacement parts would arriva and repairs could begin.

    Gould said he was visiting South Africa to learn more about the SA Air Force’s (SAAF) operations. He also pointed out to local media that cracked wingspars were not a problem peculiar to the SAAF fleet, but also affected his service and other operators. The US recently grounded 30 of their fleet and restricted the use of 60 more. he two air chiefs also discussed ways both air forces could support the African Union and the Southern African Development Community. This could include making US
    C130s available to South Africa until the C130s were again operational –or replaced. This would likely happen under the state partnership agreement between South Africa and the US state of New York. Gould spoke to the media while touring Waterkloof AFB at Pretoria. He was also scheduled to visit the Overberg, Langebaan and Ysterplaat Air Force bases. Langebaan, north of Cape Town, was constructed by the US in the late 1950s. South Africa deployed a SAAF fighter squadron to Korea where
    it served with distinction under US command during the 1950-1953 war.

    defence THINK!”

    in reply to: Hezbollah Drones over Israel #2616168
    Mpacha
    Participant

    These kits are too small to be able to carry good cameras. Besides, the really important bases Israel has are largely underground.
    Take a common motored flying model with a good radio set, attach to it a video camera, and here you got a Mirsad-1 type “UAV”.

    This may be so but I hardly think that the Israeli bases are the objective. More likely looking for crossing points and targets of opportunity. It may be crude, but definitely a worrying factor.

    in reply to: Hezbollah Drones over Israel #2616172
    Mpacha
    Participant

    A PAF F-16 shot down an indian UAV in 2002 with an AIM-9l

    Nothing new there. In 1983 a IAI Scout operated by South Africa was shot down by SAM-3’s in Mozambique and in 1987 two more were shot down in Angola by SAM-8’s. However as Erez says it ain’t easy, nor is it cost effective. One drone had 16 SA-8’s fired at it!

    Mpacha
    Participant

    Interesting topic, but one I feel that will have no conclusion. I’ve done a fair amount of research and even with the best of intentions not all claims can be resolved even when camera footage is shown. This footage doesn’t show the final result and sometimes aircraft survive some spectacular hits. You also have the human factor. People swear by what they saw, but it may not be what others saw. At the time of war you have the propaganda machine which will favour a “kill” even if doubts exist. Some forces may suffer heavier losses but this doesn’t neccessary make them the losers if they are better able to absorb these losses.

    Obviously in some cases it can be proven and in others the claims are clearly propaganda but there is a vast grey area in most cases. Just my opinion based on my experience but then again I think much of it is down to opinion.

    in reply to: Loaded-up C-130 #1370878
    Mpacha
    Participant

    I don’t remember the facts but I also thought the record was held by the Israeli’s flying out Ethiopian(?) refugees? Could be wrong, but there was some record made during this event……..

    in reply to: RAF Andover replacement #1388097
    Mpacha
    Participant

    A number of Andovers still operate in Africa. Can be seen in the Congo and in South Africa. Usually appear in South Africa for maintenance, since a number of HS748’s are maintained in South Africa. Ex-RAF machines but would not be surprised if some came from New Zealand.

    in reply to: CIA airvehicles #2635602
    Mpacha
    Participant

    This example served with the US Navy before joining the Congo AF under the auspices of the CIA. The CIA also made use of Air Zaire, Seagreen(or related aircraft), Herc Airlift Corp, Southern Air and very possibly even SAFAIR!?

    in reply to: CIA airvehicles #2640845
    Mpacha
    Participant

    From Newsweek

    OK you guys are all knicked! :diablo:

    “No Secrets: Eyes on the CIANewsweekMarch 7 issue – Aviation obsessives with cameras and Internet connections have become a threat to cover stories established by the CIA to mask its undercover operations and personnel overseas. U.S. intel sources complain that “plane spotters”—hobbyists who photograph airplanes landing or departing local airports and post the pix on the Internet—made it possible for CIA critics recently to assemble details of a clandestine transport system the agency set up to secretly move cargo and people—including terrorist suspects—around the world.

    Google searches revealed that plane spotters Web-posted numerous photos of two private aircraft—one a small Gulfstream jet and the other a midsize Boeing 737—registered to obscure companies suspected of CIA connections. Some of the pictures were taken at airports in foreign countries where CIA activities could be controversial. When the 737 last year went through a change of tail number and ownership—a suspicious company in suburban Boston apparently transferred the plane to a similar company in Reno, Nev.—Internet searches of aviation and public-record databases disclosed details of the plane’s new owners and registration number. One critical database, accessible via Google, was a central aircraft registry maintained by the government’s own Federal Aviation Administration. A U.S. intel source acknowledged that the instant availability of such data and photos on the Internet is not helpful “if your object is clandestinity.” (To see how it works, check the Web for info on a business jet carrying the Liechtenstein tail number HB-IES. The search should turn up pictures of that plane at a European airport, as well as public records and news stories describing how the plane, registered to a company called Aviatrans, once belonged to Saddam”

    in reply to: BAE Hawk MK100 users #2645871
    Mpacha
    Participant

    South Africa

    Photo: British Aerospace
    Photographer: Frans Dely

    in reply to: Dakotas! #1354082
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Some more…

    One Brit example and the rest from SA.

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 756 total)