dark light

Mpacha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 756 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2661658
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Mpacha are you saying XV193 was the Herk that was lost in Iraq?
    XV193 was lost on the 27th May 1993.

    -Dazza

    Oops……..well spotted that man! 😉 I should have said XV179, it helps if one actually reads the article :confused: Too many 4am starts this week……

    Blush, blush……… 😮 😮

    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2662151
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Arthur it was a K.

    TJ

    XV193 🙁

    in reply to: Trial flying lesson photos (31/01/05) #432563
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Ref the queezy feeling, it could also have been if you took numerous photo’s out the side window looking down. Keep your eye on the horizon! 😀

    Welcome to aviation :p

    in reply to: Has anyone been to Wattisham recently.. #1386689
    Mpacha
    Participant

    The Scout is behind the main gate,its a Skeeter thats where the museum is.

    Elmo you are incorrect! The Skeeter is outside HQ and the museum is on the other side of the building. This places it closer to the Scout at the main gate 😀 However, neither of them belong to the museum!? I’m not sure of the current location of the museum Scout, as when last there they still needed permission from the Army to place it outside the museum.

    in reply to: Has anyone been to Wattisham recently.. #1387634
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Members of the public can get to the museum, but the only aircraft they have is a Scout. Still they have a very interesting exibit crammed in a small space. I have to get ready for work, so I’ve not really studied this thread but if you give me details of what you are after, I still have access to Wattisham.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2613835
    Mpacha
    Participant

    [HTML]the first to have it in service. (ie. not testing but standard issue!) [/HTML]

    That what I’m saying. The HMD was installed on some 400 F 4s.Now, that means opertationally!

    This is why I mentioned that the xaim 95 “Agile”was the first experimental TVC missile, and no one deny that the Russain R 73 was the first operational TVC missle…

    Interesting, certainly a good myth then. A large number of publications have given credit to SA. May be at some point somebody said that the SAAF was the first “Air Force” to have it and the myth grew from there? Annoying thing is that I know someone who flew US Navy F 4s in 1968, if only he had done so a year later!?

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2613848
    Mpacha
    Participant

    I don’t deny that SA could have fielded a MHS. But if it did ,it was in md 70′, while the US Navy had it on its F 4s in 1969. I was talking about the first HMS…

    Another myth: the Su 35 is the first plane with a rear-facing radar…

    I don’t think anyone is denying that the US was the first to have the system, but they are saying that SA was the first to have it in service. (ie. not testing but standard issue!) I personally don’t know, but that is what some are saying……..

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2613883
    Mpacha
    Participant

    [PHP]The first helmet mounted sight was ready by the mid 70’s , and although relatively limited in comparison to later refinements and developments , was the first system in use[/PHP]

    The first in South Africa, not in the world…

    I’m not about to get involved in another childish flammer, because quite frankly I don’t care. However, there are a number of publications that give South Africa credit for being the first to use it operationally. I doubt if anyone can actually prove for or against this, but the fact remains that these reports exist!

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2614331
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Didn’t say it is impossible, just don’t know. Anyway,if there would be a source of inspiration, US is more plausible, if we consider the extent of KGB industrial espionage there, compared with SA, that hadn’t any relation (diplomatic) with the Soviet Uniuon

    Now here in lies the rub, it was the CIA who found out about Gerhard and I suspect the SA system also “borrowed” technology from the USA. However, it was still easier to aquire this from SA for the Russians. They had a very senior officer spying for them and a naval base in neighbouring Mozambique!

    Just a little “Google” found this:

    “Canadian Defence Procurement – December 2003

    The CF18 Incremental Modernization Program – In Detail

    Allan Ng reviews DND’s CF18 fighter aircraft modernization plan (Part 7)

    Follow-Ons to the ECP 583 – Joint Helmet-Mounted Cuing System (JHMCS)

    If Looks Could Kill – a New JHMCS Helmet for the CF?
    The Joint Helmet Mounted Cuing System – JHMCS – is a joint venture between Rockwell Collins and Israel’s Elbit Systems.[1] This JHMCS is intended for close-range air- to-air combat and is designed to take full advantage of the new, highly-manoeuverable, short range air-to-air missiles (AAM) now entering service with western air forces. The current CF short-range AAM (the infrared-guided AIM-9 Sidewinder) relies upon gaining an infrared ‘lock’ (albeit, with a back-up optical target detector) on an opponent. A tactical disadvantage of the close-range Sidewinders is the limited (30°) field-of- view of their infrared seeker-heads. JHMCS is meant to address this limitation.

    The next-generation short-range AAMs have much wider fields-of-view but this new type of missile can also be ‘slaved’ to a helmet-mounted sighting system like JHMCS. Instead of a Sidewinder’s 30° cone fanning out from the missile’s nose for ‘lock- on’, the next-generation of AAM’s fields-of- view will be at least 90°s. By simply looking at a target, a pilot wearing the JHMCS will be able to direct these new short-range AAMs.

    JHMCS is designed for 24 hour operation. A daylight visor (essentially a helmet-mounted heads-up display – top) is standard but, for nocturnal operations, an adaptor allows NVG (night-vision goggles – above, left) to be worn instead. Initial operational use of this system by the US is imminent. If CF Air Command acquires the JHMCS and a new short range AAM (as DND has planned) the upgraded CF18 will be well able to deal with more modern opponents in close air-to-air combat for years to come.

    ——————————————————————————–
    [1] Israel was early into the field of helmet-sight slaved missiles with the Python. The first AAM to use helmet sighting was the 1975 V3 Kukri from South Africa.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2614372
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Never heard of such story, I admit. I tried hard to google for all possible word combinations to get some info but could not find a damn thing. If it was such a tremendous spying scandal, as you have poined out, then it should not have passed thru without being left unnoticed. Why there ain’t a single mention of it? Got some better info, Mpacha?

    Possibly because Internet wasn’t so readily available in those days? If you knew anything about SA, you would have heard of Commodore Dieter Gerhard.
    You could also try searching under Kukri. Various publications such as Janes’s Weapon systems and Vlamgat also mention this.

    CRU, it doesn’t really matter what you believe, SA has had the system since 1975. Fact is the system the Russians had during their visit was very similar to South Africa’s.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2614449
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Interesting, thanks.. Yet, it only says that the NAVY was the first user.. Still I don’t see any mention about who was the one to invent the HMS…

    I thought the SAAF was the first to use them operationally in 1975? The Soviets got theirs from South Africa during the worst spy scandle in that countries history. One of the helmets was stolen, later visits to SA revealed that the Russian helmet was almost identical to the SA version.

    in reply to: Can Anyone Identify This Ship? #2062998
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Tsunami!!!

    Correct……..

    Will do a search, thanks Ja Worsley.

    in reply to: Small Airforces pics part II, including Flex' collection #2614813
    Mpacha
    Participant

    oh not again a thread that ends in endless discussions and rowings 😡
    here something very interesting, a early Hind from Sierra Leone with very unusual markings (fin flag) and a Sierra Leone Mi-17 (nicknamed Bokkie)
    both pictures from corbis

    If I remember correctly, Cassie Nel named the Mi-17. He is South African. He also crashed one of the two Hinds. The other needs an engine replacement.

    in reply to: Small Airforces pics part II, including Flex' collection #2614954
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Did you even read my post? I never mentioned scanning entire magazines. What I meant by latitude is that the occasional scanned picture I have found on this and other forums has motivated me personally to buy magazines and books and that jumping all over people as soon as they post a single pitifully low res scanned picture could be counter productive since posting of scanned pictures in moderate quantities on forums like this one generates sales of books and magazines. Of course if people start posting entire magazines that is a whole other cup of tea and should be dealt with. But then again I am not arguing in favor of that!

    Just to name one concrete example, the scanned pictures from the F-7PG article in a recent AFM issue that were posted on the AFM forum are directly responsible for me buying that back issue of AFM. And yes the magazine article contained alot more information than the scanned material posted here so I am happy with my purchase.

    Wind your neck in, yes I did read your post, did you read mine?
    So if I only steal part of your car, then that is not theft? I mean the parts aren’t as good as new parts. Where will you stop? It is either legal or it isn’t.

    If one posts something from a book and mentions that book, then yes I can see that generating sales.

    in reply to: RAF Jaguar overwing Sidewinders #2614978
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Conceptual or actually integrated? Need to know when and where the actual development and integration were done. Like flex said, the overwing “idea” was long before with the British on the Lightning etc but it would be strange if an a/c was offered with that many years before actual integration (outside)?

    It was available on all export versions.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 756 total)