dark light

Mpacha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 756 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2645154
    Mpacha
    Participant

    I am sure that it is the C.7, that is why I said the C.7 😡
    If you get the book Kfir by A.Dor and look at the C.7 cockpit, that is what the Cheetah E cockpit looks like :confused:

    in reply to: Operational Evaluation Comparison: C-130 V C-160 #2645556
    Mpacha
    Participant

    As already stated, the two aircraft aren’t in the same league. The C-130 is for long-range and the C-160 is medium-range.(Although the C-160NG makes up for this with air-to-air refuelling.) The C-130 can carry heavier loads, whilst the C-160 is better for bulkier cargo. The C-160 has the bonus of being able to “kneel” whilst loading. The C-160 is highly manoeuvrable, probably more so than the C-130. The C-160 is ideal for transporting helicopters such as the Puma. The SAAF doing this on several occasions. Probably the most famous being the sea rescue of the crew from the Danish freighter, Pep Ice. The picture shows the C-160’s on Europa Island in the Mozambique Channel, where the Puma was assembled before carrying out the rescue. The C-160 also played a key role in the rescue of the passengers and crew from the MV Oceanos, flying directly from Pretoria to the Transkei coast.
    In the SAAF the C-160 was know as the pocket size HerK, and served brilliantly alongside the C-130.

    in reply to: Landlocked navies #2071941
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Interesting thread 🙂

    Swaziland had a weird one. They had an ocean going yacht which they kept in South Africa. This later became subject to an enquiry after it disappeared??

    The South African Marines operated the “Vredenburger” along the mighty Zambezi River, during the Angolan war. She was armed with a 12.7mm machine gun on the bow and normally two 7.62mm machine guns at the stern.

    The Rhodesian Police took on the task of patrolling Kariba with various patrol boats. Some armed with heavy machine guns and one could even carry a Land Rover. The Zambian Navy patrolled the opposite side with heavily armed 30m aluminium hulled strike-craft. That is until 1978, when the Rhodesian and South African special forces sank their entire navy!?

    in reply to: New Norwich Aviation Museum Exibit! #1437607
    Mpacha
    Participant

    No worries, any moves to get them under cover and I’ll support where I can. Whilst, the current situation is not ideal, it is still way better than a scrapyard! 🙂

    My next planned visit is Coltishall, if only the flipping weather would improve!

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2645867
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Sens

    Trying not to detract from the topic, some details of the SMR-95 performance which you requested.

    General improvements over the ATAR 09K50 result from the introduction of later generation engine technology. The SMR-95 is geometrically similar to the ATAR 09K50 engine but with a higher thrust/weight ratio in the afterburner mode of operation, together with improved fuel consumption. Max dry thrust output of 5040kg and afterburning thrust of 8300kg. (1154kg more thrust than the ATAR 09K50. whilst weighing 200kg less.) Engine acceleration time from idle to MAX. afterburner was 4.5 seconds(one third of the ATAR 09K50), thus allowing rapid throttle changes and alleviation of the IR threat from front sector missiles. During a supersonic climb, the aircraft climbed through 50 000ft at Mach 1.8, still accelerating in the climb.

    The Klimov SMR-95 compared with the ATAR 09K50 required no special handling techniques or attention from the pilot, throughout the flight enevelope of the Mirage F1-AZ.

    Hopefully, this helps. Apologies to the others for wondering off topic!?

    in reply to: New Norwich Aviation Museum Exibit! #1437724
    Mpacha
    Participant

    JINX

    No need to get your knickers in a knot, it was just an observation. We all know the problems with funding etc. But the fact remains that it is sad to see aircraft deteriorating out doors. This does not mean to say that the museum is not doing a fine job, with the means available to them. It is good to hear that plans are in place to fix up these aircraft which are deteriorating!

    DGH

    Actually I’m involved with two museums already, and I do get my hands dirty!
    This has not stopped some exibits rotting away? Small museums just don’t have the funds to look after large aircraft properly……. It is a sad fact.

    in reply to: New Norwich Aviation Museum Exibit! #1437905
    Mpacha
    Participant

    DOUGHNUT

    XX109

    in reply to: UN planes in peacekeeping mission #2646045
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Some more…..

    in reply to: New Norwich Aviation Museum Exibit! #1438021
    Mpacha
    Participant

    A Chinook was going to fly it in, but in the end it came by road.

    I know what you mean Peter, the rest of the aircraft look pretty sad. Unfortunately the Jag will probably look the same in a few years. 🙁

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2646263
    Mpacha
    Participant

    the_baphomet_00

    The cockpit is very similar to the Kfir C7 cockpit, with a few less dials ! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Corgie's Canberra #1438171
    Mpacha
    Participant

    How about a SAAF one next? Love the Buc………… 😀

    in reply to: T-6/Harvards in the U. K. #1552128
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Ok, I’ve done a closer inspection of the poster. It is SAAF serial 7721 and it is being used to advertise Rougham(Spelling?). Is this Harvard in the UK??

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2647738
    Mpacha
    Participant

    flex297

    South Africa is no longer a F1 user :confused:

    Libya is a possible for the F1 SMR-95 refit, most of the others aren’t for the simple reason that they are looking at replacing the F1 in the near future

    Sens, when I get a chance, I’ll get some figures for you. Although the performance was much better on the Cheetah, I only have details on the F1, I’m afraid.

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2647933
    Mpacha
    Participant

    Certainly an interesting slant from Arthur and Sens, but I’m not convinced that the problems with a new engine are as great as they say! Not knowing much about the Kfir, I’ll leave them with their view.

    However, Sens , you are very wrong about the SMR-95 engine refit.
    This was never stopped due to technical problems, but rather due to logistic support philosophies and more importantly due to a change in the South African situation. The refit is still on offer to any potential buyer of the the SAAF Mirage F1. You talk about the expense to reconfigure inlet ducts. Expense is relative. SA had to modify the inlet ducts of the Mirage III’s in order to fit the Atar 09K50’s, these Mirage’s provided excellent service, far out weighing any costs involved? In the case of the RD-33, rather than creating major changes to the fuselage, changes where made to the engine, thus creating the SMR-95.

    Obviously any changes would create there own unique problems, but all that is relative.

    in reply to: T-6/Harvards in the U. K. #1553392
    Mpacha
    Participant

    T J Johansen

    I didn’t think there had been, but there have been posters for various air shows around Suffolk showing one?? Unfortunately I didn’t take note of the reg. :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 756 total)