Is the first one a DC-2?
Fantastic work – especially given the weather here in the last few days. I live just down the road from the airport.
As a general comment I have never understood why people who decide to reside near an active airfield (airfields and their associated activities are pretty much plainly apparent) decide that the noise level is too much and start complaining.
Thanks Moggy – a salutary reminder to anyone who collects items of antique or historical interest. Many years as a collector myself (not of militaria per se) has taught me to always do my research etc. before committing to pay and when in doubt no matter how small don’t buy. And also that even exposure of an item as doubtful will not stop its reappearance on the market.
Maybe I’m being dense here, but what specifically is this petition asking the government to do? It seems that the decision has already been made by the RAF to dispose of the site, future plans to ensure it remains open and accessible are being made, there is still well over a year to go, and there appears to be no imminent threat of closure.
That’s how I read it also.
…we will refrain from inviting members to help because this thread might just degenerate…..!;)
After posts #6 and #10 I thought it already had.
Now what did become of those secret Luftwaffe airfields?
Can’t think of any other big stories about secret goings on – can you Charlie. It would be nice if some of these people had a success or two then we’d all learn something. Apart from the Stork Hotel incident there is one other, it’s on the tip of my tongue but alas memory fails me. I can’t seem to recall it, can you? 😉
People come, people go. It’s the nature of fora.
Moggy
Tend to agree – for instance what happened to that chap who was convinced that the Germans prior to WW2 laid out secret airfields in the sugar beet fields in the east of England? IIRC he was going to prove it and get back to us.
As an aside the swastika was at the time, and before, a symbol of good luck (very popular in the Baltic states e.g. Finland and Latvia). In 1933, apart from Germany, there was no political significance attached to it. In fact it remains a symbol of good luck in many parts of the world at this time. I have several books on Indian archaeology published in the 1970s whose publisher’s logo is a swastika – also the orientation is a thing to note. If the cross is laid out as a vertical square then that is the traditional form while if it is at 45 degrees then that may correspond with the Nazi layout but then again it might not – so context and date is important. Also the arms on the cross may be reversed on the traditional symbol at times. Unless you can find evidence that Mrs James was an early member of the Nazi Party then I wouldn’t read too much significance into the use of it on the Air Yacht.
Much of the Bismark legend seems to stem from the fact that the Royal Navy ‘failed to sink’ the Bismark and that she was, allegedly scuttled by her crew. Well, if your battleship has been reduced to a blazing shambles what else can you claim?
It is a pity that so many men had to die to prove to the Nazi regime that sending surface raiders into the Atlantic Ocean virtually amounted to sending them on a suicide-mission.
Very true – and if the ship was scuttled well so be it because after the damage it took from the pursuing ships of the RN after relentless air shadowing and aerial attacks, it was absolutely useless as a naval asset for the Germans. What were they going to do – send a couple of sea-going tugs supported by the whole Kreigsmarine to tow it back and repair it? The loss of the Hood was a salutary warning about the vulnerability of large under protected warships and the loss of the Bismark was like the Italian Fleet at Taranto, the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbour and the loss of the Renown and Prince of Wales off Malaya in 1941, were early reminders that any ship was easy pickings for an air attack if not screened properly with CAPs and sufficient AA. Surface raiders in the North Atlantic or pretty much anywhere by 1941 were a thing of the past. All that metal, crew and other assets tied up in the Bismark, Tirpitz etc. if used for U boats might well have been sufficient to have won the Battle of the Atlantic for the Germans. For a self-proclaimed super race the Nazis certainly didn’t seem to have super smarts.
Perhaps we need a new thread titled Wot Contributor … 😀
Looks to me like a rather artistic version of this –
And these days no one could afford the fuel 😀
Yeah Merry Whatsit and all that – but don’t go and get swelled heads I’m sure someone will be unhappy with your decisions in 2015.
😀
Ground based Ack-Ack – even if not 20mm did the higher calibre guns use cannister shot with 20mm balls?
Basically AA shells use the effect of a small amount of explosive contained in a frangible case to do the damage – against soft targets like aircraft you don’t need much metal to create catastrophic damage. That also is how most explosive projectiles and air dropped bombs work (expect for the thin case blast bombs e.g. cookies and their related cousins still in use). A small charge is contained in a hardened case and exploded either by a timed fuse, proximity fuse or an impact fuse.
Without seeming or intending to state the obvious, in most cases the resulting irregularly shaped chunks of steel are what cause irregular holes (of course similarly a cannon shell exploding on contact will also create these types of holes – but smaller). In the two pics I suspect that the torn hole in the second is a result of AA – could be wrong. The hole in the prop blade looks like a bullet hole – the slightly distended shape may be due to the bullet hitting a rotating blade – again I could be wrong and without being able to see it I wouldn’t really go beyond that guess.