dark light

Malcolm McKay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vinyl Nose Art #1030690
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    [COLOR=”Blue”]I’ve noticed that with WT660’s original decals, the area of the water-slide transfers is easily discernable from the aluminium paint underneath. I presumed that age had discoloured the shellac or whatever they were made from, having gone a darker golden colour, but I seem to remember Airfix kit transfers in the 1960s were similarly discoloured from new!

    In modelling parlance it’s called yellowing. The old carrier films for decals were basically ordinary clear varnish which yellows over time. Nowadays the carrier films are acrylics and are pretty much non yellowing. To get rid of yellowing on a decal sheet simply tape the decal to the inside of a window that faces the sun and leave for a couple of days – that bleaches the yellow out.

    in reply to: Vinyl Nose Art #1022230
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Somewhere I have an envelope with water slide decals that were applied in the cockpit of a C47. The AVG in Burma’s Flying Tiger and Angels etc. were printed decals that were applied to the aircraft then covered with some dope to keep them on. Which explains why in all the colour pics the area around the image is darker than the rest of the OD. IIRC the Disney studio provided images of various cartoon characters that were applied like decals during WW2. Use of decals is quite common and far simpler than painting everything, especially a lot of stencilled data. Also IIRC when the ex-Saudi Lightnings were returned to the UK they carried RAF markings in the form of stick on decals.

    in reply to: Vinyl Nose Art #1031560
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Somewhere I have an envelope with water slide decals that were applied in the cockpit of a C47. The AVG in Burma’s Flying Tiger and Angels etc. were printed decals that were applied to the aircraft then covered with some dope to keep them on. Which explains why in all the colour pics the area around the image is darker than the rest of the OD. IIRC the Disney studio provided images of various cartoon characters that were applied like decals during WW2. Use of decals is quite common and far simpler than painting everything, especially a lot of stencilled data. Also IIRC when the ex-Saudi Lightnings were returned to the UK they carried RAF markings in the form of stick on decals.

    in reply to: Spent Cartridges- Damage/Injury?? #1049897
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    During the Pearl Harbour attack a great deal of the damage around the city was done by anti-aircraft ordnance of various types and calibres following the immutable laws of gravity, rather than the attackers. This was common to all built up areas defended by AA which were attacked. Even if an AA shell explodes at the height or the proximity intended there are large chunks of heavy sharp metal which have to fall somewhere – all the better reason for heading to a shelter than standing around watching the fireworks display.

    Aside from that a conventional spent bullet or its case are probably not a great threat given their terminal velocity and low mass but a cannon projectile which relies on an explosive charge to do damage is a different kettle of fish, especially given that it relies on a detonator that needs little to set it off and it’s expended case is quite heavy as well.

    in reply to: Boulton Paul Defiant #1054782
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    …Hunter was very much an advocate for the type and believed that if properly used, could be a formidable fighting machine. He introduced tactics where his Defiants would get themselves into a ‘circling wagon’ defensive circle that would make it difficult for single seaters to engage the Defiants. Oddly enough Messerschmitt Bf 110s carried out a similar tactic during the BoB. …

    Yes but as the Me110 demonstrated flying around in a defensive circle might be a bit of a morale booster for the tail gunner and gives the pilot something to do, but unfortunately it is actually quite useless for any aggressive action like shooting down the enemy if they decide to sit back and watch you gamely circling and using up fuel. At some stage you have to cut and run and then you are dead meat.

    The Defiant was an interesting approach to a tactical situation that never actually occurred. So quite rightly it was quickly removed from operations where it was not useful and transferred to night ops where it was.

    in reply to: Tilly Copter #1064797
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Looks too small for the Jeep – however have you considered the Rotachute, that one man unpowered autogyro designed to carry a commando and air towed to the drop zone. That might be a powered means of testing if the rotors will turn up to speed on the ground when towed.

    in reply to: Crashed cheetah engines #1067351
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    … I have found two crashed cheetah engines that would be ideal for spares or as garden ornaments …

    Well a cheetah in the garden would certainly keep door to door salesmen out. 😀

    in reply to: The film Stratigic Air Command… #1079663
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    A film that would have been vastly improved with one more B36 and one less June Allyson.

    in reply to: New BoB film announcement. #1023914
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Personally I do not like CGI – I can never see it as anything other than a hi-tech cartoon.

    in reply to: New BoB film announcement. #1031608
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Personally I do not like CGI – I can never see it as anything other than a hi-tech cartoon.

    in reply to: Prototype to Production difficulties. #1040278
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Have they said which century yet?

    No they haven’t quite decided yet. 😀

    in reply to: Prototype to Production difficulties. #1040433
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I think all of those pale into insignificance compared with the Joint Strike Fighter which the US seems to believe may be in operational service sometime before the end of the century.

    in reply to: "The trusty life saving invention" #1040786
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    And here I was thinking it was a proposed system for providing toilet facilities on small aircraft. :diablo:

    in reply to: Gloster I #1043044
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I believe that is the one and only trial of the experimental inverted take-off system developed to make proper use of the propellor in the marine environment. 😀

    in reply to: Strategic Air Command #1082982
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Great film aircraft wise, but that theme song 😮

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 1,462 total)