[ATTACH=CONFIG]239629[/ATTACH]
O.K. so the wing blanks out the reg but I’m fairly certain this is you. Taken from the punters enclosure so no flying shot. I have another pic but it needs a bit of work – and that one shoes the reg !
No worries Yakrider, 91Regal comes too the rescue!!! Thanks a lot for the pic buddy, that’s me and my Jodel on our way home, I like to keep pic records of airfield visits if possible, do you mind if I save it? Purely for personal use. Cheers.
Nice shots Yakrider and what a nice day it was, I got a very friendly reception from everyone at The Squadron, did you by any chance get any shots of me in my 59 year-old Jodel, G-BDBV? She felt a bit left out parked right up at the far end with the moderns!!!!!
What amazes me in these sometimes inevitable situations is that the museums don’t seem to take advantage of the many private enthusiasts who may be intersted in buying parts or making donations to access bits from an airframe before scrapping. Yes save a cockpit but there are surely plenty of collectors who would be happy to pay scrap value for certain items for their collection rather than it all being smelted down. I would have loved the opertunity to buy something from her for my father who worked with Heralds for years with 5 different airlines yet the first we knew about this was this post!!! Why don’t the museums post on here to offer enthusiasts the chance? Seems to me that some don’t see the private collector as a valuable contribution to the preservation of the heritage!!!!
But do you have the clear plastic ‘bubble’ top to the box – as it adds heaps to the value? If not then repros are available!
Rob
Look at the left side of the top picture, I can see that distinctive yellowing clear plastic of an original cover!!
What a great idea and a worthwhile thing to do. Thumbs up.
If anyone is interested there is a nice, if slightly inaccurate, article on the Times website about the day.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/life/courtsocial/article4461759.ece
The one in the magazine has a very unusual fairing over the upper gun turret position, would that have been added to what is aleady a wreck?
More from St Barts, check out Aveneger at about 1.51, can’t get much lower!!!!
Texas Flying Legends visit St Barts, love the low pass past the yaught. if you can check their Facebook for some more nice stuff.
Most of the parts shown in the auction catalogue are imported and from Canadian Ansons, which is why they are mainly yellow.
There are probably some Aggie Paggie parts there as it was Richard Parr/Retro Aviation that acquired this aircraft from the Hooton Park Trust a few years back and from whom I later acquired the cockpit.
All of the flying surfaces from Aggie Paggie were in this building at one time but now appear to have gone, along with a refurbished Anson fuselage frame. The original fuselage frame from Aggie Paggie (or what was left of it) was cut up to retrieve the cockpit, the centre area having almost crumbled away. I saved the rear section/fin as well and this is in store but the original fuselage, as a complete unit, is now history – and scrap.
The main reason why Aggie Paggie was never restored was because, after much deliberation and assessment by the Museum of Science and Industry, it was deemed too far gone. Any restoration would have required a new fuselage frame and much more besides thereby rendering any resultant restoration fundamentally non-original. Repairs were out of the question as the frame was irreparable due to the almost complete disintegration of what was left.
For graphic evidence of this just have a look at photos of the cockpit during and after recovery earlier in this thread. Aggie Paggie was in so-called preservationists hands for over forty years and ended up like it did so any further opportunity of it being restored using the original parts has long expired.
Anon.
Thanks for the update Mike, what fought my eye was the two wings in the background of items 49 and 50 which have a G reg and possibly the rest of her reg. It would make a lot of sense after reading your reply that these could be hers. Love your cockpit restoration by the way, fabulous.
Are the wings and various other bits from G-AGPG, the one Bill has saved? Would be great if they were and she could be brought back together.
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?115553-G-AGPG-cockpit-saved
Are the wings and other various parts shown here part of her? Some bits, wings included seem the be the same yellow/cream colour. It would be nice to bring her back together.
http://www.hinsonparry.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Retro-Aviation-Ltd-In-Liquidation.pdf
Yes indeed,just watched it, this was a fine sighting,the Blue Herald would be Autair and they also operated 748s GATMI GATMJ. A passenger on a BIA or BUIA Herald from Blackpool also started a big UFO news item,she cine filmed a UFO from a window looking towards the tail. Really good shots of a UFO mving very fast in and out of view. Several weeks later ateam from the BBC sat in the same seat and re created the sighting which was.. a distorted tip of the horizontal stabiliser appearing to move as the camera was moved .
The Blue Heralds shown in that link to the films aren’t in Autair colours, yes they are blue but not the Autair two tone blue and white scheme.
Ballsy Apaches, low and close to the blade tips.
Autair International never operated G-APWJ. I commend Duxford for keeping the airliners in the actual colours in which they served. I would have liked to have seen the 1-11 in BEA ‘red square’ livery, but they changed livery before ‘VMU was delivered. BEA Speedjack would have made a nice change though. If they are going to keep the Herald authentic, they have a choice of British United, British Island Airways or back to that Air Yuk scheme! I would plump for the BUA acheme!:love-struck:
As commendable as keeping an operating scheme is, what’s wrong with using a scheme that the aircraft did not operate in if it represents well a period and operator that was owned by a group that had such an influential effect of the British civil aviation business in the 1960’s. If you don’t want to see a scheme that an aircraft never wore then I assume that most of the aircraft at Duxford need repainting?
If it has to be an authentic scheme then yes go for something other than Air Yuk, not just because it’s not very nice but also because there is one in Yuk colours at Norwich so it’s nice to have a choice.
Nice three blade prop, no idea what off.