Although Keith Sissons is no longer flying displays, he remains actively involved as a member of council of the Historic Aircraft Association.
Thanks Stan
Very interesting to see that New Zealand CAA is much more enlightened regarding ‘Part 115’ Certification.
Sadly the UK CAA and EASA in Europe are still a long way from this.
For example the parts you manufacture, could not be fitted to C of A or CAA Permit aircraft in the UK unless you become a CAA approved manufacturer. (One organisation has been seeking this status for more than two years, has spent hundreds of thousands of pounds and the CAA are still prevaricating!)
There is a meeting this week between the HAA Engineering Group and the CAA to discuss ongoing airworthiness certification of older aircraft. I have forwarded the Part 115 documents to the HAA members taking part!
I can understand the frustration of “Stan Smith”, regarding the pre-war de Havilland types. However he must appreciate he is in a rather small minority of operators
For the vast majority of private owners with de Havilland Tiger Moth and Chipmunk and those with SAL Bulldogs too, the move to a Permit to Fly will offer a significant reduction in bureaucracy and cost of being tied into EASA or CAA paperwork and ‘approved’ parts supplies.
For those operators, such as flying schools wishing to continue to operate those aircraft on Certificates of Airworthiness, it may mean that less users will be left chasing the ever-diminishing pool of CAA-certified parts.
Private owners will be increasing able to use, after due inspection, either original parts which no longer have the correct paperwork or to arrange with LAA Engineering to approve the manufacture of new parts to appropriate specifications. The rigidity of CAA and EASA seems set never to allow this.
The number of private owners who are both willing and able, under control of LAA inspectors, to carry out routine maintenance on aircraft such as Tiger Moths is huge. Just as with other classic types such as Austers and Stampes which have also moved onto LAA Permits in the past year, it will I hope more aeroplanes flying and fewer sitting in the back of hangars.
Meanwhile, this book might come in handy too! :diablo:
The White Waltham Monarch, taken a little more recently. Sadly…..
Ah, tailwheel then.
The only one left on the aeroplane by all accounts….
Pilot is a friend and I am delighted he, if not the aeroplane is OK.
Having chatted with him I can support Propstrike’s hypotheses.
It would be logical to have been filmed around Benson, as the Aerial Film Unit (I think) was based at Benson.
An interesting reference here: http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%201248.html
A Mustang emulating Ray Hanna- looks like Duxford as well.
Clucking bells (or similar!)
I think you are right – copy duly amended. Eric reached mach 0.985 in the DH 108 Swallow in 1946. But he did blow in the windows of the CO’s greenhouse with a boom on his subsequent posting to the US Navy Test Pilots Schools at Pax River!!
The aircraft being flown by Ronald Gilman, who later was a senior BEA and British Airways Captain. He also later restored an Avro Cadet and was the first Chairman of the Vintage Aeroplane Club.
After an operational tour on Beauforts and instructing on Blenheims at Bicester, he was given the job of creating an aerial film unit. He took part in many “interesting” low-level sorties, mainly with Bostons.
The Eindhoven footage was probably shot from a Boston, the initial low level footage is shot in the vicinity of Princes Risborough and the Chilterns ridge and shows Chinnor cement works. I wonder whether he ‘blagged’ a Blenheim V from his old OTU at Bicester for this and or the navigation exercise?
Aeroplane Monthly recorded some of his memoirs in the early 1980s, and his book “The Shiphunters” is recommended reading!
There’s also some post-war footage of Gilman at http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=47460
Just signed up as number 93. C’mon guys lets make it at least 100!!
Ive just got back from Reno. I was about 150yrds from where Galloping Ghost crashed. It had been a great day up until then. I could see thar it wasnt going to clear the stands, but luckly it didnt catch fire. A very sad day.
Dave
Welcome home Dave. Just bl**dy glad you weren’t 150 yds further on!
A very sad day, as you say.
S.
A while since I flew one, but if I remember correctly first stage of flap in Cessna 152 is lift generating, reduces stalling speed, albeit with extra drag steepening the glide angle.
Second and third stages of flap give much increased drag, glide angle gets a lot steeper. Not likely to be much use unless you are very high on the approach.
Whatever the armchair punditry. All credit to the pilot for creating a situation he walked away from.
I suspect there is a PR lesson here, in that a carefully worded, authoritative comment would have ended (most of) the idle speculation!
I suspect there is a PR lesson here, in that a carefully worded, authoritative comment would have ended (most of) the idle speculation!
I suspect the decision regarding future displays in 2011 will be influenced by the difficulty in integrating a new or returning member into the team at such a late stage in the season.
Don’t forget that the team starts its training phase in January, and normally then spends the best part of three months getting ‘up to speed’.