dark light

low'n'slow

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,179 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cross country in a Cub… #416632
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Wow! Thanks for sharing. I’m not jealous of those guys at all. Honest! 😀

    Me neither. Cub flying without frostbite? It’ll never catch on! What a fantastic site though!!

    in reply to: x2 Ski Turbs in formation Dec 2010 Tiger Club #1109452
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Superb, and a rub in and break to make it proper formation flying.

    Don’t you mean a rum in and break? :diablo:

    in reply to: DC-3 Barrel rolling #1109497
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Thanks Don for the work in posting. I wonder why it has suddenly gone quiet ?

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! :dev2:

    in reply to: Blind Landing Vulcan (old thread) #1110362
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Paddy, I hope that you don’t mind my posting this link to your story on pprune

    I am sure many here will appreciate your memories too!

    http://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia/106739-night-london-airport-mine.html

    in reply to: What Is There To Look Forward To In 2011? #1114591
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    This….. :diablo:

    in reply to: Religion and the Battle of Britain #1117131
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    I doubt that the term ‘ethnicity’ ever even entered military brains at the time, nor for many years thereafter.

    The most frequent reason for asking about religion was to establish eligibility for the (C of E) Sunday morning church parades!

    The term “fall out Roman Catholics and Jews” was a favourite with many a Flight Sergeant, as it gave him an excellent source of ‘volunteers’ for cookhouse and other less popular duties!

    in reply to: The Colditz Glider. #1127282
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    That’s correct. The second ‘seat’ in the original, was rear facing, back-to-back behind the pilot under the wing.

    It probably would have been OK on a one-off escape flight, but as the flying replica was built with a view to flying more than once, the extra weight and structural loads of a second occupant were deemed an unnecessary complication.

    in reply to: Spitfire and Hurricane grounded #1128406
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Taunton looks ‘so bracing ‘ !

    Don’t you mean this place?

    in reply to: The Colditz Glider. #1129012
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    The replica is on display at the Norfolk and Suffolk Aviation Museum at Flixton, near Bungay in Suffolk.

    For more on the late Bill Goldfinch, one of the constructors of the original, check this link:

    http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/_OtherSites/LutonMinor/LatestNews18.htm

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1130732
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    ASJA L10 – later became SAAB 17?

    in reply to: Empire of the Clouds – James Hamilton-Paterson #1133082
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Positive review by Johnny de Uphaugh in the latest A******** Monthly. Looks like a good bet for the Christmas present list!

    in reply to: Cessna pilot's £2,000 Royal Fly-past zone bust #417203
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Taking the (well deserved) mickey out of the superbly trained and well-informed Daily Mail hack or hackettes aside…

    …this does raise the point again of the CAA’s NOTAM service still being distributed in a form of hyroglyphics that was originally designed for teleprinters.

    This unfortunate pilot’s main mistake was not realising that the times were UTC/GMT rather than BST, so he apparently bimbled off an hour out.

    Perhaps information in plain English could have avoided embarrasment, a court case and potentially, a very big accident?

    in reply to: Is that a Piston provost??? #1137741
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Maybe the Zlin would make the more interesting restoration project….

    Anyone got a spare space in a returning Globemaster? :diablo:

    in reply to: Atmosphere #1145886
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Fog banks + L-4 Cub + Waddesdon Manor near Aylesbury yesterday = Atmosphere!

    http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/images/flying/1117%20Waddesdon01.JPG

    http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/images/flying/1117%20Waddesdon02.JPG

    http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/images/flying/1117%20Waddesdon03.JPG

    http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/images/flying/1117%20Waddesdon04.JPG

    http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/images/flying/1117%20Waddesdon05.JPG

    in reply to: DC-3 Barrel rolling #1145898
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    I think Melvyn’s remark was based on fact.

    The FAA apparently analysed a number of high-hour DC-3 airframes and came to the conclusion that so long as they meet all airworthiness requirements, ie no corrosion, undue wear, damage etc, the main components of the aeroplane showed no sign of fatigue life issues, therefore there are no hourly, cycle or age-related limits.

    The aircraft is of course, unpressurised, which cuts out a number of significant cyclical stresses – and it is built like a brick outhouse!

    Regarding the barrell roll. I am sure that ‘Skybolt’ will be able to confirm this, but I believe the pilot will have had to satisfy the display organisers of his safety to display the aeroplane in that manner.

    However while a leisurely barrel roll on a Sunday afternoon might be a low-G manouevre – I am pretty sure a few pilots here will testify that a tight display roll is rather more high energy. I will leave it the wisdom of others to discuss whether this roll was appropriate or not.

    Certainly the spirited C-47 display at FL was both approved ahead of the show as part of the Display Authorisation process and I am sure it fully met the high standards set by RIAT’s flying standards committee. Otherwise they wouldn’t have allowed it to happen on successive days!

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,179 total)