Wow! Thanks for sharing. I’m not jealous of those guys at all. Honest! 😀
Me neither. Cub flying without frostbite? It’ll never catch on! What a fantastic site though!!
Superb, and a rub in and break to make it proper formation flying.
Don’t you mean a rum in and break? :diablo:
Thanks Don for the work in posting. I wonder why it has suddenly gone quiet ?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! :dev2:
Paddy, I hope that you don’t mind my posting this link to your story on pprune
I am sure many here will appreciate your memories too!
http://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia/106739-night-london-airport-mine.html
This….. :diablo:
I doubt that the term ‘ethnicity’ ever even entered military brains at the time, nor for many years thereafter.
The most frequent reason for asking about religion was to establish eligibility for the (C of E) Sunday morning church parades!
The term “fall out Roman Catholics and Jews” was a favourite with many a Flight Sergeant, as it gave him an excellent source of ‘volunteers’ for cookhouse and other less popular duties!
That’s correct. The second ‘seat’ in the original, was rear facing, back-to-back behind the pilot under the wing.
It probably would have been OK on a one-off escape flight, but as the flying replica was built with a view to flying more than once, the extra weight and structural loads of a second occupant were deemed an unnecessary complication.
Taunton looks ‘so bracing ‘ !
Don’t you mean this place?
The replica is on display at the Norfolk and Suffolk Aviation Museum at Flixton, near Bungay in Suffolk.
For more on the late Bill Goldfinch, one of the constructors of the original, check this link:
http://www.kingpinmedia.co.uk/_OtherSites/LutonMinor/LatestNews18.htm
ASJA L10 – later became SAAB 17?
Positive review by Johnny de Uphaugh in the latest A******** Monthly. Looks like a good bet for the Christmas present list!
Taking the (well deserved) mickey out of the superbly trained and well-informed Daily Mail hack or hackettes aside…
…this does raise the point again of the CAA’s NOTAM service still being distributed in a form of hyroglyphics that was originally designed for teleprinters.
This unfortunate pilot’s main mistake was not realising that the times were UTC/GMT rather than BST, so he apparently bimbled off an hour out.
Perhaps information in plain English could have avoided embarrasment, a court case and potentially, a very big accident?
Maybe the Zlin would make the more interesting restoration project….
Anyone got a spare space in a returning Globemaster? :diablo:
Fog banks + L-4 Cub + Waddesdon Manor near Aylesbury yesterday = Atmosphere!
I think Melvyn’s remark was based on fact.
The FAA apparently analysed a number of high-hour DC-3 airframes and came to the conclusion that so long as they meet all airworthiness requirements, ie no corrosion, undue wear, damage etc, the main components of the aeroplane showed no sign of fatigue life issues, therefore there are no hourly, cycle or age-related limits.
The aircraft is of course, unpressurised, which cuts out a number of significant cyclical stresses – and it is built like a brick outhouse!
Regarding the barrell roll. I am sure that ‘Skybolt’ will be able to confirm this, but I believe the pilot will have had to satisfy the display organisers of his safety to display the aeroplane in that manner.
However while a leisurely barrel roll on a Sunday afternoon might be a low-G manouevre – I am pretty sure a few pilots here will testify that a tight display roll is rather more high energy. I will leave it the wisdom of others to discuss whether this roll was appropriate or not.
Certainly the spirited C-47 display at FL was both approved ahead of the show as part of the Display Authorisation process and I am sure it fully met the high standards set by RIAT’s flying standards committee. Otherwise they wouldn’t have allowed it to happen on successive days!