dark light

low'n'slow

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 1,179 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Popular Flying #1222458
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    ;):D

    in reply to: Popular Flying #1222579
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    I’ve got a few 1937 editions, but it doesn’t appear in any that I have to hand.

    I did loan some copies to a well-known magazine editor (you know who you are!) so this might prompt my regaining them!! 😀

    in reply to: The Air Cafe! #1222581
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    I seem to recollect a similar style of bar/restaurant in Antwerp, under the approach to Duerne airport. Is it still there I wonder?

    Of course, you don’t need to go that far, Northampton will do!

    in reply to: Little Gransden #500155
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    ….. it was only a bit of mist , it had almost cleared by 3 o’clock:rolleyes::rolleyes: spike

    Oh no it wasn’t 😮

    Having been on standby at Bicester from 8am to try and find a way through to take up a ‘visitor’ slot, I can testify that for the first time ever, we were experiencing a combined thunderstorm AND fog!!

    Then the weather went downhill after that!!

    in reply to: 1930s gliding in Sussex #1224490
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Can’t help with TMAC but you might find this video fooage of interest!
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=cEOZsA0sI34

    in reply to: Ideas for storing my aircraft project #1227133
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    A number of farm strips around here use horticultural ‘polytunnels’ for hangarage. I don’t know how costs compare with Protech, but may be worth a look.

    Before you commit to a bunch of stuff in your back garden, don’t forget local farmers may have a space in a barn or agricultural building you might get for a reasonable donation!

    It might even be worth asking at your local LAA strut or microlight club. Someone might be looking for a use for their workshop space if they’ve just got a project flying!

    in reply to: Currie Super Wot, G-AVEY #1227993
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Pobjoy pilots will tell you they neeed two hours engine tinkering for every hour in the air.

    As little as that?? It takes that long just to pre-lubricate the rockers for each flight! 😉

    The Super Wot though looks like a lovely aeroplane, although according to G-INFO it hasn’t had a permit to fly this year. Might I suggest that the owner is taking it somewhere to receive a little TLC? Hopefully we’ll see it in the air sometime soon.

    in reply to: How to recover an inverted aeroplane #432580
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    My best guess is to take it back the way it came, via the nose.

    If the wing roots can be supported to take the load off the engine mounts, so much the better.

    Once the tail gets past the vertical, the rear fuselage needs supporting. There have been cases of broken fuselages and bent metal longerons from the tail being allowed to crash to earth.

    Assuming it wasn’t on full power and it merely shattered a wooden prop, a full shockload strip on the engine may not be necessary. A crankshaft runout test and close inspection of the crankcase for cracks may be sufficient.

    I’d guess though that they will need to closely check the tubular steel engine mountings. They are normally designed to take loads via tension, or the vertical load when static, rather than the weight of the whole aeroplane in compression.

    I guess the fin and rudder are history and again the rear fuselage and cabane struts will have taken some unusual loads, not in their normal stressing!

    Very sad, but its not the first Flitzer to suffer this fate and they’ve all made it back into the air again!

    in reply to: Vulcan At Brize Norton! #1228678
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Says an awful lot about the current state of our defence, when the base of our supposed 24hr round the clock AEW/AWACS, or whatever the Sentry is these days, is closed on Sundays…..:(

    Shhhh. Don’t tell the Russians! :diablo:

    in reply to: Tempest II restoration, any updates? #1229320
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    There is at least one Sabre engine under long-term restoration to airworthiness and the guys working on it are happy that it will be sufficiently reliable to operate.

    The big issue is, as always, cost. The last time I heard from them, they told me that the labour costs on merely stripping the Sabre, were about the same as for a complete rebuild on a Merlin! 😮

    in reply to: Should a national body step in #1230269
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    What important role was that? Compared to , say, the C-130, the Beverley was not much of a success, and seemed to be used to used to support the last fading outposts of the British Empire in place like Aden.

    The Beverley seem to be remembered more for its unreliability ( engines) than almost anything else. They are quirky, ugly, and just the kind of aeroplanes I love, but I can’t afford to put a roof over it, and I have doubts that the kind of money required (£150k?) could be found.

    To put it in perspective, the first production Beverley made its first flight on 30 July 1955. The prototype YC-130 Hercules made its first flight in 1954, deliveries began in 1956. Unlike the Beverley it is still in service!

    The Beverley was dead-slow. From the UK to Singapore, it was about 30 hours flying time spread over a minimum of three days. And you had to choose whether to carry payload or fuel for some of the longer sectors. A former Beverley pilot once told me that it was an excellent aeroplane…..so long as you wanted fly a load of ping-pong balls, slowly, around the world.

    Maybe after Boris Johnson’s “ping pong’s coming home” speech at the Beijing Olympic’s we can get him to sponsor it! :diablo:

    in reply to: Spit at Wellesbourne #1230312
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    According to the IMDb website and the film’s own site, the locations used were the disused Hradcany Airport in the Czech Republic and Fowlmere in the UK.

    My first guess was the latter location for the pic, but surely Fowlmere’s hangar is in far better condition than that??

    in reply to: GUESS WHAT! #1233808
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Is it a reversing light ?:D:D:D the clue being your login name ? :rolleyes:

    spike

    No. I saw Martin’s car upside down a lot of times and that top picture doesn’t look familiar 😀

    in reply to: WANTED – Ideas for a documentary film… #1235244
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    How about aircraft restoration projects – what out there has been found in a barn and is being rebuilt to fly…

    FB

    I can think of a BE-2c replica!! 😀

    in reply to: De Havilland Moth Club Vintage Air Tour. #1236059
    low’n’slow
    Participant

    Most overflew but the Dragon captain took the trouble to do a low pass and give a vigorous wave to those below.

    Tim

    That would be Henry Labouchere then! 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 1,179 total)