Interesting to see G-AKVN ‘out West’. It normally lurks in darkest Norfolk!
Meanwhile still further West, a ‘barn queen’ C-3 and an ‘intercept’ last year over the Hudson river!
I think Blue Max was more interested in this one!
Lovely to see G-AYKT again. As a snotty-nosed ‘hangar brat’ I logged a lot of right hand seat time out of Teesside in her in the early 1970s, thanks to her then owners Bill Gillham and John Gladdish. The latter had made his first solo in 1917 in an RNAS Avro 504!!
Come to think of it. Thirty years on. Stilly snotty-nosed, still flying the same type of aeroplanes!
Before you even start Bod…..Noooooooooooooooo :diablo:
Holy Macaroni! Did they get away with it? 😮
Maybe..maybe not 😉
Even the “professionals” do it sometimes! :diablo:
Great! Congratulations to all involved. Must be a great feeling.
Don’t forget though. 90% completed….90% still to go!! 😉
The old Eastchurch airfield site has been a prison for many years but is now being given up(strange as I thought we were short of prisons) and the local council has an ambitious project, utilising the old WW1 hangars as a museum/visitor centre.
Details on their web site. http://www.theflyingstart.co.uk/main4.htmHas anyone any pictures taken at Easchurch, a relative was stationed their for a while.
Not entirely sure, but we suspect the attached were taken at Eastchurch in 1915-16. Even less sure what the bloke’s doing up the flagpole! 😀
Hope the Flying Start folks leave enough room for a landing strip. Would love to take the BE replica in there one day!
Come to think of it – how about a “Shuttleworth of the South”??
And specially for Propstrike after his comments on Pushpak/Pietenpol formation speeds…….some REAL Aeronca formation flying 😀
Not the Hurricane or the Chipmunk…..obviously!:eek:
Nice stuff Armwaver.
Here’s one of Propstrike ……and one from BTUM too! 😀
MC. Don’t worry about the Tiger. I suspect they were designed to humble people like us!! If you’re going to be passing Bicester anytime PM me and I’ll arrange a prod around Piets and Pushpaks and things!
Steve
But don’t try these at home folks! 😮
Just had a Google for the Piet and looked at some of the websites. The more I find out about them the more I like them. Looking at the Piet and the Taylor E2 I get the impression of variations on a theme. Now which came first? Was it a case of Taylor building the E2 and Pietenpol deciding he could build his own cheaper? Or did Pietenpol build the Aircamper and Taylor decide that it was a good idea and he’d offer a factory built competitor?
I guess they developed in parallel. I think that Bernie Pietenpol always intended his as a homebuilt while the Taylor brothers were more focussed on production aeroplanes.
The control forces (and weight) of the Piet is generally lighter than the Tiger Moth. Although the elevator is possibly a little less effective, the ailerons are little better. Its a very different experience to a modern Cessna or Warrior. Get in touch with one of the UK Pietenpol club members, I’m sure they’ll be delighted to let you sample the aeroplane!
Love the pics of your T-craft on skis Baldeagle. You might also recognise this Piet 😀
The Pietenpol looks a cracking little machine, can anyone tell me what they’re like to fly. I expect the usual remarks like ‘it’s great if you’re not in a hurry and terrific for enjoying being in the air on a still summer evening.’ But what is it like from other aspects like control harmony and response? It’s a machine I’ve seen around but know nothing about.
The Piet is a lovely machine, but like most homebuilts, they vary quite a lot from aeroplane to aeroplane. They certainly are a lovely way of introducing one to proper open cockpit vintage flying.
From the limited time I’ve had in the front cockpit of G-ADRA, I’ll confirm the ‘not in a hurry’ and ‘summer evening’ comments. The cruise speed is about 65mph and with a light wing loading, a gusty day or lots of thermals will have the poor old girl bouncing around like a cork on boiling water.
Like other ultralights of the era, you can’t simply bung two lardy blokes in the cockpit and go flying. With just 65hp in the nose, G-ADRA relies on the curvature of the earth to gain height if fully laden!
Handling characteristics are a lot lighter than the Aeronca, a little lighter than a Cub, a little heavier than the Luton Minor, but typically vintage in that you need to use the rudder all the time to initiate and balance the turns. Mind you after 20 or so years of flying G-ADRA, I think Arthur’s got it sussed!
There’s a great website for British Pietenplodders at http://www.pietenpolclub.co.uk !