dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Radiation Exposure from flying #579113
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    …Whats next radiation badges for crew? :p

    Actually Andrew we sort of have these already!!! Virgin and most of the serious airlines have radiation monitoring programs. The recommended maximum annual dose is 20 milliSieverts. Virgin sets a company max annual dose of 6 milliSieverts and our rosters are arranged so that we do not exceed that amount. The highest dose route is LHR-NRT as that takes us closest to the North Pole. The Earths magnetic field and thinness of the atmosphere at the poles causes the least protection in these places. As we have Japanese crew members who solely do the Tokyo run these guys and girls are the highest risk employees in the company. Consequently you will sometimes find Japanese crew members on the Joburg route (the least risk) so that the company can still get productivity from them without having to ground them for reaching their annual radiation limit.

    By the way, I average 3 trips (6 sectors) a month and typically go transatlantic once every other month. Our 747 bods go transatlantic every time they get off the ground (poor boys!).

    in reply to: Calling All Luton Minor Owners! #400018
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    The Luton(!) Duet is owned by a mate of mine who also has a Luton Minor and a Luton Major. Despite several offers to fly the Duet I have never managed to get round to it. One thing that should be realised is that the Duet is actually nothing to do with Luton. I believe the plans were once available from Phoenix who also were once supplying Luton Minor plans and that is the only similarity. With regards to weight carrying…I know my friends son (20 something year old male) has flown it with other not-too-big adults. Perhaps treating it as one adult + one child is the way ahead for this aircraft.

    in reply to: Photo of the year…and no it's not Sam Chui #582314
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    As a talking point…

    That shot really shows very well just how much drag the process of raising or lowering the gear can make.

    in reply to: United 93 #584314
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    As I’ve said before…

    If the gun is kept in the cockpit as the last line of defense the pilots can use in case of breach of the flightdeck door then that is the one place it can be stored where it CANNOT BE USED BY AN INTRUDER to gain access. Sitting there as we do at present with nothing means we are defenseless against inevitable intrusion. A gun in the flightdeck could be the final opportunity to save lives.

    in reply to: What would happen this a/c in a crosswind? #586619
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    In the UK the preference for most airlines is to use the crab method. At JMC we briefly tried using the wing down technique on the 757 as there was enough clearance. The reason it was changed back to the crab method was because that when you hold the wing down you end up in a forward slip balanced with a bit of opposite rudder. Not only can this be uncomfortable for passengers but more importantly in stronger crosswinds the held in roll input could mean roll spoilers are deployed. This asymetric drag really isn’t a good idea in the flare.

    in reply to: Hi , some questions #587079
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Nice to have you with us.

    in reply to: Finnair's first Airbus A340 #587528
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Ex- G-VFLY

    …and I too think these mostly white schemes allow the shape of the aircraft to be seen rather than jazzy glitz all over the place.

    in reply to: What would happen this a/c in a crosswind? #587532
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Similar problems with 4 wing mounted engine aircraft. A340 has a tolerance of 7 degrees wing down before we start getting edgy about a pod scrape.

    There are 2 techniques for coping with a crosswind. Firstly a wing down technique as demonstrated by the Ryanair photo. By keeping a wing down you slip into the wind at the same rate it drifts you off your desired track keeping the fuselage pointing straight down the runway. The upwind undercarriage touches down first before you lower the other on. Problem as you know is wing/engine clearance. If this is an issue then you can use the crab technique. Here you keep the wings level but head the aircraft into wind but keep the resultant track down the runway. Just before touchdown you apply downwind side rudder to align the wheels with the runway. On the 340 when you apply the rudder during the flare (known as kicking off drift) there is also a big rolling action in the direction the rudder is applied so you end up having to apply opposite sidestick as well.

    in reply to: Name the aircraft… #587541
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    They were the largest operator of the type when they operated 8. I would imagine that is still the case now they operate 6.

    in reply to: Jumbos #587545
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Yes. Standard fit is seats for 3 flightcrew + 2 jumpseats on the left hand side behind the skipper.

    in reply to: Name the aircraft… #588599
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Aurigny paid their Tri pilots about 25 grand before tax when I was there. At the same time a company called SkyTrek operated Tri’s out of Lydd. They paid their Captains 6 grand a year before tax and their FO’s 0 (yes, 0!).

    Half the Aurigny Tri pilots are southern hemisphere guys (with lots of bush flying experience) trying to get their foot in the European aviation door while the other half tend to be Brits who can financially support themselves by other means who treat flying the Tri similar to going down to the flying club and renting an aircraft by the hour for fun.

    in reply to: Pic of the day, June 15 #589647
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    I get to fly a lot of brand new aeroplanes at the moment and yes they do have a new car smell (with a tinge of garlic). Personally I prefer to fly aeroplanes that are about 6 months old as that way someone else has sorted out all the niggles you always get with a brand new aircraft. In fact Chuck Yeager summed it up nicely when he said ‘never fly the A model of anything’.

    in reply to: Jumbos #589841
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Actually no. A cruise pilot is a pilot who is only qualified to fly the cruise part of the flight (as used to be used by Virgin, currently used by Cathay, etc). I sometimes operate as a relief pilot but I am not a cruise pilot as I am qualified to occupy the right seat at all times and act as commander when the Captain is on rest (APIC – acting pilot in command).

    in reply to: Jumbos #590457
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    That would be a relief crew member rather than a supernumary. A supernumary (by the names very definition) is not a required member of crew whereas a relief pilot would be required to allow the operating flightdeck crew members the chance to rest in order to extend their flight duty period.

    To give you an idea of how it works…
    The third crew member would get into one of the seats around top of climb or shortly after. The operating crew member can go off to either an assigned passenger seat or preferably a crew rest bunk for a period of time. After that time he returns to the flightdeck and resumes his seat. The relief pilot then swaps with the other pilot while he takes his rest. The length of time that they can extend their 2 pilot permitted duty by is half the time they have been resting for if they have been in a bunk or a third of their rest time if they have been in a seat. For example, if the relief guy is operational for, say, 6 hours then each pilot gets 3 hours kip. If they have been in the bunk then the duty time can be extended by 1.5 hours or if only seats were available then the extension would be 1 hour. The original 2 pilots will complete the flight using the extension to their flight duty time.
    Now if there were 2 relief pilots (ie a 4 pilot flight) then both operating pilots would be able to go on rest together so they would get the entire 6 hour period in the bunk so therefore they can have an extension of 3 hours (2 hours for a seat).
    The difference between resting in a bunk or in a passenger seat is immense. This is an area where we are very lucky as we have bunks in every company aircraft whereas BA mostly have seats only for crew rest on their 777 fleet although I gather they plan to rectify this with future orders.

    in reply to: Name the aircraft… #590646
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Aurigny actually built a few of their Trislanders themselves from kits supplied by Britten-Norman. When I left they had a few spare unused wing sets that they could bolt on to existing fuselages when their original wings cycles were expired. Skycruiser and I have both had a few goes flying them and they really are good fun. Fortunately they fly much better than they look!

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 3,331 total)