dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,656 through 2,670 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boeing 737 Fuels Virgin Blue Expansion #685352
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Boeing 737 Fuels Virgin Blue Expansion

    Saab – I don’t know anything about their new planned routes to the Oceanic regions but if they involve any ETOPS sectors they won’y be using 737s as the type is not approved for ETOPS due to lack of system redundancy (i.e. it only has duplication not triplication).

    in reply to: Boeing 737 Fuels Virgin Blue Expansion #685545
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Boeing 737 Fuels Virgin Blue Expansion

    I would imagine the generally better Australian weather when compared to North-West Europe makes the 737’s lack of Cat 3b capability less important.
    There definitely seems to be a trend here with 737 operators saying they get better seat/mile operating costs than the competition and yet Airbus operators saying the same thing!

    in reply to: IB A340 PIC #685548
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: IB A340 PIC

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 16-01-03 AT 07:29 PM (GMT)]Putting the nosewheels on the centerline is exactly what you mustn’t do because of the reasons mentioned above. With the nosewheels following the centerline the mainwheels are out of position by several meters on this A340. It would be even worse on the A340-600. The main wheels should always straddle the centerline. This means sticking the nose well out before starting a turn. When Boeing built the 747 they actually built a test taxiing device using a lorry to see whether pilots could judge the distances involved to get the airframe round corners.
    Landing on R05 at Funchal if you don’t make the right turn off you have to turn around within the runway width and backtrack to the terminal. This is done on the part of the runway that is supported on 150′ high stilts above the sea. Even in the shorter 757-200 this involves hanging the flightdeck over the 150′ drop to get round the corner which still makes me very nervous!

    The monitors (as shown in Kab’s post) are standard fit on the 777 and A340 (500 and 600 series). I think they are an option on the 747 and that’s probably the case on the 737 but I don’t know of anyone whose taken it up.

    in reply to: BA LGW-GCI news for Saab 2000 #685551
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: BA LGW-GCI news for Saab 2000

    Interesting conversation with my brother today. Apparantly the CFM engine in the 500 series is significantly ‘chipped down’ from how it is in the 300. As a result even though the 500 weighs significantly less it doesn’t perform as well. A lot of BA staff think it would be better to put the 300 on the route for performance reasons but the planners won’t allow this as the load limitation would cause less seat wastage on a 500 compared to the 300. The plan is that only ATR type seat numbers will be sold for the 737 flights.

    in reply to: BA LGW-GCI news for Saab 2000 #685731
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: BA LGW-GCI news for Saab 2000

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 16-01-03 AT 08:54 AM (GMT)]That 737 must depart GCI with the bare minimum fuel to make it to JER. I would also imagine it only picks up a half load of passengers in GCI and then tops up with passengers in JER. Can you find out if that’s the case Saab?

    in reply to: General Discussion #385395
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Fog / Mist

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 16-01-03 AT 08:36 AM (GMT)]Good advice from our friend who permanently lives in fog 😉 !!!

    In aviation terms there is a clear definition. Visibility 1000m or less is fog, between 1000m and 5000m is mist and 5000 to 10000m is haze.

    There are 2 principle ways mist or fog can form defined as Radiation or Advection. Radiation fog is formed typically during the night when the heating of the sun has disappeared and the air cools below the dew point forming condensation which hangs in the air. Advection fog is what is experienced in Guernsey where a warm air stream blows over cooler land which forces the moisture in the air (which has been collected after blowing accross the sea surface) to condense. A notable difference between the 2 types of fog is that Radiation fog needs still air while Advection requires a bit of wind.

    Regards
    wys

    in reply to: Fog / Mist #1966677
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Fog / Mist

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 16-01-03 AT 08:36 AM (GMT)]Good advice from our friend who permanently lives in fog 😉 !!!

    In aviation terms there is a clear definition. Visibility 1000m or less is fog, between 1000m and 5000m is mist and 5000 to 10000m is haze.

    There are 2 principle ways mist or fog can form defined as Radiation or Advection. Radiation fog is formed typically during the night when the heating of the sun has disappeared and the air cools below the dew point forming condensation which hangs in the air. Advection fog is what is experienced in Guernsey where a warm air stream blows over cooler land which forces the moisture in the air (which has been collected after blowing accross the sea surface) to condense. A notable difference between the 2 types of fog is that Radiation fog needs still air while Advection requires a bit of wind.

    Regards
    wys

    in reply to: Euroceltic F27 Crash at Silgo pics #685928
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Euroceltic F27 Crash at Silgo pics

    EZY would be interested to see if any negotiation is available at all.

    in reply to: IB A340 PIC #686081
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: IB A340 PIC

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 15-01-03 AT 10:01 AM (GMT)]Unfortunately the insurance company will accept no deviation from the line without significant justification and then only with the aid of a marshaller. These guys are out of position by several meters and cannot see the wingtips from the cockpit to check their own clearance. They haven’t in reality saved any time by cutting the corner by a few meters but they have put a multi-million dollar machine at significant unneccessary risk.
    Seperate from the insurance issue, on a 757 if you follow the yellow lines with the nosewheel rather than the main wheels the geometry is such that the main wheels will end up cutting the corner of the turn enough to get you stuck in the grass on any typical 90 degree bend. If the grass is wet it is unlikely you will get out again as the bogie is likely to sink under the weight up to its axles. This guy looks like he is trying to put the nosewheel on the line and look where that leaves the main gear. If that was a normal narrow taxiway they would be stuffed.

    in reply to: BA LGW-GCI news for Saab 2000 #686091
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: BA LGW-GCI news for Saab 2000

    Yes, I was wondering if it could be enough of a trigger to encourage a change to the ATR. I think Aurigny’s main interest would be to stop Flybe’s dominance. By the way the list doesn’t show Aurigny’s main GCI route to STN.
    Saab – can you confirm that SATA are using the 733 to Funchal and that it doesn’t involve a tech stop somewhere to uplift fuel. Surely it can’t haul itself and all that fuel and all those passengers out of that short runway.

    in reply to: News — AF Concorde nose fails in flight. #686094
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Wysiwygs F-4 mate……..

    A guy called Andy Mattacks owns and runs a Trident 3 sim (the ex-BA one) near Biggin (which I occasionally do a bit of instructing in). He has a web site http://www.tridentsim.com which has a bit of info about the current status of his friends phantom sim on it. Alternatively contact him on 01883 652109.

    in reply to: Euroceltic F27 Crash at Silgo pics #686098
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Euroceltic F27 Crash at Silgo pics

    I would think EZY will be very interested in seeing what landing fee reduction Euroceltic negotiate!

    in reply to: IB A340 PIC #686103
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: IB A340 PIC

    A MyTravel A330 lost a wingtip in Paphos last summer by not following the lines.

    in reply to: 1 year gone…. #686107
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: 1 year gone….

    This is purely a guess but we frequently have problems with ground crews driving steps and lorries into the aircraft structure. I wonder if it is designed to make them more aware of what is around them?

    in reply to: IB A340 PIC #686481
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: IB A340 PIC

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 14-01-03 AT 10:52 AM (GMT)]Lovely picture but the flightcrew should be shot for not following the taxiway center line. That center main gear should be right over the line to guarantee wing tip clearance. If I was photographed doing that I would expect an invite for tea and biscuits (without biscuits) in Manchester!

Viewing 15 posts - 2,656 through 2,670 (of 3,331 total)