dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Toilet waste disposel in mid-flight #739920
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Toilet waste disposel in mid-flight

    A bit more research for you –
    In the 1930’s the World Health Organisation (or whatever their name was in their day) compiled a study of worldwide Cholera outbreaks and discovered that there was an increased risk underneath the then used air routes. Whether this was genuinely true or not I don’t know but the outcome was a ban on all overboard toilet dumping by aircraft. As a result there has been no commercial aircraft with the facility to manually dump the latrines for at least 60 years. If (and I must emphasise the IF) there has genuinely been human waste that has fallen from an aircraft it can only be residual dribble from a stuck valve that has been frozen and then fallen off as the temperature rises as the aircraft descends to land. The airline has no control over this and the quantities involved will be minimal as the freezing of the resiue in the climb quickly blocks any leak.
    Now consider this. On a 757 we typically aim to land with 4 to 5 tonnes of fuel left in the tanks to cover a diversion and subsequent holding. This fuel has spent hours being cooled to temperatures below minus 40 degrees centigrade and will take forever to warm up again. Now you descend through a wet airmass (i.e. a cloud layer) and this extremely cold fuel (and therefore entire wing) is now the perfect spot for all this moisture to accumulate as ice. As pilots we are obliged to switch on airframe anti-icing systems which shed the ice and gravity then does it’s thing. Then matey phones the papers and says something has just fallen through his shed roof and the tabloids think – great, an opportunity to be sensationalistic (is that a word?) and QED.

    Feedback please.

    in reply to: Isle of Man / IOM #739954
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Isle of Man / IOM

    Greekdude – when I used to do long haul I was frequently operating to Dulles (Washington DC) and always remember seeing more J31’s (and J41’s) than I thought possible!
    By the way, the crew figures I mentioned earlier are just the legal minimums. Any reputable carrier would still provide a cabin crew member on a 19 seater, it’s just that they are not obliged to.

    in reply to: Trilander #740001
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Trilander

    Rules is rules. Everything onboard has to be approved right down to the carpet.
    By the way I made some enquiries and I found a nice man who will sell a 3 blade Hoffman Trislander prop for £10,000. Oh yes, it is approved!!!!!!!! 🙂

    in reply to: Isle of Man / IOM #740003
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Isle of Man / IOM

    You’re right, it’s not just an American thing, I just mentioned them as they seemed to take up more 19 seaters than any other country I know. If you have 20 seats or more you have to carry a flight attendant for very 50 seats (or part thereof) that the aircraft carries. Therefore on a 235 seat 757 you must legally have a minimum of 5 crew but if you have a scheduled config of (say) 195 you only need 4.

    in reply to: Help Wanted Please #740301
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Help Wanted Please

    And don’t forget ‘baby’!!! Whoever came up with that should be shot!

    in reply to: Pic Of The Day-Air India B747! #740307
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Pic Of The Day-Air India B747!

    ‘your palace in the sky’! Do they still say that on the side Kabir?

    in reply to: Isle of Man / IOM #740314
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Isle of Man / IOM

    Eek, damn ugly aeroplane! …and it’s only a 19 seater. Must be on a wet lease. 19 seaters have always been popular in the states as they are not legally obliged to carry a cabin attendant if you have less than 20 seats.

    in reply to: Bad Flight? #740316
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Bad Flight?

    Skog – When de-icing you have to turn the bleeds off (stopping air conditioning and pressurisation) in order to stop the fluid getting into the cabin (it can generate a dreadful burning smell). If the fluid was coming through the underside of the doors then that was the fault of the guy operating the rig. I guess it was a 200 series you were on as they have huge gaps around the doors (just like the 1-11).
    Also, if the runway is of a reasonable length and the terminal you are going to is near the far end you would normally choose to select minimal autobrake and exit further down as this gets you to the terminal quicker improving the block time of the flight. The added bonus to this is that the brakes end up much cooler and so don’t enforce a long cooling off period before the next departure. Surprisingly it does not reduce brake wear as with carbon brakes wear is proportional to the number of applications rather than how hard or long they are applied for. As a result when taxiing with carbon brakes (as opposed to aircraft fitted with steel brakes) you will often ride the brakes to avoid repeated applications.

    in reply to: General Discussion #421732
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Celebrity Big Brother 2 ! !

    Chris Moyles and the Queen!

    in reply to: Celebrity Big Brother 2 ! ! #1987388
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Celebrity Big Brother 2 ! !

    Chris Moyles and the Queen!

    in reply to: Toilet waste disposel in mid-flight #740396
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Toilet waste disposel in mid-flight

    Thanks Mongu. I have changed my profile so hopefully now it will work.

    in reply to: Trilander #740398
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Trilander

    Couldn’t give you a price but it will be immense as everything on a public transport aircraft has to be approved. A few years ago a friend of my wife (who was in charge of ordering certain cabin equipment for new B744’s that Virgin acquired) told me that a magazine rack (bulkhead mounted and nothing more than a small piece of moulded plastic) cost nearly £500! A single coffee pot for the galley was £120. You can’t go elsewhere as you have to buy an ‘approved’ coffee pot!
    Getting back to the point, you cannot just buy an extra blade. The hub mechanisms, constant speed drive units and even the blades themselves are all specific.

    in reply to: Trilander #740409
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Trilander

    No, they all spin at the same rpm (aa set by the pilot) but as the 3 blade props are a smaller diameter the prop tips scribe a smaller circle than the 2 blade prop in the same time so their tip speed is slower (subsonic) at max rpm.

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: Toilet waste disposel in mid-flight #740417
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Toilet waste disposel in mid-flight

    I’m sorry Greekdude, I don’t understand. Can you explain?

    in reply to: Tristar Tribute. #740427
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    RE: Tristar Tribute.

    STOP PRESS – The TriStar may yet make a return to Gatwick with a new start up called British Carribean!

Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 3,331 total)