dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anti Collision Beacons. #590102
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Does Virgin use/have logo lights on all their aircraft? I think it’s Delta here in the States that doesn’t have them installed, perhaps a few other operators as well.

    I think they are fitted on our 744’s. On the A340 they are completely automatic and turn on whenever either the main gear legs are compressed or when the gear legs are uncompressed and the flaps are not retracted.

    The 757 and the Saab 340 had them opn separate switches on the overhead. Is that the same as the Embraer?

    in reply to: Anti Collision Beacons. #590850
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Just to elaborate a bit more…

    The (anti-collision) beacon is the (usually) red thing on the top and bottom. This is usually turned on immediately prior to engine start/push back and turned off after engine shut down.

    The strobes are very brilliant dazzling white flashers usually located on the wingtips (on large commercial aircraft). Boeing ones tend to do a single flash while Airbus ones generally do a double flash. These are usually turned on when entering an active runway and remain on until vacating the runway after landing. They must not be used on the ground as the energy levels involved are very high and represent a risk around things such as fuel bowsers. They can also bring about epileptic fits in certain individuals and have been known to cause such distraction to other taxying aircraft that their use on the ground tends to increase ground collisions!

    Nav lights are the red, green and white steady lights. They are only legally required for flying at night however most airlines SOP’s suggest using them at all times, The red light is located on the left wing tip and is visible from the front and left, the green light is on the right wing tip and can be seen from the front and right. The white light(s) are usually located on the tail (although the 757 had them on the back of the wingtips) and are visible from the rear.

    Hope this is of interest.

    in reply to: MAN 11-06-05 (Part Two) #590853
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    As other people have mentioned, the red lines indicate an area where there must be no deformation to the aircraft skin or it will be likely to affect the pressure sensors (static ports) supplying information to the air data computers.

    in reply to: Anti Collision Beacons. #590861
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Can be either red or white and there is no requirement for multiple ones to be sequenced afaik. I’ve only ever seen installations where one switch turns on all…however on the A340 if you turn on the taxi camera system the lower beacon will switch off so you don’t blind yourself!

    Tenthije – you’re mixing a bit of beacon, strobes and nav lights all together with your answer!

    in reply to: Best Aero Engines #590863
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    WD and Vortex – thanks for some really helpful stuff. I can’t admit to understanding all of it just yet but I’m working on it!

    in reply to: Dart Group 757s #591883
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Advert for flightcrew in Flight was for LBA basings…but that could easily be changed.

    in reply to: Living the dream #591889
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Well done, an interesting read. I hope this is just the start of a lifetime in aviation.

    in reply to: Viewing at Tokyo #592007
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    When are you going? I’m rostered a NRT later this month…on the A346.

    EDIT – just seen in your sig that you aren’t going until Aug.

    in reply to: New BAe146 conversions – firefighter + freighter #592017
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Hmmm…on top of a fire…hmmm…seems like the 146 has found its natural home! 😉

    in reply to: Best Aero Engines #592028
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Further to the EPR thing –

    With both aircraft at MTOW the B752 and the A346 have similar power to weight ratios (I mention this purely to show that neither is underpowered). Today I have just flown a 346 in the cruise across the pond at FL370 and M.83 with the autothrust commanding a target EPR of 1.03. Now If I was in a 752 at FL370 doing its typical cruise speed of M.795 and set the EPR to 1.03 I’d be going down at a couple of thousand feet per minute!

    My assumption (which correlates nicely with RB211 operation but not with the Trent) had always been that an EPR of 1.0 represented an engine producing as much thrust as it is producing drag. More than 1.0 meant that thrust was winning the battle and less than 1.0 meant drag was the winner.

    Vortex, I spent a fair bit of time today looking further into the shaft protection thing in the books. Sensors monitor fan speed compared to LP shaft speed. If the fan speed is slower than the shaft speed then the fadecs read this as a sheared shaft and will auto-shutdown the engine. Unfortunately the system seems to be prone to sensor faults.

    (Edited to correct FL470 to FL370)

    in reply to: Best Aero Engines #594751
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    The ECAM purely displays the data sent from the engines. The data is not incorrect, it’s just that no one has yet been able to explain to me how an EPR of less than 1 doesn’t result in engine surge or stall. The shaft protection loss is purely an engine internal thing and I would imagine a greater worry in higher power derivatives as used in the A330 and the B777.

    in reply to: Water on hot brakes!? #594757
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    It reminds me of the MyTravel incident in Mahon a couple of seasons ago where the skipper went beyond the call of duty to try to resolve a problem with the nose gear air/ground logic switch and just got himself in a whole pile of do do as reported by the press. He tried to do right by his passengers but their lack of knowedge resulted in the fact that he’ll never try to help again. If in doubt, leave it to an engineer to take the blame (sorry Matthew)!

    in reply to: Best Aero Engines #594761
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Gawd, you never give it a rest do you? No I’m talking about the info that is displayed in the cockpit regardless of whether the engine is hung on an Airbus, a Boeing or a bleedin’ microlight!

    in reply to: Water on hot brakes!? #594884
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Tabloid field day!

    in reply to: Best Aero Engines #594890
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    OK…I have some difficulty understanding the logic behind the EPR presentation in the flightdeck. EPR is (simplified) a measure of the pressure between the back end and the front end of an engine. With the RB211 full chat at sea level gave a max EPR of approx 1.7 IIRC and flight idle was 1.0. With the Trent max EPR comes out at approx 1.2 but flight idle can have indications of around 0.8. I can’t see how a turbine engine can idle properly with a greater inlet pressure to outlet. 1.0 I can understand but less than 1 seems illogical.

    Also there are some issues with sensing for the system monitoring fan speed and N1 shaft speed. These are monitored and should be the same meaning that the fan has not separated from the shaft. There are known spurious faults with this system and this fault (occuring on 2 separate engines during one pushback) nearly got us stuck in HKG a while ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 3,331 total)