dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: crossing active runways #739146
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    They just use it to up the total number of movements they can achieve which I think is what you are effectively saying. Obviously there are limitations to it’s usage (primarily wind strength and direction). Sydney also uses it to spread the noise issue to reduce the effect on people living in the path of the main runway.

    in reply to: crossing active runways #754780
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    They just use it to up the total number of movements they can achieve which I think is what you are effectively saying. Obviously there are limitations to it’s usage (primarily wind strength and direction). Sydney also uses it to spread the noise issue to reduce the effect on people living in the path of the main runway.

    in reply to: What? #739697
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    I’m in LA at the mo so you’ll have to wait until I get home!

    in reply to: What? #755096
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    I’m in LA at the mo so you’ll have to wait until I get home!

    in reply to: crossing active runways #739788
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Yes but the BA 744 usually lands immediately after and they would then say the same thing about them!

    in reply to: crossing active runways #755124
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Yes but the BA 744 usually lands immediately after and they would then say the same thing about them!

    in reply to: What? #739790
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    About 14 years ago I operated on a 747-200 revenue flight from LGW to EWR with a FULL passenger load and a 5th pod. Somewhere in my archives I’ve got a photo from inside the cabin of the 3 engines on the left wing. I’ll see if I can find it and post it.

    in reply to: What? #755125
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    About 14 years ago I operated on a 747-200 revenue flight from LGW to EWR with a FULL passenger load and a 5th pod. Somewhere in my archives I’ve got a photo from inside the cabin of the 3 engines on the left wing. I’ll see if I can find it and post it.

    in reply to: The moment I've been waiting for…introducing…. #739793
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Well there’s definitely no criticising your determination! I remember hearing about this somewhere last year but I never realised it was you. I think it’s quite incredible that you have taken the bull by the horns and achieved this. Fantastic result.

    in reply to: The moment I've been waiting for…introducing…. #755127
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Well there’s definitely no criticising your determination! I remember hearing about this somewhere last year but I never realised it was you. I think it’s quite incredible that you have taken the bull by the horns and achieved this. Fantastic result.

    in reply to: 707 prototype – rolling… #739799
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    …Although im sure some of the airbus test pilots would like to have a go at rolling the A340, would be so much easier with fly by wire…

    It wouldn’t actually be possible under normal circumstances as the flight envelope protection system does not allow the aircraft to exceed 67 degrees angle of bank (or minus 15 to plus 25-30 degrees pitch depending on speed/angle of attack). However if you turned off some of the computers you could change the flight control laws from normal law to alternate law and then to direct law and now you’ve manually downgraded the handling to the same as an A300/310 or a Boeing. Now you’re rolling!

    in reply to: 707 prototype – rolling… #755138
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    …Although im sure some of the airbus test pilots would like to have a go at rolling the A340, would be so much easier with fly by wire…

    It wouldn’t actually be possible under normal circumstances as the flight envelope protection system does not allow the aircraft to exceed 67 degrees angle of bank (or minus 15 to plus 25-30 degrees pitch depending on speed/angle of attack). However if you turned off some of the computers you could change the flight control laws from normal law to alternate law and then to direct law and now you’ve manually downgraded the handling to the same as an A300/310 or a Boeing. Now you’re rolling!

    in reply to: crossing active runways #739804
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Very common in the States and also in Sydney. I’ve never heard it called Symops before, it’s referred to in the Jepp books as LAHSO (land and hold short operations). Even though the airfield might be using LAHSO when we arrive, we are not allowed to participate so it gets suspended for a few minutes until we land or depart. That’s the case for all UK airlines…it may be the case for any airline not from the country where it is occurring, I don’t know.

    in reply to: crossing active runways #755154
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Very common in the States and also in Sydney. I’ve never heard it called Symops before, it’s referred to in the Jepp books as LAHSO (land and hold short operations). Even though the airfield might be using LAHSO when we arrive, we are not allowed to participate so it gets suspended for a few minutes until we land or depart. That’s the case for all UK airlines…it may be the case for any airline not from the country where it is occurring, I don’t know.

    in reply to: What's wrong with this picture??? #742249
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Well done WD. IIRC didn’t you have a command on the B1900 before?

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 3,331 total)