Remove wingtip, inspection of a few key areas (metal structures tend to transfer loads to other areas) and back in service with one winglet missing very quickly. Dispatch in accordance with the MEL with a very minor performance penalty but no big deal really.
…The actual distance from the cockpit to the tip of the winglet on an A340 is 50m, add to this the optical diffraction caused by the side window when looking rearwards and especially at night. The A340 is a pig to manoeuvre around obstacles due to it being almost impossible to judge the exact position of the wing tip. It is human nature to steer clear of an obstacle but with the A340 and it’s outward sloping winglet and swept wing you end up with wing “growth” when turning away. Thus the A340 has caught many a pilot with wing creep!…
…and there was me thinking the A340-300 and 600 were much easier to taxi as it is one of the few where you actually can see the wingtips! Who do you fly the A340 for Mpacha?
Great stuff Deano. Makes some great reading. You’ve got to admit it’s way more fun than CPL and IR training as now this is specific stuff you are actually going to use.
Below is a picture showing a set of manuals for the A320 on the left compared to the equivalent set of manuals for the B737.
I’m surprised to see that the press managed to avoid making some comment about the brave pilot desperately trying to steer the aircraft away from a school.
Very dissappointed with the idiocy of the BBC’s coverage of this event. It really was a big load of nothing and it would be very unfair if any passenger assosciated BA with any lack of safety issue. Also, when are the press ever going to get to grips with the fact that 99.9% of taxying takes place on taxiways, runways are for take off and landing!
Only just seen this thread. Great news, well done Dean. I know there’s a part of you that might be thinking I wish it was a jet but I really, really think that the 2 years I did on turboprops were the best bit of learning I did. Not only that, it is by a mile the best turboprop in existence. Anyone that has never flown a commercial aircraft with propellers has no idea of what icing really is. You’ll find bigger aircraft easy after the turboprops. A bit of time in this aircraft and you will be in a prime position to hop to the bigger carriers. Great stuff.
If I’m positioning on a 744 I always try to get a seat on the main deck rather than upstairs. It’s also much more restrictive upstairs as its effectively a narrowbody parked on top of a widebody.
Mark – the upstairs is still a fair bit quieter than being right down the back due to the fact that the rear is much closer to the jet efflux.
But Steve, you’re old enough and wise enough to know when you’re doing the equivalent of making pork jokes in a synagogue so I guess it’s kind of surprising to see you doing that here.
To all you guys who even think there is any kind of issue here:
Bloke A (heterosexual) goes to work in his factory, etc Monday to Friday and saves for ages to have a holiday away from the UK once or twice a year where he pays through the nose for the privelege.
Bloke B (also heterosexual) work IS the holiday (albeit with a fair amount of hard work to get to that position and to get to that destination) but now he is being paid to be there in the company of many other young, attractive people (if that is his/her thing).
The cabin crew scene is littered with straight guys who you’d think would never do this job who initially took loads of stick from their mates when they joined. The interesting thing is that it never takes long before the guys who get left at home realise that their mate actually got it right.
…shame LHR-PVG is not on a 747 because he could of got a seat on the upper-deck, which is quieter…
!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is an urban myth. The upper deck of 100(SUD), 300 and 400 747’s experience a standing shockwave immediately above them making it a noisier environment than the front of the main cabin.
Wow, nearly 300kg of static thrust. That’s very impressive.
OK I was trying to avoid this one but…
It’s none of my employers business, my house is paid off and my wife is considerably more well off than me!
My engine is a 175cc single cylinder ‘Black Devil’ 2 stroke engine driving a 2 bladed 115cm diameter wooden prop. It produces 21hp and gives a static thrust of 62kg. Bearing in mind with enough fuel for an hours flight (I can legally carry enough fuel for just under 3 hours) my all up weight is 120kg I have a power to weight ratio of just over a half. Out of interest the 4 RR Trents on the Airbus produce a maximum of 103,636kg of thrust and a max take off weight of 380,000kg. This gives a power to weight ratio of 0.27. The 757 I used to fly has a power to weight ratio of 0.34 and yet this is considered one of the highest performing airliners. Can anyone give any equivalents for common GA types?
Other than buying the kit my only costs are fuel (about 3.5 litres per hour) and oil. Insurance is not required but can be had for 100 quid a year. If you are a member of the BHPA then you get it automatically with your membership if you bother to do their powered paraglider conversion. Most people don’t bother.
WB – the paramotor lets you be airborne with much more feeling for what’s around you. An airframe tends to desensitise you from the rest of the world. I originally started to be aware of this through the open cockpit flying I used to regularly do. Now I get that feeling to the max!
It is purely done to facilitate stowage in the wells and the retraction sequence. If you look at the A340-600 you’ll see that the main gears tilt a different way to the centre gear. This is to allow the mainwheels to clear the center bogey during the retraction.
You know how if you leave your mobile phone near a speaker you will frequently get a signal hunting noise emitting from the speaker…well that comes through our headsets if a mobile phone is in use. I’ve never experienced navigational problems but it’s irritating having the headset noise when you’re trying to decipher Russian (etc) ATC.
Just drove back home from a flight at 5pm and it’s gone.
AFAIK Air New Zealand’s primary route to/from the UK has been via LA for years.