Mike, are you thinking of the Luton Major?
I respect your view Mike…if we all wanted the same thing then life would be very dull indeed!
To be honest no…but then I’ve done so much thinking in my head that I didn’t expect anyone to be able to profer anything new. I was more interested in seeing which side people would come down on and also thought it would provide subject for a very different thread from the usual.
As several people have said, there really is no duff choice with Virgin so therefore I have to base my opinion largely on the lifestyle issue.
Well here we go, I’ve decided to fly the…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
A340
My reasons are:
1) Much as I love the 747 it is old technology compared to the bus. I want to move with the times and I need to adapt.
2) In long haul flying you use the controls for 1% of the time so why have a great big control column in the way for the remaining 99%?
3) Virgins route structure gives the A340 fleet a much more varied and interesting selection or routes.
4) As Virgins A340’s tend to do longer sectors than the 747 I will average working 3 times a month as opposed to 4.
5) Nearly all my flights will be from Heathrow (not far from home) whereas the 747 does half its flights from Gatwick.
6) If it all goes pear shaped or I choose to leave long haul I have a rating that can get me into most decent airlines. There isn’t much opportunity to work in the UK on a 747 ticket.
7) There is a good chance I could get to fly the A380 in the near future. 😀
8) The average age of the A340 flightcrew in Virgin is lower than that of the 747.
9) By flying an Airbus type I feel I will be better qualified to offer an opinion on which manufacturer makes the better product. The majority of pilots who criticise Airbus have never flown one. Those who have tend to swear by them.
10) My wife is concerned about operations to the US due to increased risk of terrorist attack. The Airbus fleet does less trips to the US.
11) I adore South Africa! This is almost solely served by the A340.
The funny thing is that there is only really one significant point that really draws me to the 747. When my kids are in the school playground and they tell their friends that daddy is a long haul pilot, every kid knows what a Jumbo is but no one really knows an A340! That sounds really stupid!
Crews already teained are currently being retained. Crews in training and waiting to start are being laid off. 757 operation will not now happen. All ops staff have been laid off. 767 will continue to operate for the short term. Good luck to all but the future is not looking good.
arse.
Yes that really does show how far we have already come environmentally.
I see what you mean about early gear retraction. Bearing in mind that for the gear to be already going up that lever must have moved a while ago. The body angle also looks relatively low. My mob expect a positive rate of climb, increasing altimeter AND 20 feet rad alt before calling for gear up.
At last 4 engined aeroplanes have been made to comply with fire protection, etc, but it took the introduction of long haul twins to make that happen.
Very, very interesting to see how you all perceive this. I had a good long distance chat on the phone with Skycruiser today and it’s interesting to see how the differences between Virgin and Cathay would have made me come to a completely different decision if Cathay were my employers.
I will post my answer tomorrow with a full breakdown of the reasons.
Galdri – it’s been years since I had any serious involvement in training but I have an inkling that there might be something in what you say if you are the owner of the aircraft receiving instruction in it. Perhaps I’m talking nonsense?
what he said :rolleyes:
Interesting subject Tim. Interestingly, I find that by far the best pilots are NOT the grey or no hair pilots. I would much prefer to be flown by guys who were brought up with new fangled technology rather than guys that still can’t work their own VCR’s!
I don’t have a problem with ETOPS provided it is done on an aircraft that was designed for it from the outset rather than ‘adjusted’ in order to meet the minimum criteria.
My brother flies behind a pair of CFM’s on an aircraft with no FADEC or even EEC (this means it is possiblt to overboost the engines). He asked a CFM engineer how long a CFM would last in an overboost situation. The engineer said that they overboosted a CFM and after 56 continuous hours got fed up with waiting for something to happen so they gave up!!!
Seriously bad news. I can see my 2010 roster – 0600 start to go LHR-Sydney-LHR twice, 6 days on 3 days off. No thanks, subsonic and nightstops will do me fine.
The Swissair MD11 crash has made us all rightly sh1t scared of smoke on board. Top marks to the crew.
Well if it turned out that there was something unidentified on one of my flights I’d stick it on the deck asap too. Current climate dictates a take no risks policy.
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Wellwell, is the 742 certified flying into Newcastle… I assume not at MTOW, because then it needs more than 3000 meters!
It’s not a case of certification but whether the aircraft can meet criteria such as performance, available fire category, surface load bearing, etc.
As Preston says, there’s no reason why a 747 couldn’t operate with a heavy payload out of there as long as the fuel load was light.