Scott Crossfield and Mary Anne Thompson (Air Force Association Education Fund). This photo was taken Monday afternoon at the Prattville, AL, airport just after he’d landed. He had come down to Maxwell AFB to speak to the new 2nd Lts. on Tuesday. He took off Wednesday morning to go home.
I was suprised at Yeagers response on hearing about Crossfields death.He said he wasn’t suprised as Crossfield was the kind of pilot that took risks. Asked what sort of risks, he said flying in weather that he (Yeager) wouldn’t have gone up in.
Whatever, he certainly had the right stuff and died what he loved doing.
Can you provide a link to Yeagers response?
I think some sort of blue/grey digital pattern would look pretty cool, although I would imagine painting an aircraft like that would be an terribly tedious job
Good point.
It would seem that the jet tanker would come close to stalling if it tried to match the helicopters low speed.
…Should he have still been flying at that age??
Sure. I don’t see a problem with someone flying at age 85 or even beyond that. As long as they can pass their physical, are not suffering from dementia and are able to meet all the required criteria, why not?
I’ll bet Chuck Yeager still flies.
…Should he have still been flying at that age??
Sure. I don’t see a problem with someone flying at age 85 or even beyond that. As long as they can pass their physical, are not suffering from dementia and are able to meet all the required criteria, why not?
I’ll bet Chuck Yeager still flies.
Cool lil’ carrier.
Too bad nobody wants one 🙁
Why weren’t all these US/UK technology transfer wrinkles ironed out BEFORE BAE committed to the JSF project? :confused:
Actually, I was wondering why the ESA didn’t launch their own satellite using one of their Ariane 5 boosters. Why rely on some old Soviet-era ICBM cobbled together for commercial use when they’re perfectly capable of putting a satellite into orbit themselves?
Here’s a three-engined fighter: :p
The ROV that untangled the minisub is American. The ROV operators are American as well. How do I know? My former boss, who I still see and talk to, worked on the ROV and people he knows were the crew that operated it in this rescue mission.
Your post contradicts every news report I’ve seen so far.
Dude, no offense, but I think I’ll go with what the press is reporting rather than what you heard from some friend of a friend who knows some guy that was part of the crew that operated the submersible. :p
Kudos to the Royal Navy! 🙂
I just heard on the radio that the British “Scorpio” remotely operated submersible had cut the cables that were pinning the Russian submarine to the seabed and that resurfacing was expected to take place “soon.” Hopefully the crew is still alive.
The Yak-25 is EXTREMELY boring..jpg)
Just looking at it causes me to yawn.
As I have said before, I would like to see a class of six 25,000t+ carriers…
I believe this 6 carrier class would be a far better long term solution to the UKs needs.
I agree. A half a dozen carriers similar to the proposed SAC-220 would’ve been the way to go.
This is all I could find. Don’t know how reliable the source is:
Yasen is the NATO designation of it, Project 885 the Russian one, and Severeodvinsk the name of the one being built (AKA K329)
Displacement, tons: 5,900 surfaced; 8,600 dived
Dimensions, meters: (111x12x8.4)
Main machinery: Nuclear; 1 PWR; 195 MW; 2 GT3A turbines; 43,000 hp; 1 shaft; pump-jet propulsor; 2 spinners
Speed, knots: 28 dived, 17 surfaced
Complement: 80 (30 officers)
Missiles: Novator Alfa SS-N-27 (note: other sources say Yakhont SS-N-26). 8 VLS launchers in after casing. Total of 24 missiles.
A/S: SS-N-15. Fired from torpedo tubes.
Torpedoes: 8 533mm tubes. Inclined outwards. Total of about 30 weapons.
Countermeasures: ESM: Radar warning
Radars: Surface search, i-band
Sonars: Irtysh Amfora system includes bow-mounted spherical array; passive/attack search and attack; low frequency. Flank and towed arrays; passive; very low frequency.
Programmes: Malakhit design. Confirmed building in 1993. Reported plans were for seven of the class to replace the Victor III class. It was initially thought that these were multipurpose SSNs derived from the Akula II class, but the length of the program suggests there has been considerable scope for technical upgrade.
Structure: Some of the given details are speculative. VLS launchers for SSMs, canted torpedo tubes, and spherical bow sonars are all new to Russian designs.