a small correction
IAF and IDFAF to exchange pilots
Author: idrw team | 18 October 2007 | Views: 271BY : AJAY FOR IDRW.ORGhttp://www.idrw.org/2007/10/18/iaf_and_idfaf_to_exchange_pilots.html
“Tayeset” is Hebrew for “squadron”, not a specific unit
chaff & Flare
That is my design.
I have designed & installed the prototype on an Indian Mig-23BN, and later done prototype & serial installation on Ethiopean Mig-23BN + Mig-21 Bis.
I had pictures of the Ethiopean ’23 from their Air Force callendar, but never seen the Indian installation, which is now on their Mig-27s.
Now if anyone could find me pictures of Ethiopean Mig-21 with this installation, that would be nice
Thank you very much googeler
Exactly what I was looking for and could not find, and here is the reason
Su-22 found
That was a nice game and I also learned something about that roacket test center.
Here it is
Rafale and other airplanes
Can anyone recall any fighter program that has been on time and on budjet?
Is the F-22 not dragging along for ages?
This is only natural in such tremendously complex projects, especially when you cannot sell a fighter project to any government if you tell the truth about the time and cost at thr beginning.
I think all of you miss the most important point:
Rafale is a beautiful airplane, a true heir to the Mirage III
The Typhoon is so ugly, it is like a camel – a horse designed by a commity… 🙂
how can a small bird make a big hole?
the answer is simple. If it flies very fast, it has a lot of kinetic energy, and that’s doing the dammage.
normally tests are made with a 4 lb bird at 300 knots
I assume that only large birds fly so high, so the energy is pretty high
.
.
.
.
.
off course it is the airplane that is fast, not the bird, but the relative speed matters
how can a small bird make a big hole?
the answer is simple. If it flies very fast, it has a lot of kinetic energy, and that’s doing the dammage.
normally tests are made with a 4 lb bird at 300 knots
I assume that only large birds fly so high, so the energy is pretty high
.
.
.
.
.
off course it is the airplane that is fast, not the bird, but the relative speed matters
to puffadder
Just to remind you that the Radar on the Mirage was totally useless, so Israel did not have an all weather supersonic interceptor until the Phantom.
Also its Matra missile had only one kill as far as I know, meaning it was not a big success either.
You might say that the Mirage was a great day fighter, but it was not until the Kfir that its attack potential has been fulfilled.
Also I think that one problem with BVR missiles in Vietnam was getting permission to use them without visual identification. Am I right or did they have poor performance?
One thing for sure – although I have never considered the Phantom ugly, as many say, the Mirage is certainly one of the most beautiful planes ever made
Hughes H-1
Turbo NZ- you are absolutely right!!!
I was lucky to see it (this is the replica) onky day before it crashed. The pictures barely describe its perfection of workmanship. It was difficult to see the seams between skin panels, and we are talking about bare metal here. It was a flying mirror.
What a pity is gone forever
Hi Mike
Yhose are beautiful pictures
I liked especially the Comet cockpit shots. Being involved in cockpit design for modern jets, it is amazing to see the granddaddy of them all. How on earth did the pilots managed all those instruments. thrown all over the place.
The restoration is greate too.
Keep Shooting
My contribution
VAUTOUR – the Jet Mosquito!!
what happened to my yesterday’s reply????
EAA annual art competition
Paul – your paintings are excellent. Do you know about the annual EAA art competition, held each year at Oshkosh? I think your work is on a level that can compete successfully.
In 2003 they held a show of many paintings by James Dietz, and the artist himself was there to tel about his work methods. It was fascinating.
That is another reason for you all to visit Oshkosh Airventure. There are also many many prints of great paintings to buy.
I attach 2 paintings by James Dietz, for those who are not familliar with him. They are smal and do not do justice to him, but that’s what I have right now.
They are really 2 events at the same day, sort of “before and after”. the originals are stunning.
check here
http://www.jamesdietz.com/gallery/merchant.ihtml?id=6&step=2
Me and (my) airplane
First of all it’s amazing to see so many people in this forum. I have not realized there were so many.
Here is a picture of my son and me, in front of the #1 G-150, 3 days after a fanastic rollout ceremony (yes, same day as the A-380).
I don’t own it, I have not flown in it, but I helped design it, so go out an buy one!
Funhouse – you sure have a lot of fun in your house!
Your work is fantastic for a non-flying replica.
Suggestions: are you a member of EAA? I am sure they could help you, and more important – you could help others to build flying airplanes, and maybe build your own. you certainly have the two required qualities – talent and perseverance.
Another advice: There are people in the UK building flying Spitfires. I don’t have an address but I am sure it can be found. They may have information you need
Keep up the good work, can’t wait to see the completed cockpit