dark light

jogger321

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Positive changes ahead at Brooklands #897484
    jogger321
    Participant

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmakSwlYLs0

    Worth watching all the way through if you have not seen it before 😀

    in reply to: No more Vulcan runs at Wellesbourne? #871581
    jogger321
    Participant

    Won’t fly. Runway to short to take off. Has been said enough times at their events. 655 is Owned by the family that own airfield, they have already said (last year) it will be scrapped. I am not been negative just repeating what is already out there

    Your source please about the Littler family saying the Vulcan will be scrapped?

    The Vulcan is currently stored on one of the “pans” used by the Wellington’s

    One the other side of the road to the touchdown cafe is another part of the old airfield (not part of it for many years). There is another disused pan still there that could be a possibility to put the Vulcan albeit as a static

    in reply to: North Weald's DC-4s -What is going on ?? #852912
    jogger321
    Participant

    Adam West ! Your input and recent purchase has raised a new hope for 2015 that I rather thought was not going to happen ! Thank you !

    Keith 🙂

    Nice to see the Caped Crusader come to the rescue!

    in reply to: Phantom production numbers #1108487
    jogger321
    Participant

    Is there anywhere in the uk in the foreseeable future that it may be possible to see one fly?

    in reply to: London Gatwick name change #543161
    jogger321
    Participant

    On your bags it will still have “LGW” anyone know what that stands for?

    in reply to: Concorde at Le Bourget, #1124552
    jogger321
    Participant
    in reply to: Beech Restorations Brunters #1130072
    jogger321
    Participant

    Whilst the vast majority of folk attending these sort of events are only too delighted that we are allowed to get up so close to these exhibits unfortunately you get the odd one or two that have no comprehension of respecting other peoples property.. Maybe a little fencing around it next year?

    in reply to: Concorde engines being examined! #1134664
    jogger321
    Participant

    The Heathrow one..forget it!. Any airframe that has been outside for 8 years of this complexity will never fly again.

    The only reason XH558 Vulcan was able to fly again was because it was shoved in a Hanger immediately after its delivery flight to Bruntingthorpe

    in reply to: RAF Stratford Upon Avon #1134949
    jogger321
    Participant

    Raf Atherstone On Stour

    in reply to: Extreme mountain glider flight video link #426404
    jogger321
    Participant

    I’m no pilot but was that variometer just showing a constant 6 – 8 down all the time.. Didn’t see any evidence of lift.

    in reply to: RAF Waddington International Airshow #1191186
    jogger321
    Participant

    There was a time, not so long ago, when the powers-that-be felt that we, the UK citizens, had a right to take a look at OUR forces, which WE had paid for, and there was some obligation and pride to put on a good show.

    That impetus seems to be lost, and it is disgraceful that the premier Royal Air Force event can field such a thin showing of front line aircraft.

    With some initiative and committment they could perhaps get some QFI’s from the Typhoon conversion unit to work up a 3-ship display, which would be very noisy and spectacular, and would at least show that someone was making an effort to entertain and impress.

    Meanwhile, you are a para pinned down by insurgent gunfire is some god forsaken place in Afghanistan & radio for an air strike to remove them..It’s going to be a while comes back the answer as we are a bit low on resources as some planes have been diverted to Air Show Duty this weekend.

    in reply to: Lightning XR770 Waddington #1191224
    jogger321
    Participant

    Originally Posted by finchyboy View Post
    I for one think to your attitude is very aprupt rude and confrontational and really think you owe 320 an apology and quite frankly it doesn’t surprise me that you are short on manpower. Maybe it’s time to address the way you speak to people and your attitude ?:

    Blimey these forums do have a load of “keyboard jockeys” don’t they. From what I can see this lady actually has got off her backside (instead of spending too much time on forums like these ) , and actually taken a plane in pretty poor condition and making it happen thats its been turned into something that looks magnificent and given the visiting public to Waddington a great amount of pleasure…Well Done!

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1191966
    jogger321
    Participant

    Few things are certain in life, a myriad of events can produce cancellations. Unless you can prove that a deliberate attempt that fraud, deception was intended then you have to live with it. Every event I can think of has a disclaimer, musicians, performers get ill, car accidents happen, someone breaks a wrist or damages tendons doing jobs round the house.

    And when mechanical devices are involved it is even harder to predict what can happen.As for paperwork and targets , well its always been a tricky area,
    ask anyone in industry.

    A little less raging and more appreciation of what is actually achieved could go down well with those who give up a lot of time.

    I agree and rarely post in this thread because of all the “armchair experts” normally spouting such negativity and death wishes for the project

    HOWEVER

    I’m a project manager in real life and have to construct project plans for a living. People that are involved in this line of work will know what I mean by “milestones” and “dependencies”

    Clearly a key dependency on XH558 appearing this weekend was to have a fresh shiny VALID permit to fly safely locked away in a filing cabinet..No permit to fly no show, simple.

    If this was in any doubt the project team had ample opportunity to notify the thousands that travelled specifically to see her.. If it was going to be a close run thing again this could have been communicated and folk could make their own judgement call.

    A non appearance by a non serviceable aircraft is a different matter altogether.

    in reply to: gazelle tail boom recovered #1176888
    jogger321
    Participant

    Absolutely delighted to hear you got it back…

    Any chance you could fill us in on any plans on reopening the museum at all to the public ?…I’m sure you will agree surely things cannot stay as they are for ever?

    in reply to: Long Marston Canberra To Move #1193560
    jogger321
    Participant

    Good to hear…Any deals to get ANY of the aircraft remaining out of Long Marston before they are scrapped has got to be a good thing…They all look totally abandoned and ita a total disgrace what has happened there.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)