I do not believe it is a very good idea to develop such an aircraft for the homemarket only and I am not sure if Japan is able and willing to export this plane. For the price of the development and the production of such a plane you get a very large fleet of modern fighter jets inkl. AWACS, Tankers – etc. (the whole network, which is necessary). Japans fighter-development-partner Lockheed Martin will not be allowed to share the secrets of the Raptor. Cost problems coud lead to a stealth-plane-look-alike or it could lead to a quite stealthy plane without state of the art sensors, defensive system etc.
I would only make further steps after setting up a partnership with other nations.
You should not only compare the performance in WVR and BVR combat – the big question is: is the plane ready when you need it -> reliability. Without a support network that keeps the planes flying during a more than some days lasting conflict it doesn’t matter which aircraft is superior. Another important issure is the ability to fight in a network.
In terms of reliability and networking cabability I see advantages of the Eurocanards compared to the Suchois.
I wonder why there is so much competition between the Rafale and the Eurofighter side. Both are very capable fighters. But despite Dassault has an advantage in the design, production and evolution procedures (because it has not to manage a large partner-network) it seams to me, the Rafale is not a big competition on the world market for high priced fighters for the Eurofighter. So the market has already taken a decission.
Personally I hope both types will get a fair share at the world market – thats good for the future of european aerospace industry and for all european countries that are running one of these aircraft.
Austria has bought the Eurofighter but I would be even proud, if we had choosen the Rafale.
24/7 is NOT possible for more than – lets say 5 or 6 weeks. After that period all EFs are in maintenance.
The Austrian air defense concept for summits etc. already include armed Saab 105 Jettrainer, armed PC-7 and armed OH-58 or S-70 helicopters. All proved very well for different types of intruders – from Jets to balloons. In many exercises and also during our EU presidency 2006 and the Bush visit in 2006 it proved to be a perfect system (in combination with the Goldhaube air surveillance system and anti-air guns and missiles).
15 single seater Tranche I Block 5 (last Block of Tranche I).
It is not about saving money – it is about telling the Austrians that you (MoD Darabos) have saved money for buying the unpopular aircraft, which were ordered by the former government – after you have promised to chancel the deal before elections. No one is asking for the cost of future upgrades, shorter life cycle, earlier replacement, etc..
a fleet of 15 seems to me small enough for this thread: Austrian Eurofighter

First one arrived on July 12th. The Typhoons will replace the leased F-5E Tiger II (which replaced the Saab Draken) in the role as interceptors.
More: http://www.bmlv.at/download_archiv/photos/flieger/galerie.php?id=1141&currRubrik=55
english infos and pics: http://www.doppeladler.com/oebh/luftfahrzeuge/eurofighter.htm
Pictures of and english infos on Austrias Eurofighters:
http://www.doppeladler.com/oebh/luftfahrzeuge/eurofighter.htm
The original plan was to use 24 planes on two different air bases (Zeltweg+Linz). Experiences showed that at any given time about 1/3 of the fleet is in maintenence -> 16 left.
To give every necessary pilot the chance for his annual flight ours you need another 1/3 of the fleet for training -> 8 left.
Austrias QRA system was: 2 QRA planes + 1 spare plane. Another 3 planes standing by. 2 planes left for improving air surveillance during high priority times (eg. EU summit).
The adopted plan was to use 18 planes on one air base.
1/3 maintenance -> 12
1/3 training -> 6
2x QRA formations. In high priority times the training must wait.
Now, with 15 planes on one air base there must be another system
1/3 maintenance -> 10
Training partly abroad? No spare planes? We will see.