A400 MPA
How about scrapping the MRA4 and equipping the A400M with the MRA4’s avionics. A portion of the A400M fleet can serve either as transports or MPA. Supplement these aircraft with a purchase of Global Hawks.
Hey, what happens when all this stuff becomes “self-aware”, just like in the Terminator films!? 😀
If a country wants to use an UCAV to replace the manned fighter for the jobs of air-superiority completely, it must be dare to let it have “self-aware” and the right of deciding firing weapons on its own at first.
Controlling hundreds of UCAVs from the ground stations several hundreds, or even thousands, of miles away with the help of satellite datalink is simply too risky ~ Image what will happen if your enemy is advancing enough that it can interfere / block your datalink (with the help of advanced EWS or EMP weapons), or destroy your satellites for datalink, or just take out your ground stations at the beginning of war ??
Agree with Toan that we can battle UCAVs by attacking their electronics and datalinks. e.g Detonate low yield nuclear weapon in space to generate EMP pulse. Attack satellites with ASAT missiles. Use of IR, EW jammers or EMP weapons. However, UCAVs are likely to have hardened electronics and reversion to backup mission plan when comms is lost.
It is probably a good idea to have humans in the loop with re-fueling and re-armament to prevent the Terminator scenario 🙂 and no nuclear weapons on UCAVs 🙂
Future UCAV
Imagine a future UCAV that dogfights with millimeter wave radar and IR sensors and fights in a swarm that shares radar information. Such a swarm would know the air density, 3D-position of an enemy aircraft including the position of its flight control surfaces, thrust settings or use of thrust vectoring and can estimate its likely energy state based on thrust settings, flight control surfaces and rate of change in direction.
The swarm can work in a 3D-space to maneuver their adversary into a poor position. Each member of the swarm knows the other’s energy state and it is only a matter of algorithms making them fight as a team. They might even achieve soft-kill by maneuvering the adversary into the ground. They can vote which aircraft in the swarm should release weapons based on kill probability and position. They can minimise ordnance expenditure. They can fight in concert with SAMs and even vote for the SAM to release weapons. The UCAVs can pull 12-14G continously.
These UCAVS will be integrated with SAMs, AWACs, radars like Green Pine. The battlespace will appear to AirForce personnel as an integrated digital battlespace where resources need to be allocated or increased. The flight hours and state of each UCAV is datalinked. Computers help manage and plan coverage maintaining a 24 hours persistence over the battlespace.
TRDI ATD-X
ATD-X scale flight test model shown by the Japanese MoD.
It has alot more composites including a composite wingbox. Only the rear structure is not composite. It also has a re-designed FBW system.
“Yes its not conventional looking but its really quite sleek aerodynamically and it is very well packaged.”
Is that a joke:confused:
Could you show me the sleekness pls.
The flying barrel is more like it, a fat barrel too.:D
Imagine a large lightweight one piece delta wing with a large diameter turbofan hanging below it. The bays are alongside the engine. The engine’s CG is in a very good location. I think its weapons bays are in a good location CG wise too. The wing/engine/weapons bays package leads to a lightweight structure.
The engine has a very short duct that is structurally lightweight and efficient. This leads to a large chin inlet which is necessary because it is a single inlet and needs to feed a 50,000lb thrust engine. This inlet gives it the guppy look unfortunately.
The aircraft has a low frontal cross section and an aerodynamically beautiful wing. Its all wing and engine IMHO. Its large turbofan and short length makes it look tubby but the aircraft is very good aerodynamically IMHO. 🙂
This picture shows the aircraft’s low frontal cross section and amazing packaging.
Look at that beautiful wing

Great location for weapons bays and engine structurally/CG wise and CG is important for aerodynamics too. The mid-mounted location for the engines allow for lower cost and simpler structure for stealthy tailpipes and also allows for thrust vectoring during flight compared to F-35. The wing is a thing of beauty compared to the F35’s wing.
Did I convince you? 🙂
The F-35 is a better aircraft for the STOVL requirement because of its lift-fan resulting in a higher total output for lift. I wish Boeing would bring the X-32 CTOL variant to market with company funds.
And a demonstrator. While somewhat combat capable, unlike the X-35, its a long way from becoming an F-32.
Yes its not conventional looking but its really quite sleek aerodynamically and it is very well packaged. The ANG doesn’t need a STOVL aircraft. The F-32 should climb like a rocketship with the F135 and its big delta wing and it should be more affordable than the F35 with simpler packaging and SH Block II avionics.
How about Boeing X-32 with Super Hornet Block II avionics?
Thanks for the video. Here’s part 1 & 3 to the video.
I think they’re courageous men called upon by their political leaders to fight and war is the same for both sides when you have to see friends fall in battle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcGhkR52hog Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiRUyw6PXeQ Part 3
Lockheed proposed an aircraft like this for the Block 60 F16 but it was rejected by the UAE.
Royal Navy Boeing 787 Silent X
* 2x Rotary internal bay for JDRADM, SDB, Storm Shadow, ADM-160 MALD, ALARM missile
* Solid state laser (defense against SAM or AAM)
* Sentinel R1’s SAR radar
* Sentinel R1’s DASS system
* Thales Spectra/BAE Systems DEWS
* Ejection seats
* 3 sets of crews on rotation
* Onboard Galley, Bunks and toilets for persistence over the battlefield 😀
* Onboard entertainment with on-demand video, broadband internet
Purchase 120 aircraft and cancel the carriers 😀 Just joking. Hope you guys like it.
Naval LCA
Does anyone know the date for the Naval LCA’s first flight?
MadRat, Rolls Royce isn’t European 😀
How about replacing the Harriers and Tornados with an interim purchase of Super Hornets. Then supplement/replace the Super Hornets with the F/A-XX or NGAD that Boeing is proposing?
The research to do many of those things has already been done, and certainly its aerodynamics in various configurations have been extensively studied and tested. The F-15 was used in all sorts of TVC, canard, tailless, etc, trials, e.g. F-15 STOL/MTD, F-15 VISTA, F-15 MANX, etc. Granted there would still be plenty of work to do for weapons carriage, launch envelopes, etc, but it’s not as daunting as starting from scratch.
Thanks! I didn’t know about the F15 MANX. I’d like to see Boeing develop the concept.
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1996/11/20/10062/mdc-pushes-tailless-f-15.html
