Air and space combat is ever evolving. If an adversary has AWACs or datalinks, anti AWACs missiles, electronic warfare, tactics etc will be developed to negate that advantage.
The same thing will happen with satelite datalinks or space based sensors. The USAF is developing the Boeing YAL-1 which can intercept ASAT weapons and be used against low earth orbit satellites as well.
Cost of space access might change due to reusable orbital vehicles. There are stealthy low observable satellites that can maneuver or deploy countermeasures. Future warfare might involve low cost satellite launches in the event of war just to increase capacity, capability and provide decoys. Multiple low cost sats and terrestrial sensors might operate in a mesh to prevent single point failure.
I think UCAV/UCAS will play to their advantages. Un-manned, low cost, high endurance, stealthy. e.g. the X-37, X-41, Falcon HTV are unmanned systems which do not have to be man-rated which leads to much lower cost.
A UCAV/UCAS might not need to have the same kinematic performance, supercruise, super maneuverability or be multirole like a 5G fighter. They might operate like stealthy non-emitting aerial “SAM” ISR platforms flying racetrack patterns and using swarm combat. An aircraft in the killzone of an AIM-120D, AIM-9X is the same whether it is a 5G fighter or UCAS.
Sign In
