dark light

mantog

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 313 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1096464
    mantog
    Participant

    He is trying to imply that some of the pitting is due to the casting, so he has clearly never seen a decent one, plus it is forged, not cast. Finally, I know at least one other person who has one in the living room so that is b——s as well!
    Maybe it is just me, but I can`t see the relevance of mounting this crankshaft on part of a Pegasus, surely there is something more WW2 that he could have used? To me the two components have no connection at all? Wouldn`t a nicely made wooden stand have worked better?

    Rant over 🙂

    Pete

    My guess is that no-one else has a Merlin crankshaft mounted on Pegasus stage, that’s what makes it unique. IMHO, a wooden stand wouldn’t look right. He could’ve used a plain metal base…but why not use something with an aeronautical connection! Lol, I don’t know, maybe he’s making a bold statement about the paradox of old technology standing above new, or perhaps a tribute to Sir Stanley Hooker?! 😉

    in reply to: Amazing CGI – Battle of the Coral Sea #1098023
    mantog
    Participant

    Fantastic stuff!

    Here’s an interesting video of Japanese Fighter pilots in BoB 😮

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyNqOZqDl_w&feature=related

    in reply to: SR-71, KG-200 & Red Eagles books. #1100501
    mantog
    Participant

    Nope, but I’ve got a bottle of Bushmills, that’ll do me 😉

    in reply to: B o B film — by a flight sim #1101085
    mantog
    Participant

    Bloody brilliant!

    in reply to: Any chance of a restored "Thud" flying ? #1166421
    mantog
    Participant

    Have we missed the clue in the title….?
    These aircraft were called ‘Thuds’ because that was the sound they so often made when they met the earth… usually nose first….. i think just about 400 of the 833 ‘Thuds’ built, landed in this way:diablo:

    Aye but presumably, if they got one on the airshow circuit it wouldn’t be facing AAA and SAMs? I thought the loss rate was so high because of enemy action, not accidents?

    in reply to: RIAT 2009 #1173662
    mantog
    Participant

    Security at RIAT

    I was there on the Sunday, it was a pretty good show I think, the RN balbo one of most impressive things I’ve seen since massed helicopter approach at Middle Wallop in 89. Vulcan put on a much better routine than when I saw it on it’s debut display at Waddington as well.

    What amused me was the whole security thing on way in. I saw the notice on entrance, ‘anyone found carrying….” insert long list of stuff, including lock knives…”will not be let in”. I was gutted, because I remembered I’d left my Leatherman in it’s case on my belt ( I always carry one, just about the most useful thing I own apart from my Johnson). So the guy runs his metal detector all over me, keeps beeping around my waist until I lift up my shirt (with an air of resignation) and show him Leatherman case on my belt. He didn’t even bother to look inside it..just waved me on…if he had he’d’ve seen it has 2 lock-blades, a diamond tipped saw, a thing for getting stones out of horses hooves and lord knows what else. Meanwhile my friend was getting a grilling from security over the bag containing a beach shelter, I don’t think they’d ever seen one before and assumed the tiny metal tips on the glass-fibre polls were deadly weapons.

    in reply to: Potez 63 #1216062
    mantog
    Participant

    Superb!

    in reply to: Help needed to identify Blenheim part #1218220
    mantog
    Participant

    Smudge, thanks for your input!
    R.e the large piece, what you say does tie in…in the same area I’ve found a sear release (if u remember!) from an MG which presumably means it’s from a multi-gun arrangement, and some ammo (.303)
    I look forward to your further findings!

    in reply to: Help needed to identify Blenheim part #1219170
    mantog
    Participant

    No – one go any ideas? I was thinking that something that substantial had to be from engine mounting maybe? Or main bomb bay?

    in reply to: Help needed to identify Blenheim part #1220369
    mantog
    Participant

    How about this lump?!

    http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y276/thebobwalker/heavyduty.jpg

    in reply to: Help needed to identify Blenheim part #1220393
    mantog
    Participant

    Yup, looking at the diagrams I think it is indeed a bomb steady. Thanks guys!!

    in reply to: Help needed to identify Blenheim part #1220542
    mantog
    Participant

    Cpl more bits..

    First one is presumably a battery terminal of some sort?

    When I disassembled it, there was still grease on the parts as u can see in 2nd pic

    http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y276/thebobwalker/term1.jpg

    http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y276/thebobwalker/term2.jpg

    This second bit I have no idea. It has a part no. of AD10415/1

    http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y276/thebobwalker/pair.jpg

    in reply to: Help needed to identify Blenheim part #1220861
    mantog
    Participant

    Ah! yes, it’s a P not an R, well spotted! Can’t seem to find any reference of a Writing Pad Container on the web, does anyone have a picture of what one looks like, that hasn’t been mangled?!

    in reply to: Another airworthy Lanc on the cards?!! Maybe. Possibly #1223308
    mantog
    Participant

    Let us just dream for one moment, of this and the CWH machine in the air, together. Mmmmmm

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1173869
    mantog
    Participant

    I’m glad we’re going to see the Vulcan on the circuit this year, thanks to all parties involved. Maybe a corporate sponsor will look favourably on the number of times thousands of members of the public have chipped in cash to save it, and decide it’s a worthy project to get involved in!

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 313 total)