dark light

TobyV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 122 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Could this be the end of flying at Duxford? #1274565
    TobyV
    Participant

    Having driven on this stretch of the M11 for the first time just last weekend (purely by coincidence), I found that there are services at Bishop’s Storford – just the other side of the motorway from the M11 and Cambridge itself is only another 25 miles up the road which takes about 20 mins odd, probably less if you “go with flow” 😉 So I really dont see the point of putting services there anyway, it just seems as if the landowner is desparately trying to think of something to put there 😡

    in reply to: Lebanese Hunters #1284513
    TobyV
    Participant

    I have been trying to resist posting but feel I must (and see if anyone agrees with me).

    Ordinarily I would say that places such as Lebanon, where Islamic terrorists originate from, are just getting whats deserved, but on this occasion I think the Israelis have gone OTT.

    To my mind a more appropriate response would be to have sent in special forces to locate and free their captured soldiers and to make strikes against the Hezbollah rocket launching sites. What they have done is to destroy a lot of civilian infrastructure – power stations, roads, bridges, the civilian airport in Beirut, the port, killing lots of civilians along the way and preventing civilians from getting out or supplies getting in. I have even heard they attacked civilian convoys attempting to get to Syria. On the whole, the Lebanese do not seem to be the most radical Islamic nation, indeed theres quite a large Christian population and a variety of other religious groups who probably dont (or didnt) have a problem with Israel.

    Hezbollah and the Lebanese government are not one in the same and nor do I think the latter has much (if any) influence or control over the former, although they should probably be trying harder to keep them in line.

    Getting back on topic, even if Lebanon does have some Hunters, as has been said, there would be no point in sending them up against the IAF as they would get slaughtered. Aside from the Israelis having top American equipment, they also have arguably the most rigourous training and the most dedication of any airforce in the world with 3 trained pilots for each aircraft. A very large percentage of young Israelis also wish to join their armed forced and defend what they see as their country by religious right and so the ones that make it through are very dedicated to their purpose.

    in reply to: Latest pics of Cosford Cold War #1291481
    TobyV
    Participant

    The Viscount is off to East Fortune I believe. As is the One Eleven wherethey will join a chunk of 707 and a token piece of Trident 🙁

    in reply to: BOAC Speedbird Insignia at Heathrow #1293944
    TobyV
    Participant

    As a follow up to that, I have just found the clip and I cant actually see a Speedbird logo at all, only “B.O.A.C.” :rolleyes: They may well haev added one later or I suppose it isnt inconceivable that it was still around during the early BA years while the Negus & Negus livery was used.

    If you go to Hatton Cross tube station, just outside the airport, but once the main station serving the site, there are still blue Speedbird logos set onto an orange background in mosaic tiles on the pillars along the platforms.

    in reply to: BOAC Speedbird Insignia at Heathrow #1293948
    TobyV
    Participant

    The name of it escapes me right now, but before Waterside at Heathrow, there was a building probably constructed in the 1950s as teh HQ of BOAC. Your sign may have come from there or at least it may be similar to ones from there. There is a British Pathe video clip showing the building I mean and I am presently trying to re-locate it….

    in reply to: Question – Airfield spotted on takeoff #1295999
    TobyV
    Participant

    Try http://local.live.com instead 😉

    in reply to: Mig 15 vs Sabre F-86 Which was the best? #1304467
    TobyV
    Participant

    Hmm I’m a bit late in on this one… yup its true that the Soviets had an RR engine, think it was the Nene, a gift to them after the war from our Labour Govt :rolleyes:

    From what I have heard – and this is said to apply to other more recent USA-USSR/CIS fighter ‘pairings’ too – that in pure out and out performance terms, the MiG was better, however the Americans made up for this partly by the electronics onboard their aircraft (in terms of radar ranging gunsights and later in terms of missiles, radar, avionics, HUDs etc) and partly by the way they utilised their assets. The Americans were keen from early on in the idea of having aircraft equipped with radar surveying the whole of the combat zone and reporting contacts to the fighters whilst soviet-bloc thinking relied on ground radar and aircraft circling until they received vectors.

    in reply to: Spitfire profiles #1305037
    TobyV
    Participant

    I recommend the book “Spitfire in Action” by Squadron/Signal Publications. Its designed with modellers in mind and has excellent 3 views of most marks.

    in reply to: Gloster Aircraft Company #1311545
    TobyV
    Participant

    Bumping this one back in the hope that one person who hasnt seen this thread yet might be able to help! 😀

    in reply to: Any info on "Mutt" Summers #1311549
    TobyV
    Participant

    Certainly Summers’ first name was Joseph, most texts I have list him as M. J. Summers so perhaps “Mutt” derived from a Christian name he did not use? Trubshaw was E. Brian Trubshaw or ‘EBT’ as he often signed things!

    Interestingly Flt Lt (later Air Marshall) E. H. “Mouse” Fielden seems to be a link between both above mentioned test pilots as he was the pilot of the first aircraft Trubshaw ever saw as a boy. Later he would interview Trubshaw and become his CO in the RAF.

    In Trubshaw’s book “test pilot” he seems to express admiration for Summers and says that when he joined Vickers, Mutt had been a test pilot for over 25 years and flown over 40 prototypes so that would add up reasonably well with the information already posted.

    Trubshaw suggests however that by 1951, technological advancements were starting to get ahead of him, as Mutt wished to take the Valiant up for its first flight without the use of the powered controls, in manual reversion 😮

    Obviously I’ve never flown a V-bomber 😀 but I can only imagine this would be like trying to drive a car thats supposed to have power assisted steering when the PAS has failed, rather than like a car that wasnt supposed to have it in the first place.

    in reply to: Two Jaguar cockpits for sale #1312486
    TobyV
    Participant

    It could just be that Mick has a summer cold and touch of the snivvels? 😀 Or maybe it was just an honest typo :dev2:

    in reply to: Two Jaguar cockpits for sale #1312492
    TobyV
    Participant

    Who’s Dale? 😀

    in reply to: how much are they worth ? #1313080
    TobyV
    Participant

    I thought that was the old horseracing maxim (“Start with a large fortune, and buy a horse”) but I’m sure it applies equally 😀

    in reply to: Anne Burns 1915-2001 #1318982
    TobyV
    Participant

    I swear I’ve seen the name on here before.. perhaps Ant wasnt actually registered when this thread was started and registered subsequently?

    If not, Ant appears to be a member over at http://www.classicbritishaviation.org

    On topic, I must admit I dont know of many famous female aviators, save for a couple of recent ones, Barbara Harmer and Beatrice Vialle who both flew Concorde, for BA and AF respectively.

    in reply to: Falklands Anniversary/ Sea Harrier #1321663
    TobyV
    Participant

    Well there seem to be some supporters and some detractors on that thread. Certainly (from reading his book) I would agree that he seems a boastful, loud sort of person, but that and his obvious confidence in the abilities of the Shar may have served as useful propaganda before the war and perhaps given the Argentines the impression that the Shar was more of a force to be reckoned with that perhaps it was. I’m not saying it wasnt good, just that it wouldnt have been impossible to defeat one.

    Getting back to the purpose of the original tangent, I stand by my argument that a combination of the ship borne radars and the Blue Fox was probably the principle way hostile aircraft were detected, rather than any ground based radar that may or may not have been operating from Chilean territory. Could be wrong, none of us will know for sure until the records are released. Certainly the lack of some form of AEW aircraft (i.e. the Gannet!) was felt to be a problem, hence the adapted Sea King we developed subsequently.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 122 total)