dark light

RpR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 1,451 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: dedicated CAS planes dead? #2145254
    RpR
    Participant

    CAS aircraft are on the back-burner till some major military force looses a large amount of grunts becasue there are no aircraft that can loiter and strike and restrike a mobile enemy force that is turning a ground force into candidates for body bags.

    RpR
    Participant

    In Vietnam the wartime futige was not in any way similar to what happend in WW2. Pot n kettle.

    Macamara figured out something was wrong in the last 2 years of the war, but he could not identify it clear enough, and he was afraid to oppose his President.

    Macnara was a narcissitic asinine fool.
    He is the reason for the deaths and capture of many U.S. airmen.
    In his last interviews he is still trying to place blame for his cluster **** ideas on some one else.

    The Air Force wanted more F-105s, badly, not his pet project F-111, so he not only cancelled any more F-105s but under his orders tooling for the Thud was destroyed so it was impossible to produce any more and the only alternative was his pet project.

    RpR
    Participant

    There are tactical victories, and strategic victories. You clearly have no understanding of which is which.

    NO You are ignorant of the fact that had Nixon not screwed himself up it is well known here that Ford was a incompetent replacement.

    Those who knew Nixon say had he remained president the result for South and North Vietnam would have been totally different.
    As I said, the N. Vietnamese leader knew how U.S. politics operated and used it to his advantage.

    Cambodia paid the penalty for the failure of U.S. politicians.

    RpR
    Participant

    The N. Vietnamese won battles. You may not remember the Tet offensive, but I do. As a schoolboy I had a map on the wall on which I marked its progress. It was defeated, but only after N. Vietnamese victories in the early stages.

    The U.S. never lost a battlefield battle, period.

    The Tet Offensive all but wiped out the Viet Cong, which was bonus for the North as they did not have to deal with the Cong later on.
    Vietnam was political win for N.Vietnam, militarily they had there ass handed to them.

    You have to give credit to the leader of N. Vietnam for knowing Washington politics better than the assholes who supposedly work there.

    That has not changed any since then either as ISIS has shown.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264658
    RpR
    Participant

    Maybe the problem as they see it isn’t so much that there is a black on black crime problem (if they didn’t have access to guns…;o)) but that the US police appear to withdraw their guns and fire them for the simplest of reasons. They are almost like a toddlers security blanket – something to grip on to when there is a scarey problem. Worldwide there will always be a lot more interest in a story with a video of a cop shooting a man in the back for running away from a traffic stop, complete with the false claim that he had made a grab for the officer’s weapon, which makes police all over the world look like they were in on the lie. Man shoots other man outside a bar happens all the time, but the cops being caught out and seen to be caught out is newsworthy.

    Wasting my time telling you this, but the others who read it can make their own minds up so don’t forget that when slinging racial stereotypes around…

    There has been a problem with the way law officers are trained for long, long, long time. The first people to tell me this were former policemen and sheriffs.

    One said they have to deprogram them when they come out of the academy but at the same time the politicians who control the police force have taken away the discretion officers used to have in enforcing the law. They are told my way or the highway.
    If two gents had a scuffle, it used to be the law would tell them unless they want to be arrested to go home and cool off; now, even when the fact is obvious and witnesses loudly cry so, BOTH are handcuffed and arrested and taken to jail.
    I am not saying that law enforcement in the country is not becoming the very thing some movies show from utopian societies where every thing is illegal but guns are not the heart of the problem nor a major factor in changing how police work is done.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264672
    RpR
    Participant

    :love-struck:

    No Yank dickheads with killer guns. One point to add in a civilised society we do not need privately owned guns to protect us. Welcome back RpR I have missed you like a bad case of piles!

    I just said those guns they track you down hynotize you i.nto loading them and then they control you as they take you out to kill people, we are helpless.
    By his thread title snafu realizes this.
    Do you have a reading problem?

    You should really treat those piles.:love-struck::applause:

    Snafu:

    That football player babbles about oppression while black on black crime in Chicago leaves hundreds dead.
    Liberals and the black ” public leaders” ignore this fact while speaking moronical bits about why BLM exists.
    If they cared one slight bit about black lives they would have a campaign to do something about Chicago crime.

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2154950
    RpR
    Participant

    Gen YEager retired in 75, not 1997 and he spent the last few active years as an adviser to the Pakistani Gov.

    His last command of a US unit ended in 71, prior to the F-16 ro F-16 goring IOC, so he had no experience with them.

    The only thing he did post 75 was maintain his active flight status, which was more political than anything else.


    Yeager is fully retired from military test flying, after having maintained that status for three decades after his official retirement from the Air Force. On October 14, 1997, on the 50th anniversary of his historic flight past Mach 1, he flew a new Glamorous Glennis III, an F-15D Eagle, past Mach 1. The chase plane for the flight was an F-16 Fighting Falcon piloted by Bob Hoover, a legendary air-show pilot who had been Yeager’s wingman for the first supersonic flight.

    He flew the F-20 and and the F-15 so why would he not have flown the F-16?

    in reply to: General Discussion #264715
    RpR
    Participant

    Killer GUNS

    Oh me, oh my, they will hunt you down force you to load them and make you use them kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, blah, blah, blah….

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155473
    RpR
    Participant

    Yeager was an active Air Force pilot, not just a desk jocky untill he retired in 1997, he is not ignorant of the capabilities of U.S. aircraft that have seen combat, i.e. the F-15 and f-16 as he has flown both and not in the back seat.

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155953
    RpR
    Participant

    Yeagers last official flight while part of the Air Force was in 1997 when Yeager flew an F-15D and Bob Hoover flew chase in an F-16 a form of mimicking what they did when Yeager broke the sound barrier in the X-1, yes they exceeded Mach 1.

    in reply to: General Discussion #266685
    RpR
    Participant

    I thought RpR had disappeared up his own Motherf**king ass. Never mind perhaps he will be a victim in the next mass killing.

    No that trick is yours and yours alone.
    Now have at it, you are so good at it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #267497
    RpR
    Participant

    50 years ago today Charles Whitman killed 17 people, most from the tower over the University of Texas in Austin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Whitman#Shooting_from_the_tower

    A fine old American tradition?

    Those were the days my friend
    We thought they’d never end
    We’d sing and dance forever and a day
    We’d live the life we choose
    We’d fight and never lose
    For we were young and sure to have our way.
    Those were the days, oh yes those were the days

    in reply to: General Discussion #268580
    RpR
    Participant

    What it does do though, which you can not deny, is to show exactly what I was talking about before in sharp relief. The earlier attacks I mentioned were no more ‘islamic’ than the guy in Japan with his victims. They were nutjobs out on their own agenda and that agenda was their own secular grievance….denied asylum….mass-killer fixation….etc.

    OK, please, what is your proof that what you say here is fact other than your wishful thinking?

    in reply to: General Discussion #269766
    RpR
    Participant

    I was not going to post this but that SOB Wa**ker has got under my skin. I was in the Parachute Regiment and have had PTSB for years. Would RpR like to pick bits of women and children up after a bombing by the IRA when we were originally tasked with protecting the Catholic community?
    Perhaps the little ****face instead of going on about his sisters good works,the idiot with the .50 and his invisible friend just zipped his gob up.
    Perhaps if he wants to reply keep an eye on this thread as he will get his stupid remarks replied to in spades! Supercilious little ba*tard!

    This thread is titled Only in America, an area I do know personally, perhaps then you should keep your quips to areas of the world you do know about, not some where that is none of your concern as you do not live there.

    If you do not like my rhetoric do not read it.
    I said I had sympathy for you but your self-righteous attitude makes it a waste of time so as you are by your own admission mentally unstable , stop reading this thread and go see your psychiatrist soon..

    If you want to play the childish insult game, I am very good at it but this is the end of this exchange.
    One’s word’s, reflect one’s intellect, so you may reply in any manner you choose but I will not respond.

    in reply to: General Discussion #269853
    RpR
    Participant

    What about the freedom of those who were the targets and their right not to be killed? Or does that not count if it infringes on the rights of gun owners?

    I put such a silly notion of freedom in the same category as those killed in a accident by a driver who is not legally intoxicated, go to the hospital and die due to medical errors, etc.;
    life is a bitch, get used to it.

    Do not give me some numbers that are the same as saying life does not matter till at least x die from it, as that is the same as saying till x die from it you do not count.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 1,451 total)