Isn’t Christian faith an opinion based on interpretation of the knowledge contained in the Bible?
knowl·edge
noun
1 cognizance
2 the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association
No.
One hears and believes, or does not, without any proof, that is Christian faith.
If one tells you not to touch a flame, does one know that the flame will hurt the one, no.
If one goes ahead and sticks one hand into the flame, then the one has knowledge that what the one was told was good and true, but that is not how Christianity works.
That’s you screwed then… 😉 —- Nope.
That is the same opinion, liberal christians like to trot out to push their happy-thoughts dogma but in reality as it says —-“1 `Judge not, that ye may not be judged,
2 for in what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged, and in what measure ye measure, it shall be measured to you.” —- I am not worried as my opinion has no affect/effect on the life/lives those of whom I have thoughts as I am not in authority as many to most of those whom Jesus aimed this at were.Ah, I see where you went wrong. You appear to think knowledge is actually ignorance. —-[COLOR=”#800000″] That is where you went wrong, you think opinion is knowledge.
[/COLOR]“
Lets take a look at how willful ignorance works. I posted a link earlier that had 7 pages of references. How much of that total of 23 pages in the PDF did you actually read? & how many of the 7 pages of references did you look up & read?
You post a lot sites spouting opinion as fact, do you mean this one?
Atheism, Secularity, and Well-Being: How the Findings
of Social Science Counter Negative Stereotypes and
Assumptions
Phil Zuckerman*
Pitzer College, Claremont, California
‘As for suicide, however, regular church-attending Americans clearly have lower rates
than non-attenders (Comstock and Partridge 1972; Stack and Wasserman 1992; Martin
1984), although this correlation has actually not been found in other nations (Stack
1991). Of the current top-ten nations with the highest rates of suicide, most are relatively
secular (World Health Organization, 2003). But it is worth noting that eight of these
top-ten are post-Soviet countries, suggesting that decades of totalitarianism, depressed
economies, and a lack of basic human freedoms may be…—- [COLOR=”#800000″] Gee, what a nice rationalization—-I.e., I do not give a damn what facts say.
[/COLOR]
…While acknowledging the many disagreements and discrepancies above, the fact still
remains that a preponderance of studies do indicate that secular people don’t seem to fare
as well as their religious peers when it comes to selected aspects of psychological well being
(Hackney and Sanders 2003; Pargament 2002; Schnittker 2001; Hood et al. 1996;
Idler and Stanislav 1992; Petersen and Roy 1985). For instance, Ellison (1991), Jones
(1993), and Pollner (1989) found that religious beliefs correlate with a sense of lifesatisfaction
and well-being, and Myers (1992) found that religious faith is correlated with
hope and optimism. McIntosh et al. (1993) report that religious people have a better time
adjusting to and coping with sad or difficult life events than secular people; Mattlin et al.
(1990) and Palmer and Noble (1986) report that religion is beneficial for people dealing
with chronic illness or the death of a loved one. Based on a systematic examination
of over 100 studies – and drawing heavily from the work of Koenig et al. (2001) –
McCullough and Smith (2003, 191–192) conclude that ‘‘people who are religious devout,
but not extremists, tend to report greater subjective well-being and life satisfaction…more
ability to cope with stress and crises…and fewer symptoms of depression’’ than secular
people. However, it should be pointed out that some have vigorously refuted such
sweeping conclusions, arguing that the link between religiosity and positive health
outcomes is grossly exaggerated (Sloan and Bagiella 2002). Finally, there is certainly the
possibility that because being non-religious in the United States makes one a member of —- Sounds like “I cannot refute this so out of desperation I will add this.”
a widely un-liked, distrusted, and stigmatize minority, this could take a psychological toll
on the mental health and sense of well-being of atheists and secular people, who may suffer
from a sense of isolation, alienation, or rejection from family, colleagues, or peers
(Downey 2004).
As for suicide, however, regular church-attending Americans clearly have lower rates
than non-attenders (Comstock and Partridge 1972; Stack and Wasserman 1992; Martin
1984), although this correlation has actually not been found in other nations (Stack
1991). Of the current top-ten nations with the highest rates of suicide, most are relatively
secular (World Health Organization, 2003). But it is worth noting that eight of these
top-ten are post-Soviet countries, suggesting that decades of totalitarianism, depressed
economies, and a lack of basic human freedoms may be….’-—Ah, once again, well the facts say this BUT, a little rationalization can take those ignore those facts and present the truth as what ever I/we want it to be.
Your 23 pages, are 23 pages of opinionated bs as far as facts go.
What are you on, I’m reasonably neutral on the religous issue, don’t stick your assorted frauds and fantasies down my throat and I won’t trouble you, can you live and let live and please understand that your’s is not the only valid opinion on here.
Discuss, debate, sure, but why so dogmatic, you believe, fine, many don’t give a toss about any religion so long as it doesn’t interfere with the more important aspects of life and living. There are clearly quite a few on here who think you’re barking, I’ve no problem with that, just bark up your own damn tree please.
The highlighted above says you are lying so I will leave it at that.
He thinks scientific proof of something is an opinion. We have scientific proof that the entire creation is myth never happened.—- ROFLMAO.
Unless you have had to deal with the insidious form of religion you find in the US you’d have no idea just how willfully ignorant some people can choose to be.
Sure we do, sure we do, we have you.
I am sure there are some ponzi people who would like to work with you.
So, why do you need a gun?
Someone with your Religious ideology and a penchant for firearms is a tragedy just waiting for an excuse.
Regards,
kev35
Who said anything about need and what do guns have to do with this thread?
If you are going to turn this into a personal invective, take it else where.
I have, in fact I’ve read and studied the whole Bible, several times!
and to make things interesting…
I’ve also read the Qur’an!For those that haven’t I suggest you do, you’d be surprised just how much the two have in common! —- One should not be as Jesus Gospel was hundreds of years old when the Muslim religion was created.
Much like the Gnostic religion it took the Gospel and corrupted it.And to be picky….
It’s “you’re”
My bad.
Lone Survivor.
See it, it speaks for itself.
A good friend of mine, who happens to be a Pastor, made a statement a few years ago that made a lot of people stop and think:
“We should be more like Jesus and not be so religious”
I do not know your pastor or the doctrine his church follows, but such remarks are made in the Bible, to paraphrase, keep your conversations, direct relations, with God in absolute privacy, but spread the Good News (gospel) ethusiastically without fear.
Fighting over which dogma is correct, does not do the latter. Sadly such cluster-f distortions of Jesus word started shortly after he left with Peter and Paul going head to head, over some one was wrong.
What (if anything) does the Bible say will happen to a person who commits suicide?
There is one verse, of which that is not the central topic so do not ask me to paste as I am not going read the entire New Testament to find it, that says those who end their life before their appointed time will greatly regret it.
That is the only thing it says.
My major was creative writing.
I do not know the context of the subject but “the twenty-six year old (girl or woman as context fits) …” or ” the girl was twenty-six…” is a smoother transition than “she was 26”.
She was 26 — sounds more like part of a list.
When writing fiction, flow is very important.
A quiet day for a publicity hungry police captain, maybe?
LOL, the few articles on the net about it seem to want to omit, or were written in an evasive manner, items that were repeated in TV and radio shows last week, i.e. that persons from each of these agencies were there as an witnesses to the occurrences.
“Many of the events are detailed in nearly 800 pages of official records obtained by The Indianapolis Star and recounted in more than a dozen interviews with police, DCS personnel, psychologists, family members and a Catholic priest.“
DCS are the people who can take away your child if they so choose.
The psychologist who had first called the woman a nut-job before going to the house, after going there, to check on the child’s welfare, had to change his report and status of the woman.
I wondered how long it would take for this to get posted here.
Wasn’t he the one that questioned the validity of President Obama’s birth certificate?
Anyway, Sheriff Arpaio seems to struggle with the concept of being “liberal”.
No he does not, in the U.S. liberal means giving power to the government to tell you how to lead your life.
How can anyone with “wisdom” equate liberalism of any kind, even the US kind, with being in jail?
Was he joking? Or being ironic?
I suspect not.
If you lived in the U.S. and compared what, depending on State, anyone could do thirty years ago without concern, with what is illegal today in one form or another, you would know .
exactly what he means.
By law, I can now be jailed for not having health insurance.
For your viewing pleasure: