No gear has been there all along..scroll few pages back !
http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=227305&stc=1&d=1397381074
That is a stick-man drawing that shows nothing.
If you cannot show what type of hydraulic system is used, with space taken up by it, both up and down, it is just another silly impossible gimmick due to the laws of physics as is your entire aircraft.
Your scale drawing are not to any known scale but when one presents an impossible gimmick that is to be expected.
I am giving your concept as much respect as it deserves.
Wow, how could we have missed it, your munchkin mobile has no landing gear.
An Me-163 wannabe, and probably as effective also.

Captain America — Nah na, na nah — Winter Soldier
The chase and shooting scenes as is the norm nowadays are over done to the point of being a bit silly, but other wise a very good film.
I bet 30 300 m ceiling and mach 3 top speed you can avoid s-400 even if it locked on you.
Neither of which could your Munchkin mobile get any where even close to.
It is incredible how you don’t learn a thing. Light weight fighter mafia has proofed this.
Your scam has been caught and you simply will not admit it.
Go back to your F-15 E comparison and take your pilot image and place it, at that scale under the F-15 standing straight; the F-15 stands higher than a B-58 Hustler.
Oh yes, unless your front bay missiles are about two-inches thick, your pilot is sitting on or between their fins.
You pilot is supposed to be six feet three inches tall yet when you compare it to the F-15 either your pilot is the size of a six year old boy or the F-15 landing gear is six-feet three inches long.
I am amazed at how gullible to your cartoon dimensions and cartoon physics so many here are, but as you most post to your self with your aircraft, that is expected.
I hate to destroy Fantasy Island here but this says in abstract considreations for storing fuel in an aircraft:
1 Introduction
A fighter aircraft fuel system is a system of many
parts. Fuel fills up large parts of the aircraft not occupied
with other equipment and the many different
systems of the aircraft often pass through the tanks.
To keep control of the center of gravity the tanks are
divided into smaller parts and are interconnected by
pipes. Fuel is pumped between the tanks to a collector
tank which has a negative g-load compartment to
enable the aircraft to fly inverted. The tanks are also
pressurized to avoid evaporation of the fuel at high
altitudes.
When designing aircraft fuel systems several issues
demand detailed simulation models for analysis.
The most important are
x Is it possible to provide the engine with fuel
with enough pressure regardless of what pilot
maneuvers and equipment faults that occur?
x Can the amount of accessible fuel be correctly
determined at all times?
x Can the structural strength of the hull and all
installation parts be estimated with good
precision?
When these problems are solved, questions related
to optimization of weight, fuel consumption,
and heat storing capabilities as well as other issues
need to be considered.
The fuel system simulation models needed to describe
the system tend to be large (~400 state variables,
~16000 time-varying variables) due to the
high number of parts involved. The combination of
fuel (incompressible fluid) and pressurization air
(compressible fluid) and the necessity to handle both
fast time constants (as when a tank get full) and slow
time constants (heat storage) make the models stiff
and a bit awkward to work with. Still, the information
gained from using the simulation models more
than pays off the work spent to keep the models executable
and is seen as a prerequisite for successful
fuel system design work at Saab Aeronautics. A
theoretical background on fuel system design can be
found in [1] and how Dymola and other simulation
tools are used in the system design process is described
in [2] and [3].
His “pinching” comment amplifies how clueless on aircraft construction he actually is, oh wait, it is here, ZEE PLANE–ZEE–PLANE!
Thanks for the compliments !
Ummm, ROLF, yeah, it would seem you are so far behind the curve, you are stuck in the first dip.
No sir !
Ejection from this stealth jet can take place also in super sonic region..therefore that it takes place not only upwards but also rearwards. This is the safest imaginable ejection from a fast moving jet aircraft !
Also firing missiles at supersonic speed is easy as the projectiles are in the centerline of the craft !
It stays a cartoon if you don’t fund it…anyone interested ?!
Pilot is 6’3” in the drawing.
rgds,
Juke
They tried the rocket rail supersonic system in the F-106 and pilots did not stop dying because of it till they got rid of it.
Also as with the F-106, the canopy metal frame being directly above the seat makes ejecting through the canopy impossible if the canopy will not jettison.
As there is zero room below it, it would be impossible to work on it.
You are way behind the curve on this one as with most items.
Wow your Munchkin pilot sits on top of the missiles and loses his already stubby legs in an ejection, brilliant.
I realize you know as full well as any one here that, that drawing is just that a cartoon drawing that defies physics for the purpose of seeing how long you can keep this going, well I am out of here.
Skylancer had 5 degs steeper windshield than Skyray…but F-20 had actually 7 degrees steeper than F-5…wonder why ? F-20 had 14 degrees steeper wind screen steepness than a F4D Skyray !
Biggest problem in my dream is a company that could manufacture them and funding most likely.
Angle means nothing the F5D SKYLANCER, nothing to do with the F-5 had an entirely different shape windscreen which allowed it to go 200 mph faster with the same engine in a larger heavier aircraft.
A person who dealt with the F-20 said what went wrong you are just blowing hot air with your opinion.
It took me 5 minutes to say why F-20 was a failure..the F404 engine weighs 500 kilos more than the two J-85 together…it doubled the weight in the aft CG location !
That is your opinion and does not change the fact your munchkin mini[jet is not feasible in any manner.


No different from the major media left-wing news that ruined the life of a man by accusing him of an attack down south some years ago.
Richard Jewell
“Despite never being charged, he underwent a “trial by media” with great toll on his personal and professional life. Eventually he was completely exonerated and Eric Robert Rudolph was later found to have been the bomber.
In 2006, Governor Sonny Perdue publicly thanked Jewell on behalf of the state of Georgia for saving the lives of those at the Olympics.”
Also from New York Post
4 innocent people wrongly accused of being Boston Marathon bombing suspects
Everyone, please remember:
It’s better to be late and right than early and wrong
By Chris Gayomali | April 19, 201