There’s your problem right there. You utterly fail to comprehend the difference between the everyday definition of “theory” & the scientific definition. I did ask you to pay close attention to the cognitive dissonance part… Why didn’t you?
The only reason you follow which ever religion you choose to is because of where you were born.
Let me ask you a few more questions:What evidence exists for your deity that doesn’t exist for any of the others?—- I answered that you do not like the basic truth that governs Christianity, period.
Why would a perfect deity’s divinely inspired work not be perfect & transcendent?—- Because God did not and that is all anyone knows.
At the same time, as you wish to play god, how could God do that?What separates your faith from the faith of those who follow other religions?—- There is only one God of gods. Anything ruled by committee has no ruler.
Religion is largely determined by culture & geography, why would your god choose only to save those who live in certain areas? —- Nothing in the Bible says any such thing.
Can you accurately & completely define the following: God, Soul, Faith, Spirit.
God: A title given to the supreme deity.
Spirit: The actuall life giving substance of a living creature.
Sould: The true character of one that is defined by the ability to accept or reject good and evil; not contained in the spirit of animals.
Faith: complete trust or confidence in someone or something without proof.Who or what created god? —- Like all things always has been and always will be.
Would you kill your only son if god asked you to?
Your last question is asinine and will be treated as such.
There’s your problem right there. You utterly fail to comprehend the difference between the everyday definition of “theory” & the scientific definition. I did ask you to pay close attention to the cognitive dissonance part… Why didn’t you?
The only reason you follow which ever religion you choose to is because of where you were born.
Let me ask you a few more questions:What evidence exists for your deity that doesn’t exist for any of the others?—- I answered that you do not like the basic truth that governs Christianity, period.
Why would a perfect deity’s divinely inspired work not be perfect & transcendent?—- Because God did not and that is all anyone knows.
At the same time, as you wish to play god, how could God do that?What separates your faith from the faith of those who follow other religions?—- There is only one God of gods. Anything ruled by committee has no ruler.
Religion is largely determined by culture & geography, why would your god choose only to save those who live in certain areas? —- Nothing in the Bible says any such thing.
Can you accurately & completely define the following: God, Soul, Faith, Spirit.
God: A title given to the supreme deity.
Spirit: The actuall life giving substance of a living creature.
Sould: The true character of one that is defined by the ability to accept or reject good and evil; not contained in the spirit of animals.
Faith: complete trust or confidence in someone or something without proof.Who or what created god? —- Like all things always has been and always will be.
Would you kill your only son if god asked you to?
Your last question is asinine and will be treated as such.
is F-35 the next F-4 Phantom, Hell no!!
the next F-105 Thunderchief? Yes!
Why on earth would you insult the Thunderchief like that.
The F-35 looks more like the next F-104.
There’s your problem right there. You utterly fail to comprehend the difference between the everyday definition of “theory” & the scientific definition. I did ask you to pay close attention to the cognitive dissonance part… Why didn’t you?
Because the word means only one thing; therefore these supposed scientists are so desperate to try to float their theories boats, that they figured if they just gave the word a meaning that is the antithesis of what it actually means, that the unlettered masses would never notice.
A naive mark may fall for such a Three-Card-Monte type trick, but I have faith most are not that obtuse.
There’s your problem right there. You utterly fail to comprehend the difference between the everyday definition of “theory” & the scientific definition. I did ask you to pay close attention to the cognitive dissonance part… Why didn’t you?
Because the word means only one thing; therefore these supposed scientists are so desperate to try to float their theories boats, that they figured if they just gave the word a meaning that is the antithesis of what it actually means, that the unlettered masses would never notice.
A naive mark may fall for such a Three-Card-Monte type trick, but I have faith most are not that obtuse.
Only an idiot would think that 6-7 billion people can not have any effect on planet earth. would you p!ss in the same well that you drink from, so why can’t you understand that is what we are doing to the air that we breath. At the time of the last ice age the population was probably less than a couple of million people.
This planet is not like a computer it does not have reset button once we change it it’s gone forever.
So say men that wish elevate man to the level of the gods.
This nature of this planet could reduce the population of humans to millions if what happened at Yellowstone happens again.
Man does not like the idea of a god because then man can no longer pontificate at what the future will be if we do not listen to certain men.
Only an idiot would think that 6-7 billion people can not have any effect on planet earth. would you p!ss in the same well that you drink from, so why can’t you understand that is what we are doing to the air that we breath. At the time of the last ice age the population was probably less than a couple of million people.
This planet is not like a computer it does not have reset button once we change it it’s gone forever.
So say men that wish elevate man to the level of the gods.
This nature of this planet could reduce the population of humans to millions if what happened at Yellowstone happens again.
Man does not like the idea of a god because then man can no longer pontificate at what the future will be if we do not listen to certain men.
A word can have multiple meanings, depending on context. The meaning it has for scientist or specialist may be very different to the meaning it has for a layman. That is why I can chug down a beer while reading a technical paper on chugging in liquid propellant rocket motors, then go outside to pet a neighbour’s chug puppy.
.
I knew a street hustler very well, that is the rationalization of the truth that they often use.
There is truth and there is bs, changing the meaning of a word to fit one’s rhetoric is bs.
A word can have multiple meanings, depending on context. The meaning it has for scientist or specialist may be very different to the meaning it has for a layman. That is why I can chug down a beer while reading a technical paper on chugging in liquid propellant rocket motors, then go outside to pet a neighbour’s chug puppy.
.
I knew a street hustler very well, that is the rationalization of the truth that they often use.
There is truth and there is bs, changing the meaning of a word to fit one’s rhetoric is bs.
Rubbish, it stopped being a theory a long time ago,
LOL–That is the same attitude young earth creationists have when confronted with the fact there is no proof for their dogma.
Rubbish, it stopped being a theory a long time ago,
LOL–That is the same attitude young earth creationists have when confronted with the fact there is no proof for their dogma.
If we had two identical planets,
Planet A inhabited by religious people,
Planet B inhabited by scientists ,biologists and non believers ,
I wonder which planet would thrive or die.Would they both die off along with the inhabitants?
That would depend solely on whether or not there is a god,
If we had two identical planets,
Planet A inhabited by religious people,
Planet B inhabited by scientists ,biologists and non believers ,
I wonder which planet would thrive or die.Would they both die off along with the inhabitants?
That would depend solely on whether or not there is a god,
The word theory has two definitions. 1 = A mere notion, idea, or speculation. Yes you could dream those up all day long, but you couldn’t dream up a theory belonging to the second definition, or scientific theory, which is –
a hypothesis that has been confirmed or established by observation or experiment , and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts; a statement of what are held to be the general laws, principles, or causes of something known or observed. ** The Greatest Show on Earth – Richard Dawkins
Evolution firmly belongs in the second definition.
The word theory has only one meaning, regardless of scientists attempts to change its meaning to fit their desires.
A word either means what it says or it is worthless babble.
Your two supposed meanings counter each other so that is obtuse.
Such attempts at changing what a word means is usually called vulgarization of a word.
Theory– from Oxford English Dictionary, the one most used by scholars
noun (plural theories)
a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained: Darwin’s theory of evolution
a set of principles on which the practice of an activity is based: a theory of education music theory
an idea used to account for a situation or justify a course of action: my theory would be that the place has been seriously mismanaged
Mathematics a collection of propositions to illustrate the principles of a subject.
The word theory has two definitions. 1 = A mere notion, idea, or speculation. Yes you could dream those up all day long, but you couldn’t dream up a theory belonging to the second definition, or scientific theory, which is –
a hypothesis that has been confirmed or established by observation or experiment , and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts; a statement of what are held to be the general laws, principles, or causes of something known or observed. ** The Greatest Show on Earth – Richard Dawkins
Evolution firmly belongs in the second definition.
The word theory has only one meaning, regardless of scientists attempts to change its meaning to fit their desires.
A word either means what it says or it is worthless babble.
Your two supposed meanings counter each other so that is obtuse.
Such attempts at changing what a word means is usually called vulgarization of a word.
Theory– from Oxford English Dictionary, the one most used by scholars
noun (plural theories)
a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained: Darwin’s theory of evolution
a set of principles on which the practice of an activity is based: a theory of education music theory
an idea used to account for a situation or justify a course of action: my theory would be that the place has been seriously mismanaged
Mathematics a collection of propositions to illustrate the principles of a subject.