The best way to prepare the 3rd World War (Islam vs everybody else) is to let the Islamists ruin a maximum of Countries and show their natural tendencies to oppression . Then , the West will hit hard on them once for all .

Cheers .

You are ignoring the fact that in the Muslim countries it is Sunni vs Shiite.

If you want to see why some politicians are worried about Iran getting a nuclear bomb, especially with the gent running the show currently in charge, then study up oh how the “end times” will be brought about in the Shiite version the Muslim religion.

Are you supposed to keep your hands on the wheel then 😉 ??
What happened to the original smileys ?? these ones are truly awful LOL

I have to laugh driving on the motorways – one is sort of stuck between the 50mph lane hoggers and the lane changing nazis that make lane changing an art form LOL….I do sometimes have a little fun with the lane change nazis :D… a subtle increase in speed usually does the trick 😀

Back when I was a very aggressive driver, it was the people who either were brain dead, or “have a little fun with lane change” that I would heap revenge on.

I would get in front of them and lay one the brakes.
As I said, the last time, was the last time, as the person went partly into the ditch and almost got his vehicle side-ways, SO, playing those games can be more deadly than one thinks.

I suggest both of you look at some of the TV programs from the States re guns, hunting etc, it may well open your eyes.Most animals are shot by hunters as a trophy, not that they need to shoot them for food, which is an entirely different matter.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

I find trophy hunting to vary between silly to asininely moronic depending on the situation.

[QUOTE=Lincoln 7;2034850]

Ahh, So Rpr and Chas, then you must by the same token, hang a murderer, and not put them in jail for the rest of their life, for killing another creature, ie, a human. You can’t have your cake and eat it as well.
Jim.
Lincoln .7

Brig back the electric chair once called Old Sparky and put on a show.

Fuel weight of 30 tons, the range of at least 7,000 km, combat radius – 2500 km

Who ever thought up those numbers, is living on Fantasy Island.

Is this another of Topspeed’s designs?

I believe the wings could accomodate large fuel tanks, yes? And the actual width of the weapons bay will have implications for volume for fuel as well.

The large weapon bay may well leave some room to spare even holding two YJ-12s or even a pair of CJ-10 cruise missiles, but in loadouts carrying multiple smaller missiles like YJ-91, or even multiple PGMs, the fit may be more snug.

The B-58 carried slightly over 70,000 lbs. of fuel, mostly in its wings.
With air to air refueling it could carry an absolute maximum of 101,627 pound of fuel, and its range was still considered lacking.
It had a range of just over 2,000 miles if it never broke the Mach.
If it it broke the Mach, its range was less than 2,000 miles and this is only Mach 1.3 not Mach 2. which is why its combat radius was averaged to 1,750 miles.

This plane cannot carry anywhere near the fuel the Hustler did as the Hustler was designed to use every inch of space for a purpose.
It appears to be a slightly larger than nineteen fifties size supersonic fighter bomber, or strike fighter, with a stealth type airframe.

Hmmm, let’s see, a B-58 which was lot larger had a loaded weight of just under 68,000 lbs. with a wing area of just over 143 meter squared.

This thing is supposed to have loaded weight of 68 metric tons?
Lets round that down to 2,200 lbs which equals just under 150,000 lbs. and this thing is supposed to achieve mach 1.6 on two engines.

wing area of ​​144 m2
side view of 62.27 m2
view from above of 253 m2
Front view of 20 m2

volume of 136 m3 glider
maximum take-off weight of 68 tons

the maximum speed of M = 1.6
engines with afterburning thrust of 15 – 20 tons

Some one has a wild imagination.

Sorry but comparing deer to human beings is a bit obtuse at best.

As far as the Sandy Hook item; there are plenty of laws that the goblin broke including murder so your analogy makes no sense.