Finnish defense minister has given a “go ahead” for HX program to replace Hornets.
The Defence Forces got a mandate from Defence Minister Jussi Niinistö to start the HX fighter project. The aim is to replace the operational capability of the Air Force F/A-18 aircraft which will be phased out as of 2025. The decision on starting the project is based on the Government programme.
Developments in Finland’s operating environment and the tasks of the Defence Forces, the Air Force and air defence require that the capabilities provided by the Hornet fleet be replaced by the end of the 2020s. The working group which was set up to assess the replacement of the Air Force F/A-18 aircraft proposed in June the procurement of multi-role fighters.
The capabilities of multi-role fighters play a significant role in securing a pre-emptive threshold which would stop a possible aggressor from using military force against Finland. The capabilities of the Hornet fleet are an integral part of air defence and the joint fire capability of the Defence Forces to engage land- and sea-based targets. In addition, these capabilities support intelligence, surveillance and C2 systems in the Defence Forces.The life-span of the Hornet fleet which will end by the end of the 2020s is limited by three main factors: weakening of relative capabilities, fatigue of structures and the availability of the aircraft’s systems, spare parts and software. To extend the life-span of the Hornet fleet would not be cost-effective and, from the perspective of Finland’s defence, a sufficient decision.
As the project to replace the capabilities of the Hornet fleet will take about 15 years to complete the decision was taken to act on the recommendation of the working group. The decision on submitting requests for information and calls for tenders will be made during this parliamentary term while the actual procurement decision will have to be made in the early 2020s.
The replacement is not possible within the framework of the current defence budget and therefore requires separate funding. The parliament will decide on the funding under its budgetary authority.
For more information, please contact Project Coordinator Lauri Puranen at the Ministry of Defence, tel. +359 295 140403.
Orlan-10 was shot down or crashed in Syria.
CH-4 commercial. Apparently includes footage from Iraq.
this thing is huge for amount of payload its carrying. the tire dia is very small. no self protection mean only can be used in non contest airspace.
And here it is with good loiter time and it actually hit’s it targets (no dump bombs what miss their targets). Tires too small? Now you are just gasping for straws.
Not wanting to brag or anything but I was right once again.
Armed CH-4B shown to media.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]241074[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]241075[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]241076[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]241077[/ATTACH]
read TR1 post #331.for all you know the youtube vids could be from all sorts of incidents
As if he doesn’t have any motives to say so? Fact is that Russians are supporting worst dictator of recent history. Putin is just another barbarian like Assad and ISIS hordes.
Russia really must be something. Seems like the rest of the world has been trying real hard to find these (by now almost mythological) moderate rebels for years, Russia went in and pounced right on them on their very first try. 😉
Apropos – I’ll second what TR1 wrote in #333. Fascinating how predictable it all is.
Aftermath of Russian strikes. Yeah, Russia is really on to something… no different from Assad or ISIS.
https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/3mzg5n/videos_show_dead_civilians_after_russia/
Iran is a sovereign country and have every right to have Su-30s or S-300s if they see fit.
Don’t see slightest reason why would they need approval for that..
Yeah, this is dumb. Obama’s policy was to bring Iranian’s to the table through sanctions and secure a deal that would stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Israel and republicans are bitching just because. Iran are otherwise free to buy whatever the **** they want from whoever.
Not to **** on your cornflakes but…
However, in July 2015 it was decided that from the day it is confirmed that Iran has implemented certain restrictions on its nuclear programme, supplies of major arms and related components and services would be possible with the specific approval from the Security Council and that all arms related sanctions would be lifted 5 to 8 years later.
http://www.sipri.org/databases/embargoes/un_arms_embargoes/iran
OP is good example why this and many other forums should have age limit.
Is it known how many cruise missiles FAF have ordered?
70 JASSM
The X-32’s loss had nothing to do with stealth.
The F-23 supposedly had better stealth characteristics than the F-22, and it relied on less of an S-duct.
Clearly, stealth ducts are not the only way to get stealth.
I didn’t write that s-duct was only way but it seems to be the best way and that’s why American and Chinese engineers have chosen s-ducts over blockers. If you take a look stealth drones only RQ-170 has a radar blocker (1970s vintage design)… other UCAV’s have s-duct.
It’s not the curvature alone what makes s-duct effective.
lol, I saw that part too.
Particularly poor observation- since an internal Sukhoi magazine explicitly points out they used S-ducts on the S-37- so its not like they are unaware of this technique and have failed to adhere to it properly:
Nevermind as well the fact that other stealth designs have relied on blockers…the notion that Sukhoi messed up on S-ducts has always been daft beyond belief.
X-32 used blockers and lost the competition (of course not only because of that) and relatively cheap RQ-170 what always had danger of ending enemy hands uses blocker similar to F-117. Clearly Americans don’t think too highly about blockers when compared to the s-duct way of hiding the engines from radar.
J-10B PESA Vs. J-10C AESA??? :confused:
Don’t know about J-10B radar but J-10C radar certainly looks like AESA.