dark light

Jur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 1940 AP Cockpit Photo's… #444396
    Jur
    Participant

    I think that in 1940 large format view camera’s (e.i. 4×5 or even 8×10 inch) with wide-angle lenses were used to photograph the cockpits. On a 4×5″ camera a focal length of at least 65mm would have been needed. An advantage of the view camera is also that it was possible to make perspective corrections by making use of the tilt and shift functions. The large negative format allowed for retouching the negative as well as the prints. It seems obvious that heavy retouching was required to improve the contours of objects to give the illusion of maximum depth of field.

    Nowadays I would use a DSLR (35mm full frame or medium format) with a super wide-angle lens (14-20mm on 35mm full frame). Compared with larger format camera’s there is the advantage of improved depth of field. To a degree perspective correction could be achieved by using a tilt-and-shift lens, but there aren’t many of those available with a focal length shorter than 24mm. However perspective correction can also be achieved in post-processing of digital files.

    in reply to: Staggerwing N295BS #1085599
    Jur
    Participant

    Belgian Prince Barnard

    Ouch…..:mad:
    It was HRH Prince Bernard of the Netherlands:)

    in reply to: Green cast at Hendon #444542
    Jur
    Participant

    It really is a white balance problem. The light is very tricky with different coloured light sources. As Robbo advised: do shoot in RAW to be able to make WB corrections in post-processing. Of course a dedicated WB set-up can also be used.

    I always carry a very small WB grey-card (WhiBal), which I use to make a test shot with. In post-processing I use this shot to make a WB correction by picking the neutral grey area on this card. I then copy the WB of the corrected image and use this on my other images taken in the the same light.

    Before WB correction
    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/WB_01.jpg

    After WB correction
    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/WB_02.jpg

    Jur
    Participant

    Lovely footage; reminds me of my only flight in a Royal Netherlands AF T-33 in 1969. The trip went from Eindhoven AB via Denmark to the south of Norway and back.

    Jur
    Participant

    Lovely footage; reminds me of my only flight in a Royal Netherlands AF T-33 in 1969. The trip went from Eindhoven AB via Denmark to the south of Norway and back.

    in reply to: Aviodrome in dire straits? #1041730
    Jur
    Participant

    I think it is not so much the distance that is the problem. It’s the fact it’s in the middle of nowhere.

    When the museum was at Schiphol I visited it regularly. When I went spotting at AMS and the weather turned unfavourable, the museum was always there to provide shelter at a modest price. Add to that the “tourists” that want to take their (grand)children to the airport and combine it with the museum.

    Although it’s true that the museum used to be at Schiphol Airport, I would be very surprised to learn that the number of visitors has declined since it moved to Lelystad. I have visited the museum since it opened in 1960 at Schiphol East and also was a frequent visitor at Schiphol Centre, since I have been an air traffic controller there for more than 35 years. In my recollection the Aviodome was always very quiet.

    An important aspect of the present location was that the Aviodrome moved much more into the direction of a “living” museum, with regular “theme” days, visiting aircraft and the regular operation of the DDA fleet, DC-2, Catalina, local historic aircraft etcera. This would never have been possible at Schiphol Airport.

    There’s one thing that has surprised me over the years: the obvious lack by the museum to raise public interest! Not even the local newspapers mentioned upcoming events. Most of the time I had to learn via Flypast Magazine that such events were in the pipeline! My daughter and grandchildren live in Lelystad, but they had to rely on me to be informed about events in the Aviodrome. My youngest granddaughter even is a member of the Airscouts who have their homebase at the Aviodrome!!

    in reply to: Aviodrome in dire straits? #1041953
    Jur
    Participant

    I go to The Hague fairly often and have nonetheless never managed to visit the museum. Despite the excellent Dutch train network, it seems like quite a daunting trip to get there from The Hague.

    The travel distance between Schiphol Airport or Amsterdam Central Station to Lelystad Airport seems to be more relevant to me. There is a frequent train connection between Amsterdam CS and Lelystad (40 min). From the Lelystad railway station there’s a bus connection (30 min intervals on avg) which takes you to Lelystad Airport in about 15 minutes. If you compare that with the time it takes to travel from the centre of London to the Hendon RAF museum it isn’t quite so bad……

    in reply to: TF-51 Mustang project at MeierMotors Serial 44-63473 #1048563
    Jur
    Participant

    Although I’m not a big fan of a high polish finish, I must say that this aircraft looks stunning in all details. Congratulations to everyone concerned at MeierMotors!

    in reply to: Cold weather camera use (-35 degrees C) #444634
    Jur
    Participant

    The Canon 5D MKII is reported to have a very good sealing against moisture, so condensation inside the body should not be a problem. Have you read this report? Click

    in reply to: New collection of historic aircraft in Germany #1074725
    Jur
    Participant

    First aircraft was Morane-Saulnier MS.760 N751P.

    Nice to see this a/c type again! During my initial air traffic controller training, at the Dutch Government Flying School (Rijksluchtvaartschool) at Groningen Airport Eelde in 1965, at had the chance to make quite a number of flights in the school’s Morane Saulnier MS.760B Paris II aircraft (in PH-MSS, MST, MSU, MSV, MSX and MSW).

    It would be nice to see this rare type operate once more in European skies.
    However the correct registration of this aircraft is N751PJ (c/n 51). It seems to be in good shape.

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/EHGG_1965_07.jpg

    in reply to: EX TFC F7F #1082507
    Jur
    Participant

    Can anyone remember who brought TFC’s EX F7F tigercat
    ‘US Marines 80425 4-WT’

    THanks

    This one?

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/Tigercat.jpg

    in reply to: Aviodrome in dire straits? #1083005
    Jur
    Participant

    A cockpit view of the Constellation

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/Aviodrome2006-04-13_0052-1.jpg

    in reply to: Aviodrome in dire straits? #1083572
    Jur
    Participant

    Never been there, but it looks a fantastic place.
    It must have been their Constellation which I saw do a low pass at Southend a few years ago, en-route to the museum ?

    The Aviodrome Constellation

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/MelbourneRace_206-1.jpg

    in reply to: Aviodrome in dire straits? #1084052
    Jur
    Participant

    I have known and enjoyed the Aviodrome and its predecessors at Schiphol Airport since it first opened in the early sixties at the original site at Schiphol East where nowadays the main building of LVNL / Air Traffic Control The Netherlands is located.

    The move to Lelystad was inspired by great examples like Duxford and the wish to enhance the rather static Aviodrome museum with live aviation activities. Since then the Dutch Dakota Association also moved its main activities to Lelystad with their DC-2 and DC-3’s. The Fokker Four association with their S-11’s is present and in many activities the Early Bird Association (which restores and operates many historic aircraft) joined in. Lelystad did also become the home base for the PBY Catalina.

    In the past 10 years the Aviodrome has been very active in acquiring interesting and unique aircraft, like the L-749 Constellation and the first production example of the Fokker Friendship. It was (still is?) their aim to operate those aircraft on a regular basis. This has failed so far, probably because of stringent CAA regulations and European insurance requirements.
    Despite this Aviodrome seemed to concentrate to collect even more more (static) aircraft, like a KLM 747, Fokker 100 and activities had been undertaken to add a Fokker F-28 and a Douglas DC-8 to their collection. When sufficient funds are available this should be applauded of course; otherwise I think the focus should have been on the existing collection and especially on the operation of the magnificent Constellation and F-27. In the past few years the focus seem to have shifted towards the more casual, amusement park oriented, tourist instead of the true aviation enthusiasts. The Aviodrome web site used to host a forum where the enthusiasts could exchange information, but this forum had been shut down and replaced by Facebook, Hyves and Twitter accounts.

    Of course the present financial crisis makes things rather difficult for the Aviodrome. I sincerely hope that they will succeed in reviving their business and that we will have the opportunity to enjoy many more of the activities that were organized by the Aviodrome in the not too distant past, like the celebration of 70 years of the DC-3 / Dakota and 75 years Melbourne race.

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/Mil_Vliegspek_002.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_142.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_203.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/MelbourneRace_224.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/Aviodrome2006_209.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/Aviodrome2006_221.jpg

    in reply to: Color correction #444827
    Jur
    Participant

    A skylight filter just warms up the picture a tiny little bit. It can be used in digital, but the same effect can just as easy be accomplished in post processing. In digital photography a skylight filter as a precaution to UV induced unsharpness is also useless, because the sensor is not sensible to UV light anyway. The drawback of any filter is that it introduces two additional planes through which the light has to pass, with increased risks to diminished contrast and sharpness and flare. My advice, if there’s nothing to filter don’t use one.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 377 total)