Thanks GS, actually I was assuming that the Norseman is being restored to fly, but this is possibly not correct?
The original intention was to make the Norseman flyable again. I have no idea whether or not this is still feasible, but looking at the quality of the restoration it doesn’t seem impossible.
Norseman looks lovely!:)
Is the Tracker a potential flyer or a museum exhibit?
The Grumman S-2F Tracker is far from a potential flyer, as she has been outside for more than 40 years. Initially she was outside the original Aviodome Museum at Schiphol Airport, until the museum moved to Lelystad Airport and became the Aviodrome.
Schiphol about 1975
Lelystad 2009
There is another former Royal Netherlands Navy Tracker in the Aviodrome museum, which is in a much better shape. The livery is a bit odd, as she has been a training exhibit in a technical school for several years.:o

The word “aerodrome” is still heavily used in official aviation documents, laws and regulations, like those of the UK CAA and especially ICAO!
Examples of definitions used in ICAO and related documents:
– aerodrome
– aerodrome control service
– aerodrome control tower
– aerodrome traffic
– aerodrome traffic zone
– aerodrome controller
The word “airport” is used sometimes to make a distinction between smaller “aerodromes” and larger ones which are mainly used for commercial transport.
😀 Wonderful stuff,that Norseman looks a real character,just needs to be dirty so it looks like it’s been somewhere a bit naughty and has a story to tell.
This is how she was found in France; dirty enough? 🙂

Another view of the Cosford Varsity (2008)

A few more Vikings: Rotterdam Airport 1965


And a more recent (2010) picture of the Varsity at the IWM at Duxford

A few pics from my archives
Autair Viking G-AGRW at Schiphol Airport 1966


Varsity T.1 at Biggin Hill September 1970




You may get reasonable results with a bridge camera (mini DSLR), but you’ll very soon want something “better”; better and faster AF tracking, better viewfinder, faster frames/sec, interchangeable and faster lenses, etc., etc.
If you are likely to take aviation photography seriously eventually, my advice would be to steer clear of those “mini DSLR’s” and opt straight for a proper DSLR.
Beautiful pics! Nice to see DH.104 G-ALFT, which reminds me of her sistership G-ALFU, which is now dangling from the ceiling in Duxford. When I was at the College of Air Traffic Control (for my Approach Radar Training) in Hurn in 1970, I had several hours flying in the righthand seat of this aircraft. Ah, great memories…..:)
For what it’s worth:
According to Nikon, Scan 4.03 is compatible with Windows Vista and could also be working with Windows 7 in 32-bit mode.
Jur, was that shot JPEG or RAW? If it was RAW have you applied any noise reduction?
I always shoot RAW and process in Nikon Capture NX2. For this shot no noise reduction was applied. Neither for this shot at ISO 2000.

The TS requested advice for a camera with a “full size sensor and a modestly wide angle lens”. In my opinion a “full size sensor” is one of 36x24mm. The sensors of bridge camera’s (usually 1/25″ CCD’s = 5.75×4.31mm) don’t even come close to this and they cannot be compared.
The cheapest way (although not “cheap”) into a DSLR with a genuine full size sensor seems to be a secondhand Nikon D700. This could be complemented with a modestly priced Nikkor AFD 35mm/2.0 lens.
Example is a picture made with a D700 and Nikkor AFS 28-70/2.8 at 38mm and ISO 640; handheld /125sec at f/5.6

100% crop
This one is of September 1st, 2010.

This is how she looked on August 28th 2010. A remarkable progress since then!

Very nice pictures Brian! That watchtower building is a beautiful addition. On my last visit to Hendon in November 2009, I was rather disappointed by the lighting inside the museum halls. Most of all I disliked the multi-coloured lighting in the BoB hall. I much preferred the “normal” lighting of the BoB hall during my first visit in the mid seventies.