dark light

Jur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chipmunks #1310238
    Jur
    Participant

    A few pics of G-BBMX (WP924 / 17).

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/OpendagEelde2006-05-13_0091.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/OpendagEelde2006-05-13_0108.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/OpendagEelde2006-05-13_0181.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/OpendagEelde2006-05-13_0183.jpg

    in reply to: F-84s in NATO service #1323962
    Jur
    Participant

    I have a rather complete list somewhere of all the F-84F’s in Royal Netherlands Airforce service. What information do you need, other than registration- and serial numbers?

    I just found a link (in Dutch) with the history of all RNAF F-84F’s http://home.casema.nl/kw.jonker/Typen/R/Republic%20F84F.htm#Registraties

    Hopefully most entries are self-explanatory. verongelukt means “crashed”; IRAN=”Inspect and Repair as Necessary”; LETS=”Luchtmacht Electronische en Technische School”

    in reply to: FOR SALE – Mil 12 helicopter – Maybe? #1326297
    Jur
    Participant

    As an air traffic controller at Schiphol Airport Amsterdam, I handled the second prototype of the Mi-12 (CCCP-21142) in May 1971 on arrival for a fuelstop on its way to Le Bourget. It was a truely awesome sight!

    It had also made a fuelstop at Groningen Airport Eelde that day; see this link http://www.crosswinds.net/~wolbrink for a picture and select Eelde 1970-1975 photo history.

    in reply to: Dutch Spitfire landing mishap #1267235
    Jur
    Participant

    This is what she looked like a week before the mishap.

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_309.jpg

    in reply to: Sigma 70-200 F2.8 V Nikkor 80-400 VR #452675
    Jur
    Participant

    Greater the fps the greater the probability in getting the exact frame you want and in many cases: a frame thats better than you expected. That is why they make cameras with 10fps and thats is why D3 is huffing and puffing about 9fps (even though its 9fps JPEG in DX (not FX) mode)

    Incorrect! In FX mode the D3 delivers up to 9fps, in DX mode up to 11fps.
    Apart from that, with good timing and experience 3fps can deliver great results. Way in the past I’ve even managed to get good results without any kind of motordrive. My present camera’s can deliver up to 8fps, but I hardly ever need anything faster than about 3.5fps.

    And yes, Nikon allows the 70-200 with TC to work with both AFS and VR!

    in reply to: Sigma 70-200 F2.8 V Nikkor 80-400 VR #452792
    Jur
    Participant

    Gary,

    I don’t own any of these two lenses, but this is what I think:

    – When only some sections of an aircraft are slightly out of focus and other sections aren’t, it has nothing to do with movement blur (but probably because of not using an aperture small enough for the required depth of field and improper focusing technique). VR would not help in this respect.

    – The Nikkor 80-400VR has no AF-S and is therefore rather slow in focussing, which could be a problem with moving aircraft. Otherwise this lens is reported to be very good optically.

    – The Sigma 70-200HSM has received very good reviews and optically seems to be almost as good as the Nikkor AF-S 2.8/70-200VR. However it lacks VR.

    – I’m very happy using the Nikkor 70-200VR on moving aircraft, with or without the TC14EII converter, which transforms this lens into a 100-280.

    – For longer reach I use the AF-S Nikkor 4/300, with or without the TC14EII; excellent sharpness and faster focussing than the 80-400VR.

    I hope this helps making up your mind.

    in reply to: Flying DC6 #1276427
    Jur
    Participant

    Julian Firth, captain of G-APSA, mailed me that they will be in Lelystad (NL) again on Friday 14th September and from there on to the Hamburg Airshow.

    See this list of participants http://www.aviation-community.de/index.php/airport-days-hamburg/erwartete-flugzeuge/

    in reply to: Flying DC6 #1276473
    Jur
    Participant

    Another few shots of G-APSA in 1953 KLM livery

    Just another few shots of this gorgeous looking bird…….

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_064_web.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_282web.jpg

    in reply to: Aerodrome models #1278963
    Jur
    Participant

    Thought this might interest a few forumites. It’s a scale model (1:300) of RAF Pocklington circa 1942-45. Built by a guy called Bernard Ross, assisted by Graham Puckering, they brought it to Breighton at the weekend and set it out in one of the hangars. Fascinating to look at, I gather its a work in progress which they hope to add lights to in due course. How wide spread is this hobby I wonder, and do other examples exist…?

    Simply beautiful! It’s only a pity that they put the runway number 07 upside down. It should be readable in the landing direction.

    in reply to: Flying DC6 #1280964
    Jur
    Participant

    This is a FDC which was carried on the original flight in The Christchurch Race (October 1953) on board of KLM DC-6 PH-TGA “DR. IR. M.H. Damme”).

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/ChristchurchRace.jpg

    in reply to: Flying DC6 #1280979
    Jur
    Participant

    The KLM livery is applied to G-APSA for this movie http://www.idtv.nl/film/development/brideflight.html

    A few pictures I took at Lelystad Aerodrome on September 1st:

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_065.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_068.jpg

    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb167/Jur_photo/GiantsFlyin_2007-09-01_213.jpg

    in reply to: Old Pics for Digital ? #453727
    Jur
    Participant

    For pictures you need a flatbed scanner. Better results can usually be obtained if you still have the negatives or transparancies available, which should be scanned with a filmscanner. Some of the newer flatbed scanners do also offer the option to scan negatives and transparancies.

    in reply to: Help please #453909
    Jur
    Participant

    It all depends on the lighting conditions and the ISO setting. In the old film days (even without a lightmeter) the “sunny f16 rule” was a very convenient means to estimate the correct exposure.

    This is how it works:
    1. set the shutterspeed closest to 1/ISO; e.g. ISO 400 set shutterspped to 1/500
    2. in bright sun (no clouds) with deep shadows set aperture at f16
    3. sunny conditions with some clouds set aperture at f11
    4. cloudy with faint shadows set aperture at f8

    Of course any variation of the same exposure value can be set; e.g. 1/500 at f8 can be replaced by 1/250 at f11, 1/1000 at f5.6, 1/125 at f16, etc.

    Based on the above, 1/400 at f13 could have been right for sunny conditions with a few clouds when the ISO had been set at 400. With lower ISO values the pictures would have been underexposed.

    Hope this helps to evaluate the problem.

    in reply to: Temporary inability to change aperture #454437
    Jur
    Participant

    PS apropos of flat batteries – i just used to work to the rule that i use 125 @ f8 if you can see any sort of shadow, 125 @ f2.8 if you cant see any sort of shadows and 250 @ f11 if you need sunglasses 🙂 . It may be old school , but it generally works (100 asa)

    This is called the “sunny f16 rule”:
    1. set the shutterspeed closest to 1/ISO (e.g. ISO 100: 1/125, ISO 400: 1/500)
    2. aperture: bright sun f16, sunny with clouds f11, some shadows f8

    in reply to: Nikon D200 hints and tips #454591
    Jur
    Participant

    I have one little query, is it beneficial to shoot in RAW?, My D70s was useless on Jpeg and the only way to get quality shots with it was to shoot in RAW 100% of the time, on first impressions the D200 in Jpeg mode is awesome and not that much different from the RAW shots.

    John,

    I’m glad to have been of help to you.
    I always shoot RAW as this gives me the widest range in postprocessing capabilities, especially white balance, exposure correction and colour modes.

    For RAW (NEF) development I prefer to use Nikon Capture NX, which provides me with the best picture quality possible. Another advantage of NX is that it makes full use of your in-camera settings. Programs like Rawshooter, Adobe Lightroom and ACR only read the white balance settings but disregard all other in-camera settings. Also the incorporated U-point technology is a real benefit, which saves me from applying the much more complex layers options in Photoshop.

    The only disadvantage of NX is that it is rather slow compared to the others and you really need to have a minimum of 2gb memory installed in your PC. When I’m in a hurry with a large batch of pictures, I sometimes use Adobe Lightroom.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 377 total)