You may find this link as useful as I did.
Where are the days when you can leave all the developing decision to your trusty photo finisher?
Shooting RAW has almost nothing to do with colour burn out and once the colour is already burnt out there is nothing you can do to bring them back.
Honestly I’ve never been impressed by the quality of work from the “trusty photo finisher”. Scratches on negatives, bad colour correction, etc. In addition to that, especially ground-to-air photography, often requires some final cropping to make a pleasant composition. Therefore some 40 years ago I made the decision to do all darkroomwork myself (B&W and colour negative). Compared to learning how to use programs like photoshop, learning how to frame, expose, colour correct and develop films and prints requires quite a bit more of effort and cost.
Colour burnt out has indeed to do with the initial (over)exposure, but this is very much the same with using colour positive film. Burnt out parts can never be regained. However, when using RAW digital and provided that you watch out for overexposure by checking the histograms regularly, many corrections in exposure, colour and contrast can be made in postprocessing which would not be possible with film in the same quality.
Having said that, I will continue to use both digital and film (especially for B&W).
I know that the dynamic range of digital is somewhat limited compared with film. With the better digital camera’s this can be overcome by shooting RAW, selecting low in-camera contrast and careful exposure (watch the histograms). In post processing the contrast can be brought at the desired level.
Film has of course its merits too and I will certainly continue to use my trusted Nikon F100, F4s and FM2n camera’s. However for photographing aircraft, especially ground to air shots, I’ve found that digital gives much cleaner skies, better colour and better sharpness.
Purple fringing, or chromatic aberation (CA), is not a problem which is exclusive to digital. It is usually limited to the extreme corners in wideangle lenses. However in digital it can easily be corrected by using programs like Photoshop or Nikon Capture in post processing. With film CA is almost impossible to correct.
Since a few months I’ve turned digital with a Nikon D2X. The resolution, sharpness and colour fidelity of this camera surpasses anything I’ve used in film camera’s, including medium format. Not to mention its speed ……………
Jur,
Thanks for sharing those with us!
Richard.
Richard,
You’re welcome, but thank you very much for that beautiful presentation of your visit to Monino.
Mil Helicopters
A few old photo’s, which I took of Mil helicopters in 1966 at Schiphol and 1967 at the Paris Show. They include the MI-10 and MI-6 at Schiphol and the Mil-10K and Mil-6 together at the Paris Airshow.
You may have noticed that the MI-6 Hook at Schiphol Airport is the same one as the MI-6 at the Paris 1967 photo. This aircraft, reg. CCCP-06174, was demonstrated in Paris in a fire fighting role. Later that year CCCP-06174 crashed in the south of France while on a fire fighting mission.
Mil MI-12
At the top of the list of things I wanted to see was this Mil Mi-12 helicopter, which has the NATO code name “Homer”. The Mi-12 is the largest helicopter which has ever flown. Two or three prototypes were built, it never went into production but it did quite a bit of flying, including a trip across Europe to the Paris Air Show. Depending on which source you believe, this was either in 1965, 1971, 1981 or 1985; as far as I can tell 1971 is the correct date.
It was indeed in 1971 that the Mil MI-12 visited the Paris Airshow. As an air traffic controller at Schiphol Airport Amsterdam, I handled this aircraft myself on a stop to Paris. Seeing this giant fly was quite a sight.
And another bunch…….
A few more pictures from Eelde, including a Yak-52.
G-HUNT
Here’s one taken at Soesterberg Airbase (NL) in 1981 (if my memory is correct). It’s not a very good one I’m afraid. Taken in very bad weather conditions.
Thank you all for your kind responses. It’s very nice to discover that many on the Flypast Forum still enjoy seeing pictures from that era in aviation, especially since they were taken with relatively modest equipment. I started my training to become an air traffic controller in 1965, so I have very fond memories of that period.
And some more………. 🙂
And a few more from those glorious days.
I think the Hunter is a Navy FRADTU (Fleet Requirements and Drogue Towing Unit) aeroplane which in the early 1970s was based at Bournemouth Hurn. I suspect they operated some Sea Vixens too.
In 1970 I followed an approach radar course at the College of Air Traffic Control at Hurn. Whe also did practice surveillance radar approaches with aircraft returning from drogue towing missions. Those were mainly Meteor’s and Scimitar’s.
Great shots Ronnie!! As this is a photography forum: what lens and shutterspeeds did you use for the in-flight shots. Seems slower than 1/250 sec (moving props). Did you use any kind of support (monopod, tripod, etc.). I know how difficult it is to handle long lenses with slowish shutterspeeds. Fantastic!